Macy’s cuts 3,900 corporate jobs as layoffs hit headquarters #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Macy’s cuts 3,900 corporate jobs as layoffs hit headquarters

Corporate

Jun 26. 2020Shoppers wait outside the Macy's flagship store in New York on Nov. 28, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Jeenah Moon.Shoppers wait outside the Macy’s flagship store in New York on Nov. 28, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Jeenah Moon.

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Anne Riley Moffat, Jordyn Holman · BUSINESS, RETAIL 

Macy’s Inc. announced plans to slash thousands of back-office jobs in a striking admission that the reeling retail sector won’t be returning to the good old days anytime soon.

The restructuring, including the elimination of about 3,900 corporate and management jobs, is expected to save the company $365 million this fiscal year, then about $630 million a year going forward, it said in a statement.

“We know that we will be a smaller company for the foreseeable future, and our cost base will continue to reflect that moving forward,” Chief Executive Officer Jeff Gennette said.

Shares fell as much as 4.2% in New York. The stock was already down 60% this year, compared with a 5.6% decline in the S&P 500 Index.

The job cuts are in addition to the staff reductions taking place inside stores, along the Macy’s supply chain and in customer support roles. The new round of corporate layoffs adds to fears that many of the measures taken to temporarily furlough employees in the early stages of the pandemic are becoming permanent.

In the wider retail sector, the vast majority of layoffs and furloughs have been at the store level as physical locations remained closed for weeks or months at the onset of the pandemic. But those job cuts have started to trickle up to companies’ headquarters and corporate outposts as well. Gap Inc. laid off at least 10% of its corporate employees, according to Business of Fashion, while Dow Jones reported this week a culling at Barnes & Noble Inc.’s New York head office.

“The reality is that everything is changing, everything is evolving and figuring out how to adapt, how to operate on a smaller base means figuring out how to operate more efficiently at the top,” said Simeon Siegel, retail analyst at BMO Capital Markets. “If a business expects to shrink, it needs to address its corporate makeup as well.”

Even before the pandemic took off in the U.S., Macy’s had taken steps to slim down. The chain in February as part of its turnaround Polaris strategy said it was cutting about 9% of its workforce, or 2,000 jobs.

“Earlier in the year, we announced our Polaris strategy which included major structural changes across the organization. At the time, I was confident that these changes positioned our business for success. Then, a month later, the Covid-19 pandemic hit,” Gennette wrote in an email to staff, obtained by Bloomberg News. “And with that, everything changed.”

The fresh layoff news comes just two weeks after the department-store chain heartened investors by announcing it had reopened 450 stores in some capacity and expected to exit the second quarter with a “clean inventory position.” Gennette said at the time reopened stores are performing better than anticipated, initially sending shares soaring.

But share prices have sunk since then, as customers in some markets continue to avoid large indoor retail spaces in favor of online ordering, local businesses or — to the fear of many retailers — not spending money on non-essentials at all. The U.S. savings rate hit an all-time high of 33% in April thanks mostly to Covid-19-induced business closures, and some of that frugality seems to be persisting.

“Macy’s has done corporate restructuring in the past and having sales essentially decimated from the pandemic may have forced them to look closer at their cost structure, removing excess costs,” said Poonam Goyal, retail analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “Even though stores are reopening, sales aren’t where they used to be. They have to find ways to reduce costs because that’s the one thing that they can control.”

“We do expect other companies to look at their cost structure more closely during the pandemic,” she added.

Macy’s had already been taking steps to shore up access to capital, including leveraging up on new debt. Earlier this month, the company announced a credit line of $3.15 billion backed by its inventories. Including an earlier bond sale, the department-store operator said it had secured $4.5 billion of total new financing.

The company will take a pre-tax cash charge of about $180 million related to the restructuring, mostly in the second quarter. Macy’s also said those workers coming back from furlough will begin to return starting the week of July 5. The company had 123,000 workers at the end of last year, according to a filing.

Lufthansa’s $6.7 billion German recapitalization gets EU nod #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Lufthansa’s $6.7 billion German recapitalization gets EU nod

Corporate

Jun 25. 2020The Lufthansa logo appears on a screen in the airline's empty baggage drop hall at Frankfurt Airport in Germany, on June 24, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Alex Kraus.The Lufthansa logo appears on a screen in the airline’s empty baggage drop hall at Frankfurt Airport in Germany, on June 24, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Alex Kraus.

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Aoife White · BUSINESS, WORLD, US-GLOBAL-MARKETS, EUROPE 

Deutsche Lufthansa won European Union approval for Germany’s 6 billion-euro ($6.7 billion) recapitalization that Irish rival Ryanair Holdings says it will sue to overturn.

The European Commission said in a statement on Thursday that Germany’s plan to take a 20% stake in Europe’s largest airline is in line with state-aid rules and would prevent the carrier’s collapse.

The EU approval covers the German government’s plan to pay 300 million euros for a 20% stake and make two so-called silent participations of 4.7 billion euros and 1 billion euros in the company’s capital.

The decision “comes with strings attached, including to ensure the state is sufficiently remunerated,” EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in an emailed statement. “Lufthansa has committed to make available slots and additional assets at its Frankfurt and Munich hub airports, where Lufthansa has significant market power. This gives competing carriers the chance to enter those markets.”

Germany’s bailout for Lufthansa has already faced resistance from the airline’s supervisory board, which complained about the EU’s demand for it to yield 24 slots a day at Frankfurt and Munich airports once air traffic demand returns. The EU sought the cutbacks to compensate for the massive advantage the state subsidy will give Lufthansa over rivals. Handing over slots should stoke more competition.

Those measures don’t go far enough for Ryanair, which will sue to overturn the EU approval, Chief Legal Officer Juliusz Komorek said. The legal fight adds to several other Ryanair legal challenges to state aid for airlines.

Ryanair is separately seeking an EU cartel probe into alleged discussions between Lufthansa and other airlines to avoid a price war in Italy.

“There is absolutely no reason why Lufthansa, which benefits from the German payroll support system scheme, might on top of this require 9 billion euros,” he told reporters on a video call. “It doesn’t. It needs it as a war chest.”

The German bailout plan overcame a major roadblock when the airline’s biggest investor said he’d vote in favor of the rescue package at a special shareholder meeting later Thursday. He had earlier criticized a steep discount being granted to the German government for the stake, and held the votes to single-handedly stop the share sale.

The EU approval comes with tight conditions to ensure the aid is repaid swiftly and Lufthansa doesn’t use taxpayer funding to expand its business.

Lufthansa will be banned from dividends and share buybacks until the aid is repaid. Managers can’t get bonus payments nor can the company buy more than 10% of rivals until at least 75% of the recapitalization is redeemed. The measures aim to give Lufthansa an incentive to buy back the state stake and silent participations.

The EU’s decision doesn’t cover a 3 billion-euro state loan guarantee that the EU says it will handle separately.

Regulators said the aid “does not exceed the minimum needed to ensure the viability of the airline.” Vestager said last week her officials had quizzed Germany over comments by Lufthansa’s chief executive officer that the aid was more than needed. The EU can’t allow governments to give companies more financial help than they require.

Lufthansa aims to redeem the loan and the recapitalization by 2026, the EU said.

SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son and Alibaba’s Jack Ma part ways #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son and Alibaba’s Jack Ma part ways

Corporate

Jun 25. 2020Masayoshi Son, chairman and chief executive officer of SoftBank Group Corp. (left) and Jack Ma, former chairman of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., shake hands at Tokyo Forum 2019 in Tokyo on Dec. 6, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Kiyoshi Ota.Masayoshi Son, chairman and chief executive officer of SoftBank Group Corp. (left) and Jack Ma, former chairman of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., shake hands at Tokyo Forum 2019 in Tokyo on Dec. 6, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Kiyoshi Ota.

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Pavel Alpeyev · BUSINESS, WORLD, US-GLOBAL-MARKETS, ASIA-PACIFIC 

SoftBank Group Corp. founder Masayoshi Son ended his company’s annual shareholder meeting with a surprise Thursday by announcing he’s stepping down from the board of Chinese e-commerce titan Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

The billionaire said his departure shouldn’t be interpreted as signifying any disagreements, even though Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma is quitting SoftBank’s board at the same time. Ma and Son have maintained a close friendship since the Japanese entrepreneur was an early investor in Alibaba and helped it along to its current value of roughly $600 billion, calling it the crown jewel of SoftBank’s portfolio.

“It’s not like we had a fight,” Son said during the virtual shareholder meeting. “This was perfectly amicable.”

While the mutual departures are unlikely to have an immediate impact on either company, they mark the end of an era. The two men are among the most successful entrepreneurs of their generation and have been able to rely on each other’s advice for decades. Son was on Alibaba’s board as it went public in 2014 in the largest initial public offering in history. When SoftBank ran into trouble with investment losses this year, Son was able to use his Alibaba stake to raise much-needed capital.

“The joint board membership was a big positive for both companies because it gave them a way to benchmark their respective business models,” said Michiaki Tanaka, a business school professor at Rikkyo University in Tokyo. “Not having that board-level contact is a big loss.”

Alibaba remains Son’s most successful investment by far and SoftBank’s most valuable asset. In early 2000, Son invested $20 million into the then-unknown web portal connecting Chinese manufacturers with overseas buyers, a stake that is now worth more than $150 billion. That spectacular return cemented his reputation as an investor and later helped him raise the $100 billion Vision Fund. Son has previously spoken highly of Ma.

“He had no business plan, zero revenue,” Son said about Ma on The David Rubenstein Show. “But his eyes were very strong. I could tell from the way he talked, he has charisma, he has leadership.”

Son is known for anointing the entrepreneurs he finds particularly promising as “the next Jack Ma,” and Alibaba has long served as the standard against which he has judged SoftBank’s other startup investments. But that’s also made Son vulnerable to charismatic founders like WeWork’s Adam Neumann, whose many governance transgressions led to the office-sharing firm canceling its initial public offering last year. WeWork, once thought to be worth $47 billion, has lost more than 90% of its value.

Son’s recent track record has been spotty. Starting with the WeWork fiasco, he has suffered a string of setbacks at portfolio companies including Wag Labs, Zume Pizza and Brandless Inc. SoftBank lost almost $18 billion writing down the value of its startup companies in the last fiscal year.

Still, Son struck an optimistic note at the shareholder meeting Thursday. He began the presentation to investors in typical fashion, reaffirming his conviction that a global digital transformation and the advent of artificial intelligence — both accelerated during the pandemic — will help his investments in the likes of TikTok-owner ByteDance Ltd. and British chip designer Arm Ltd.

SoftBank is in the process of offloading 4.5 trillion yen (about $42 billion) of assets to bankroll stock buybacks and slash debt to reassure investors. On Thursday, the company announced a third 500-billion-yen buyback, having completed an earlier one this month.

The company this week agreed to sell a stake in T-Mobile US for as much as $20 billion. Together with the $11.5 billion from issuing contracts to sell Alibaba stock and a sale of stock in its domestic telecom unit, Son’s company has now completed 80% of its envisioned asset unwinding, he said.

Son said he was “graduating” from Alibaba’s board. But the two-decade-long relationship produced few cooperative venture of note, even while the two companies were constructing e-commerce empires in their respective markets. In 2010, the two agreed to link their online platforms to allow users of SoftBank’s Yahoo Japan to buy products on Alibaba’s Taobao site, but the project failed to gain momentum. In 2015, Alibaba backed SoftBank’s failed bipedal robotics business.

“Following Jack Ma leaving the SoftBank board, Son stepping down from Alibaba is merely a symbolic end of an era,” said Justin Tang, head of Asian research at United First Partners in Singapore. “It will be business as usual for both companies.”

A shareholder asked at the Thursday meeting how many of the 88 companies SoftBank’s Vision Fund currently has on its books will be the next Alibaba. Son’s answer was that there are one or two “mini-Alibabas.”

WHA confident of 15 per cent growth this year despite Covid-19 crisis #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

WHA confident of 15 per cent growth this year despite Covid-19 crisis

Corporate

Jun 25. 2020

By THE NATION

WHA Corporation, a logistics and industrial facilities provider, is confident of 15 per cent growth in logistics, public utility and digital platforms.

The company expects the industrial estate business to recover in the second half of the year to reach its target of 1,400 rai.

WHA Group chairman and group chief executive Jareeporn Jarukornsakul said that before Covid-19, the company had estimated that 2020 would be its best year yet with more than 20 per cent expansion in overall businesses.

“After the outbreak crisis hit, we reduced our target to 15 per cent on average across four main businesses of the group, namely logistics, industrial estate, public utility and digital platform,” she said.

Jureeporn

Jureeporn

“The outbreak has helped boost the company’s logistics business significantly as can be seen by up to 400 per cent growth in the number of customers who rented our warehouses in the first half of the year.”

Jareeporn added that currently WHA has 2.5 million square metres of warehouse space and is planning to expand to 2.56 million within the end of 2020.

“So far this year we have rented out an additional 30,000sqm of warehouse space to customers and expect that until the year-end there will be more customers who need storage space, especially those from China,” she added.

As for the industrial estate business, the group estimated that the outbreak should have only short-term impact as many foreign customers are still planning to move from China to Thailand to avoid the impact of US-China trade war.

“Their plan was put on hold temporarily due to the outbreak, but we believe that in the second half of 2020 they will start migrating as planned,” added Jareeporn. “Furthermore, we have been contacted by several companies in Hong Kong and Taiwan who are interested in moving to Thailand, especially those in electronic industries.”

“WHA set the target of industrial estate areas sold or rented to customers within 2020 at 1,400 rai, 1,200 of which are in Thailand and 200 of which in Vietnam,” she added.

“Thailand has the advantage of superior infrastructure and support for 5G technology, making it suitable for high-technology, modern automotive and electronic industries, while our industrial estates in Vietnam will focus largely on labour-intensive industry.”

Jareeporn added that the company’s public utility and digital platform businesses both have suffered minor impacts from Covid-19 and should be able to reach the expansion target by the year-end.

“Only the industrial estate business, which is accountable for 20 per cent of the company’s revenue, saw significant impact in the first half of the year and we are positive that the market will improve in the second half when foreign investors are allowed in the country,” she said.

“As for this year’s investment budget, we had previously allocated Bt9 billion and will maintain this target until the year-end, while next year’s budget has been set at Bt10 billion to expand the four business groups with investment in 5G infrastructure and robotics technology for industrial factories,” added Jureeporn.

The Fed is cracking down on big banks to guard against risk posed to the financial system from the coronavirus pandemic #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

The Fed is cracking down on big banks to guard against risk posed to the financial system from the coronavirus pandemic

Econ

Jun 26. 2020

By The Washington Post · Renae Merle, Rachel Siegel · NATIONAL, BUSINESS, HEALTH 

WASHINGTON – For the first time since the aftermath of the global financial crisis, the Federal Reserve is putting new restrictions on how the country’s biggest banks spend capital with an eye toward protecting the financial system from risks to the economy posed by coronavirus pandemic.

The Federal Reserve ordered the country’s 34 biggest banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, to suspend their stock buyback programs and to limit dividend payments to shareholders. The banks must also submit new plans for maintaining enough of the they capital needed to survive a downturn.

Most banks are in good shape now, the Fed’s Vice Chair Randal Quarles said in a statement. “The banking system remains well capitalized under even the harshest of these downside scenarios-which are very harsh indeed,” Quarles said.

However, if there is slower U-shaped recovery or a W-shaped scenario where a brief recovery is followed by a harsh second drop later this year, “several (financial firms) would approach minimum capital levels,” according to a Fed statement. The banks reviewed could incur loan losses of $560 billion to $700 billion under some scenarios, the Fed found.

The hopeful outlook was not shared by all Federal Reserve Board members. Federal Reserve Gov. Lael Brainard wrote a separate statement calling on the Fed to block dividend payouts to shareholders during the third quarter, not just limit them.

“I do not support giving the green light for large banks to deplete capital, which raises the risk they will need to tighten credit or rebuild capital during the recovery. This policy fails to learn a key lesson of the financial crisis, and I cannot support it,” wrote Brainard, who was appointed by President Obama.

The Fed’s decision adds to the already-bleak reality gripping the American economy during the worst recession since the Great Depression.

More than 30 million Americans have claimed unemployment benefits as of last week, and more major companies keep filing for bankruptcy each week. Despite trillions of dollars in government stimulus and unprecedented intervention from the Fed, many say an economic recovery hinges most on more federal assistance and a vaccine or cure to end to the coronavirus pandemic.

