ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/aec/30296919
October 05, 2016 11:17
Yangon – Myanmar has abolished one of themost authoritarian laws used by previous military regimes tosilence political opponents, a lawmaker said on Tuesday.
The Emergency Provisions Act gave authorities broad powersto hold people without charge and allowed courts to convict onscanty evidence.
Military members of parliament, who fill 25 percent of seatsunder Myanmar’s military-drafted constitution, had opposedrepealing it on the grounds it was vital to national security.
Military members of parliament, who fill 25 percent of seatsunder Myanmar’s military-drafted constitution, had opposedrepealing it on the grounds it was vital to national security.
The law was introduced in 1950 as newly independent Myanmarstruggled with nascent ethnic insurgencies but was thenfrequently used against activists after the military seizedpower in a 1962 coup.
Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy, which assumed power this year after a landslide election, has releasedpolitical prisoners and prioritised doing away with oppressivelegislation left over from decades of authoritarian rule.
The majority party’s lawmakers, among them many veteranactivists who served time in prison, have already pushed throughthe repeal of a 1975 law on “subversive elements”.
Tun Tun Hein, chairman of the parliament’s bill committee,told Reuters the approval of the union parliament – members ofboth houses sitting together – meant the repeal will become lawwithin two weeks.
“This law was used by the socialist dictatorship to arrestanyone who went against them,” he said.
“Now we have abolished it because we have a people’sgovernment,” he said.
One of the more notorious parts of the law set out sentencesof up to seven years jail for “disrupt(ing) the morality or thebehaviour of a group of people or the general public”.
Thein Than Oo, a lawyer and former political prisoner, saidhe had been imprisoned twice under the “harsh and unjust” law.
“In fact, this kind of law shouldn’t exist in a civilizedsociety anywhere,” he said.
-Reuters
Share this:
- Share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest