There is only one reported case so far, in American journalist Hoda Kotb, but the prevalence of selfies would suggest that there are many more undiagnosed cases in our midst.

Kotb, a popular TV anchor known for her love of selfies, has recently complained of an achy elbow.

When the 51-year-old consulted her orthopaedist, he asked if she was playing tennis or table tennis. It turned out that the pain was due to her constant selfie taking, Elle.com said.

“When you take the picture, your arm is up, bent in a weird way and you just click, click, click-think about how many you take: 20, 30, or 40. Selfie elbow, everyone has it!” she told the fashion magazine.

Tendonitis occurs when the tendon becomes inflamed, while carpal tunnel is caused by the compression of the median nerve in the wrist, usually due to overuse of the hand.

Doctors told the magazine that more patients have come to them for tech-related injuries.

Earlier, doctors saw cases of ’Blackberry thumb’, from overuse of the smart phone. The ’iPad hand’ is another manifestation of such overuse. Gaming for long hours have also caused tendonitis.

“You get tennis elbow from playing too much tennis-or having poor form-and you get selfie elbow from taking too many selfies,” said Dr Jordan Metzl, a sports medicine physician at New York’s Hospital for Special Surgery. “You put too much stress on the muscle and it irritates the area where the muscle comes off the bone.”

Selfie lovers can avoid such a predicament by switching the arms they use to snap their photos, he advised.

They can also use a selfie stick, or take photos the old-fashioned way – asking someone else to take the shot.

But if you do get ’selfie elbow’, some painkillers, ice and some stretching should help alleviate the condition. Of course the cure would be to stop taking so many selfies.

Elsewhere in the region, manufacturing experienced a small lift in some economies but analysts say the uptick will be short-lived and that long-term prospects remain anaemic.

Singapore’s Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) – an early indicator of manufacturing activity – came in at 49.6 last month, down slightly from the 49.8 reading in May. A reading below 50 indicates contraction.

The fall came as domestic and export orders shrank alongside declines in employment and production. The data is compiled by the Singapore Institute of Purchasing and Materials Management, from a monthly poll of purchasing executives at about 150 industrial companies.

Manufacturing, which makes up a fifth of the economy, has been hit hard by tepid global growth and ongoing restructuring. The industry has been in recession for over a year, according to some economists.

There will be “no light at the end of the Singapore manufacturing tunnel” in this half of the year, said OCBC economist Selena Ling.

“Domestic business confidence is likely to remain subdued in the near term, especially in the wake of the Brexit-induced uncertainties,” she added.

DBS economist Irvin Seah said PMI readings are expected to “inch gingerly higher in the coming months” due to seasonal effects, as manufacturers ramp up production to meet orders for the year-end festive season.

However, there could be fewer orders this year than last year.

“Without a sustained improvement in global demand, it is still a bleak outlook for the manufacturing sector after all,” added Mr Seah.

Manufacturing showed tentative signs of life elsewhere in the world. Key data in the United States showed positive signs, while South Korea and Taiwan – Asia’s industrial bellwethers – logged expansionary PMI readings for June.

“Look closely, however, and it’s doubtful there’ll be much follow- through,” said Mr Frederic Neumann, co-head of Asian economics research at HSBC, in a research note. “China is softening again, global new export orders continue to contract, and new orders in Asia aren’t improving. It all feels wobbly. And Brexit isn’t helping.”

China’s official manufacturing PMI edged down in June to reach 50, from the 50.1 logged in May and April.

A separate private survey of China’s manufacturing activity – the Caixin Manufacturing PMI – fell to 48.6 last month, from the 49.2 reading in May.

According to Euromonitor, a foreign research firm, Vietnam’s instant noodle market had a value at VND24.3 trillion in 2015, 10 per cent higher than 2014.

The value was expected to grow to VND25.7 trillion in 2016 and VND26.6 trillion in 2017.

There are 50 enterprises engaged in producing instant noodles in Vietnam. Seventy per cent of the revenue has come from Acecook, Masan Consumer and Asia Foods, the three largest instant noodles producers.

Acecook Vietnam is the largest domestic producer of instant noodles, accounting for 40 per cent of the market. The company registered a revenue of VND9 trillion in 2014 and VND9.3 trillion in sales in 2015.

The second largest enterprise, Masan Consumer, held 25 per cent of the local market share in 2015. It gained VND5 trillion from packed instant noodle sales.

Meanwhile, the World International Noodle Association (WINA) has reported that consumption of instant noodles in Vietnam reduced over the past two years following a downtrend on the world market. Consumption dropped from 5.2 billion packets in 2013, to 5 billion in 2014, and 4.8 billion in 2015.