This recession marks the first big test of banking industry reforms put in place after the financial crisis. The banking industry has emphasized that it has significantly more capital to weather a downturn and has not stopped lending to corporations or retail investors.

But some regulators have warned that after years of record profits, the banking industry could be hit hard depending on how long this downturn persists.

“If this goes on long enough, it could produce strains in the banking sector. And then the Fed and Congress and Treasury would have to step in to make sure that the banks are sound,” Neel Kashkari, the head of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, said on “Face the Nation” in April. 

The Fed typically conducts a “stress test” to assess whether the largest banks could survive a hypothetical economic crisis without needing a taxpayer bailout or being forced to stop lending. The hypothetical scenario for this year’s traditional stress was published in February, just as the coronavirus pandemic and its economic devastation began to take hold.

The Fed quickly realized that the extreme scenario it had dreamed up paled in comparison to the escalating crisis. The typical test looks at how the banks would perform, for example, if unemployment spiked to 10 percent. Now, the official unemployment rate is 13.3 percent, and the real rate is likely 3 percentage points higher.

The Fed then developed a coronavirus-specific test it used to shape its policy on payouts of shareholder dividends. 

The Fed’s approach has been met with its share of criticism. For example, the traditional test typically include data specific to large banks, with a spotlight on specific banks that need work. But this new test aggregated data comparing how the banking system would fare as a whole.

Three Democratic senators said it was “highly disconcerting” that the test would not include bank-by-bank results. In a Tuesday letter to Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell and Quarles, Sens. Brian Schatz, Sherrod Brown and Elizabeth Warren said “transparency surrounding the results of the tests is a bedrock principle of the stress testing framework.”

“This decision could undermine confidence in the banking system,” the senators wrote.

The letter also raised concerns about bank capital requirements being tied to the results of the traditional stress test from earlier this year. Not basing those requirements off the coronavirus-specific sensitivity analysis, the senators wrote, could lead to “lower than appropriate” guidelines that don’t match the current reality.

Failing to disclose the individual results of each bank could also mask weaker financial institutions from needed scrutiny, said Gregg Gelzinis, a senior policy analyst for the Center for American Progress, who called the decision a “critical weakness.”

“This is going to undermine the usefulness of the results,” Gelzinis said.

Eight of the country’s biggest banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, had already suspended buybacks earlier this year as the economy slowed down due to the coronavirus. But bank CEOs have defended their need to continue dividends.

“From our perspective, our dividend is sound, and we plan on continuing to pay it,” Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat told CNBC this week.

Among America’s biggest banks, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo have paid out the most in dividends to shareholders since 2008, about $80 billion each, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence data. Bank of America and Citigroup paid out about $52 billion and $30 billion, respectively, during that period.

Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf said in April that dividends were important to shareholders: “If they [companies] have ability to pay, it’s the right thing to do,” he said.

Still, given such extreme uncertainty about the economy’s future, advocates say the Fed should be more stringent. Dennis Kelleher, chief executive of Better Markets, which advocates stronger market regulation, said the Fed shouldn’t allow any capital distributions by banks for at least a year.

“These aren’t just stress tests for Wall Street banks. These are credibility tests for the Fed,” Kelleher said.

Some Democrats and advocacy groups have also called on federal regulators to halt regulatory rollbacks launched under the Trump administration, warning that they could weaken banks during a deep economic downturn. Separately on Thursday, the FDIC finalized a rollback of a key post-financial crisis restrictions on risky trading, known as the Volcker rule.

“Trump’s financial regulators are not letting the pandemic and the economic catastrophe get in the way of their deregulatory agenda,” Kelleher said.

The banking industry had complained for years that the rule was too cumbersome. The changes adopted by the FDIC “will allow banks to further support the economy at this challenging time for the nation,” Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association, said in a statement.

Stocks rise in volatile trading; oil snaps slide #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Stocks rise in volatile trading; oil snaps slide

Econ

Jun 26. 2020

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Claire Ballentine, Amena Saad · BUSINESS

U.S. stocks climbed the most in more than a week as investors weighed the prospects for additional stimulus against the spike in American virus cases. Crude oil snapped a two-day slide and the dollar strengthened.

The S&P 500 jumped in the last hour of trading after fluctuating for most of the session to finish up 1.1%. The index is clinging to a monthly gain after one of the highest-ever increases in U.S. cases prompted Texas and Florida to halt the next phases of the reopening of their economies. Banks surging 2.7% after regulators eased rules that will free up capital. Investors also grappled with a mixed batch of economic data, after initial jobless claims topped estimates at almost 1.5 million.

“The market is trying to digest what the timeline is, and also measuring monetary stimulus and future fiscal stimulus as well,” said Chad Morganlander, senior money manager at Washington Crossing Advisors. “There are a lot of unknowns but yet, we have to believe that the monetary backdrop as well as fiscal backdrop will support the market, so we’re a little bit more optimistic over the next 18-24 months.”

In Europe, stocks swung from a loss to close higher, with Deutsche Lufthansa AG rallying as its biggest shareholder backed a government rescue package. Shares in German fintech Wirecard AG collapsed after it filed for insolvency. Core European bonds gained.

Worries over lockdowns being reimposed and economies reopening more slowly has hurt sentiment, as investors weigh reports of new daily records for infections. Meanwhile, health leaders called on the U.K. to prepare for a possible second wave, and Australia recorded its largest spike in cases since April.

“The market really got the shivers over the prospect of a big increase in covid and maybe starting to see places that were opening up have to close up,” Margie Patel, portfolio manager at Wells Fargo Asset Management, said on Bloomberg TV. “We’ve had such a great run from the end of March it’s only inevitable that we should get at least a little step back.”

Elsewhere, stocks in Asia fell the most in almost two weeks. China and Hong Kong were shut for holidays. West Texas crude oil rose, while gold reversed an earlier gain.

These are some of the main moves in markets:

Stocks

The S&P 500 Index advanced 1.1% to 3,083.76 as of 4:04 p.m. EDT, the largest gain in more than a week.

The Dow Jones industrial average advanced 1.2% to 25,745.60, the biggest gain in more than a week.

The Nasdaq Composite Index gained 1.1% to 10,017.

Currencies

The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index advanced 0.1% to 1,218.48.

The euro decreased 0.2% to $1.1226.

The Japanese yen depreciated 0.1% to 107.12 per dollar, the weakest in more than a week.

Bonds

The yield on two-year Treasurys fell less than one basis point to 0.18%, the lowest in two weeks.

The yield on 10-year Treasurys gained less than one basis point to 0.68%.

Britain’s 10-year yield decreased four basis points to 0.154%, the lowest on record.

Commodities

West Texas Intermediate crude advanced 2.7% to $39.05 a barrel, the biggest gain in more than a week.

Gold strengthened 0.2% to $1,763.65 an ounce.

Somkid comes up with new policy to ‘energise’ Thai economy #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Somkid comes up with new policy to ‘energise’ Thai economy

Econ

Jun 26. 2020Deputy Prime Minister Somkid Jatusripitak called on state enterprises to make smart investments that make money and can help the economy.Deputy Prime Minister Somkid Jatusripitak called on state enterprises to make smart investments that make money and can help the economy.

By The Nation

At a meeting held to discuss economic stimulus measures with the Energy Ministry, Deputy Prime Minister Somkid Jatusripitak came up with an “energy to create Thailand” policy for state enterprises such as PTT and the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (Egat) to follow.

Somkid said that since there is a global slowdown due to Covid-19, PTT should adjust its approach and accelerate investment this year and the next, as well as make sure it does not miss the target. PTT should also find new sources to boost employment through options like connecting agriculture and tourism.

Meanwhile, he said, Egat is a strong organisation and has made sacrifices this year by reducing the cost of power. However, Somkid said, Egat needs to come up with ways of looking after the unemployed and further reducing the cost of electricity, natural gas, NGV and LPG. He also said that the Energy Ministry should work with the Transport Ministry to make public buses cheaper.

Meanwhile, Energy Minister Sonti Sontijirawong said his plans focus on reducing the cost of living and creating revenue for people amid the Covid-19 fallout.

Energy Minister Sontirat Sontijirawong has come up with a plan to boost grassroots economy as well as create new jobs.

Energy Minister Sontirat Sontijirawong has come up with a plan to boost grassroots economy as well as create new jobs.