Inaccurate information about the product has made customers wary and resulted in reduced sales, the association reported.

However, Kajiwara Junichi, general director of Acecook Vietnam, said consumption of instant noodles had recovered in the first half of this year.

In the first six months of this year, Acecook Vietnam sold 1.3 billion packets and exported 100 million packets, 9 per cent higher than the same period last year, he said. The company expected sales of 2.9 billion packets this year.

Vietnam has the best production costs so the company produces its instant noodles here and exports it to 46 countries and territories, he said. In the future, the company would promote cup noodles due to its high demand.

Vietnam is the fourth largest consumer of instant noodles in the world, after China, Indonesia and Japan, according to the association.

The OBG said in its latest report the transport industry is expected to help Brunei diversify its economy.

While the single market and production base envisioned by the AEC has not been fully realised, physical infrastructure and its integrity within each individual country were vital in doing so.

“Developments to cross-border roads, power lines, railway and maritime transport will all be crucial in turning the aspiration into a reality and improvements in these areas will boost new and existing value chains and production networks”, OBG said.

OBG highlighted recent progress in aspects of the country’s transport sector, noting areas such as the road network, strategic waterways, air freight and ports as well as the Temburong Bridge megaproject will be important economic contributors in the upcoming future.

“The extent to which the various transport and logistics related initiatives being pursued by the private sector, the government and Asean as a whole will be a boon to the economy remains to be seen,” OBG said. “However, the government appears to be taking the challenge of transforming the sector into a regional powerhouse seriously, as evidenced by the potential drivers for growth it has created in the last few years.”

OBG said foreign investors and the private sector are also beginning to recognise that the transport and logistics sectors are now ripe for investment.

OBG said the coastal highway backbone that runs eastwards from Kuala Belait in the northwest to Muara Port in the northeast is part of the pan-Borneo transport network connecting Brunei to Malaysia and Indonesia.

OBG said Brunei’s position adjacent to the sea lanes of the South China Sea made 209km of its waterways and 161km of its coastline logistically important.

“Under the Kuala Lumpur Transport Strategic Plan 2016-25, Brunei has agreed to contribute to the establishment of an Asean Single Shipping Market and to promote maritime safety, security and strategic economic corridors within Asean,” OBG said. It also noted that under that strategic plan, Brunei will engage in regional maritime transport cooperation to develop strategic maritime logistics corridors within ASEAN.

OBG said Brunei’s recent efforts for airport modernisation, noting that the move to transform the terminal into a passenger and cargo gateway should be an asset with the roll-out of the Asean Open Skies policy and competition between the region airlines increases.

The open skies policy which came into effect in January 2015 has been ratified by Brunei despite concerns of increased competition to the national carrier Royal Brunei, said the report and will see all airline companies from the 10 member-states of Asean to be able to fly freely from their home country to any city within the bloc.

The group believes the transaction and alliance with DHG, as the leading drug maker in Vietnam, will enable it to share knowledge, technology and experience in the pharmaceutical business with DHG, resulting in an increase in sales and further growth for both company’s businesses in Asia.

In addition, synergy is expected between DHG, with its strong presence in Vietnam, and Taisho Group. The group is committed to enhancing its pharmaceutical business in Asia and is striving to grow various business segments in the continuously expanding Asian market.

According to data from the Vietnam Securities Depository, the Japanese drug maker bought the shares from 34 foreign shareholders, including Dragon Capital, VinaCapital and other stakeholders such as Fullerton, Nikko New Age Asia Equity, KITMC, Mekong Portfolio Investments Limited and Vietnam Holding. The foreign ownership percentage in DHG has almost reached its maximum level, with only 0.01 per cent remaining.

The value of the deal was not disclosed, but based on June 30 data, with each DHG share ending at 103,000 dong, the deal should be worth nearly 2.2 trillion dong (US$98 million).

Based in Can Tho province since 1974, DHG Pharmaceutical Joint Stock Company is one of the leading drug makers in Vietnam. As of March 2016, State Capital Investment Corporation, with 43.31 per cent of the stake, was DHG’s largest shareholder, followed by Franklin Templeton Investment funds – Templeton Frontier Markets Fund, with 9.44 per cent, and Portal Global Limited Holding, with 7.7 per cent. When Portal Global Limited announced the sale of DHG shares to Taisho, the other two shareholders announced no change to their own stake.

DHG reported marked net revenue of 3.6 trillion dong in the fiscal year that ended on Dec 31, 2015, posting a year-on-year decrease of 8 per cent. Of this amount, the company’s net revenue in Q4 of 2015 reached 1.149 trillion dong. After Q1 this year, DHG rose 22 per cent in sales, reaching 815 billion dong. Its net profit also soared 26.3 per cent, reaching 368 billion dong. For the entire year in 2016, the company aims to earn 3.7 trillion dong in revenue and 750 billion dong in pre-tax profit.