The ministry has divided its stimulus measures as follows:

• Spending more than Bt40.5 billion to ease people’s burden by reducing household electricity bills, keep household gas (LPG) affordable until September (extending this subsidy to December is being considered) and providing NGV support for public vehicles until the end of July among others.

• Expediting the investment of more than Bt200 billion this year to create more than 10,000 jobs. The ministry will also launch a new round of exploration and production this year, as well as invest in modernising the grid to help Thailand become an LNG hub and study the possibility of connecting the grid to neighbouring countries.

• Spending more than Bt30 billion to stimulate the economy in post-Covid era by generating revenue for companies and creating more than 8,000 jobs. Egat will stimulate trade through online markets, communities, power plants and trips to dams and reservoirs nationwide. PTT, meanwhile, will create a Living Community Marketplace, promote domestic travel by launching a “Blue Card” and stimulate the economy through funds to promote energy conservation. There are also plans to expand power transmission lines to divert the river to the Bhumibol Dam, which should also help ease drought conditions.

Sonthirat said his ministry is planning to invest in a 700-megawatt community-based project to boost grassroots economy and expects a Cabinet approval on June 30. The ministry will then open bid for a “Quick Win” programme for 100MW from July 1, announce winners by mid-August, and start construction at the beginning of next year.

As for the 600MW general community-based power plant, it should be open for registration between October and December. This power plant is expected to create more than 10,000 jobs.

Predictions of slow recovery make Thai stocks unattractive to local investors #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Predictions of slow recovery make Thai stocks unattractive to local investors

Econ

Jun 26. 2020Samy Chaar, chief economist at Lombard Odier & CIE SA, says the bank prefers not to invest in emerging markets, especially in bank shares, energy or business sectors of the old economy. Samy Chaar, chief economist at Lombard Odier & CIE SA, says the bank prefers not to invest in emerging markets, especially in bank shares, energy or business sectors of the old economy.

By The Nation

Foreign equities are becoming more attractive to Thai investors because the Thai economy is unlikely to recover from the Covid-19 crisis any time soon, according to the Kasikornbank Private Banking Group.

Jirawat Supornpaibul, chief of the Kasikornbank Private Banking Group, said on Thursday (June 25) that the economy may start to pick up as the government relaxes lockdown restrictions, but it will take a long time before it fully recovers or returns to where it was in the pre-Covid-19 period. 

Against this backdrop, KBank Private Banking has been diversifying its investment overseas. On shore investments do not look bright due to limited options, which is why the group is shifting investments abroad, he said at a webinar on “Tracking the Recovery and the World after Covid-19”. 

He predicted that the Stock Exchange of Thailand index may rise about 5 to 10 per cent from the current level, but it will be subject to high volatility. Since the economy will recover slowly, the annual returns for Thai equity investment will be between 3 and 4 per cent or a little higher, he said, while returns from bank deposits will be even lower. 

Siriporn Suwannagarn, financial advisory head for the group, said as Covid-19 subsides, the group has cash in hand for about 5 to 11 per cent of its total portfolio and has started using it to invest in global equities and investment funds in both Asia and Europe. The group has also been investing in property funds and gold for use as hedging instruments against risks. 

Meanwhile, Samy Chaar, chief economist at Swiss Private Bank Lombard Odier & CIE SA, said global recovery will look like the Nike swoosh – initial recovery being V-shaped during the reopening of cities before the rate decelerates. He also said that it will take two to three years before the economy can return to pre-Covid levels. Inflation, meanwhile, will be low, interest rates may fall into the negative territory, and the gap between the rich and poor will become wider.

If there is a second wave of infections, then the economy will be in an L-shaped slump for a long time, he warned. 

Risks could also come from trade tensions between China and the US. Also, if many countries bring their fiscal and monetary expansions to an end too soon, then the global economy will go into recession, he said. 

With slow recovery, Lombard Odier reckons that equities and debentures will be more attractive than bank deposits and short-term debt instruments, he said.

Equities must be related to technology, especially digital industry, senior citizens and environment to name a few. 

He also advised investment in gold and government bonds until the end of the year as an insurance against market volatility. 

‘We like equities in US and Asia, especially growth stock associating with new technology, we do not like emerging market’s stocks in particularly bank shares, energy or business sectors in the old economy. We are also interested in debentures and government bonds due to increasing yields,” he said. 