After the announcement of the 35 per cent dividend for 2015 in May, DHG shares surged by more than 23 per cent from a value of 82,000 dong to some 100,000 dong each on the HCM City Stock Exchange.

Taisho Pharmaceuticals, headquartered in Tokyo, is a leading Japanese pharmaceutical company specialising in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products and non-prescription dietary supplements under well-known brands. In Southeast Asia, Lipovitan-D (energy drink with vitamins) is the company’s most famous brand. In 2015, the parent company recorded revenue of $2.7 billion and profit after tax of $210 million. In the local market, Taisho founded an $11.8 million investment company that manufactures and distributes Lipovitan drinks.

(US$1 = 22,605 dong as of 7/6/2016 via oanda.com)

A report by Japanese investment consulting firm Seiko Ideas Corp. said Japan would have to allow imports of even the most sensitive items from all TPP members.

This would put Japan in a disadvantageous situation since its agricultural production is small and expensive, it said.

Japanese firms therefore decided to step up investment in the Vietnamese agriculture sector since the latter is also a TPP member.

They could then export products from Vietnam to their country paying zero tax. The TPP stipulates that to enjoy the zero tariff, a product must have 70 per cent content from member countries.

Seeing the writing on the wall, Kato Group began to collaborate with Binh Dinh province last year to invest US$771,000 in tuna fishing through 2020.

It has helped the central province master the technologies used in sea tuna fishing and on-board storage so that the products meet quality requirements when exported to Japan.

The province has bought five sets of Japanese tuna fishing equipment at a cost of 1.5 billion dong (US$66,355) for training its fishermen.

Shudensha Company has been implementing an $820,000 project to improve water quality at aquaculture farms.

OTA Kaki Company is collaborating with the central highlands province of Lam Dong to develop a flower market with an effective distribution system.

Also in Lam Dong, Nikko Foods Company is working on a $820,000 high-quality tomato farming project.

The Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) said it would step up support to the Vietnamese agricultural sector through various projects in which Japanese firms would invest.

Mori Mutsuya, former head of JICA Vietnam, said that Vietnam’s agriculture sector had massive potential.

“For instance, our survey in Lam Dong found that if farmers replace coffee trees with flowers, their income will rise nine fold.”

Scouring the country

Nguyen Do Anh Tuan, head of the Institute for Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development, told Vietnam News Agency that Japanese investors had already started going around the country looking for opportunities to invest in hi-tech farming.

Some had already begun production, including of vegetables in the central highlands province of Lam Dong and mangoes in the Mekong Delta province of Dong Thap and through a hi-tech project in the northern province of Vinh Phuc.

He underscored that Vietnam and Japan saw great opportunities for agricultural co-operation, especially after signing a number of bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements, including the TPP, which has comprehensive commitments.

Once it takes effect in 2018 the TPP is expected to give a push to Vietnam-Japan agricultural investment and trade by opening the market for 38.4 per cent of their agricultural products, 64.8 per cent of aquatic products and 17.2 per cent of wooden products, according to Tuan.

Japan will immediately remove tariffs on 78 per cent of Vietnamese agricultural exports and the figure will rise to 88.5 per cent in the next five or six years.

This is a good opportunity for Vietnam to expand its exports, increase its access to major markets around the world and join global supply chains.

Japanese firms can invest in Vietnam’s agricultural sector to take advantage of tariff incentives, abundant natural resources and cheap labour.

With their advantages in technology and market access in Vietnam, Japanese businesses can invest in making agricultural machinery, fertilisers and pesticides.

They can also look at support industries like packaging, preservation equipment, glass and net houses, and processing.

Tuan said Japanese companies should join hands with their local counterparts to develop large-scale fields and complete value chains and brands for the domestic and international markets.

But to boost such investment flows, Vietnam should provide policy support for investors to resolve difficulties, develop land funds and build infrastructure, he said, adding that local governments should be more proactive in supporting businesses.

The country should focus on fostering small and medium-sized enterprises which can co-operate with Japanese companies in production, processing and distribution, he said.

Figures from the Foreign Investment Agency show that last year Japan was the third largest investor in Vietnam with $1.84 billion, accounting for 8.1 per cent of the total.

Agriculture was among the sectors to attract the largest amounts of investment.

In the central highlands province of Lam Dong, 10 Japanese companies have invested in agriculture, primarily growing clean vegetables.

Others such as Yanmar, Maruyama MFG, Marumasu Kikai, and Nankai Kinzoku are interested in not just investment in high-tech agricultural projects but also want to import farm machinery.