For currencies, he said the Japanese yen was attractive, while US dollar may become weaker as US rates may no longer rise.

Recovery looks to be ebbing in states with virus outbreaks #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Recovery looks to be ebbing in states with virus outbreaks

Econ

Jun 26. 2020A person rides a bicycle along a nearly empty Houston Street Viaduct in Dallas, Texas, on April 15, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Rebecca Smeyne.A person rides a bicycle along a nearly empty Houston Street Viaduct in Dallas, Texas, on April 15, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Rebecca Smeyne.

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Rich Miller · NATIONAL, BUSINESS, US-GLOBAL-MARKETS 
The U.S. economic recovery is showing incipient signs of weakening in some states where coronavirus cases are mounting.

The ebbing is evident in such high-frequency data as OpenTable restaurant reservations and follows a big bounce in activity as businesses reopened from lockdowns meant to check the spread of Covid-19.

“We’re now starting to see very early evidence that things are leveling off” in some of the states that reopened first and are now suffering rising virus cases, said Michelle Meyer, head of U.S. economics at Bank of America.

The result, she said, is likely to be an uneven recovery, even as gross domestic product rapidly rebounds next quarter from what will probably be the steepest nosedive since the Great Depression. “It’s going to be fits and starts,” she said. “It’s not going to be a smooth path.”

Jobs data on Thursday reflected that. Applications for unemployment benefits were higher than forecast for a second week, clocking in at 1.48 million after an upwardly revised 1.54 million in the prior period. The median forecast called for 1.32 million. Continuing claims, however, declined more than estimated — to 19.5 million in the week ended June 13.

“The stickiness that we see in claims is a reason to be concerned,” Meyer said even before the latest report. “It tells you there’s still some firing going on” even as the economy reopens.

Among America’s most-populous states, Texas, Florida and California are experiencing a surge in coronavirus outbreaks even while others, including New York, see declines. Overall, counties accounting for between one-third and one-half of U.S. GDP are suffering from worsening trends in new cases or Covid-19-related deaths, according to research by Deutsche Bank economists.

The S&P 500 Index slumped 2.6% and Treasury yields fell on Wednesday as investors grew anxious about the economy’s prospects.

“We’re playing mediocre Whac-A-Mole” in controlling the disease, former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers said.

He told the Economic Club of New York on Wednesday that 30% of the economy will need to be shut back down — either by government decree or by people and companies acting on their own — to prevent the pandemic from getting out of control.

The fading economic momentum already evident in states with more virus cases is occurring even though the authorities there have not re-imposed shutdowns, though they may eventually do so. Instead, the shift appears to reflect increased caution by consumers and businesses in the face of the contagion.

“The public is not psychologically immune to Covid-19 and will retrench if the virus starts spreading again, regardless of government restrictions (or lack thereof),” Jefferies economists Aneta Markowska and Thomas Simons wrote Wednesday in a note to clients.

That’s particularly the case for older Americans, who are in greater danger of dying from the virus if they contract it.

“The baby boomers account for something like 30% to 35% of consumer spending in this country,” Peter Hooper, global head of economic research for Deutsche Bank, said Wednesday on Bloomberg Television. “If this virus continues to get worse, consumer spending is not going anywhere down the road.”

This, in turn, would create “real problems” for many U.S. businesses with low profit margins because they would still have to operate well below capacity due to limited consumer demand, according to JPMorgan Chase Chief U.S. Economist Michael Feroli.

Recurring coronavirus outbreaks could mean restrained economic expansion and elevated unemployment for years, according to Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans.

“My forecast assumes growth is held back by the response to intermittent localized outbreaks — which might be made worse by the faster-than-expected reopenings,” Evans said Wednesday in remarks at a virtual event.

What seems to have happened, some economists say, is that a number of states restarted their economies prematurely, paying little heed to guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That led to the earlier and stronger recovery in economic activity seen in recent national statistics. But it also raised the risk of a relapse in parts of the country as the virus flares anew.

“The bounce-back in the economy has happened,” said Summers, a Bloomberg contributor and professor at Harvard University. “We’re not going to see a lot more bouncing back until we get a vaccine.”

Fed carries funding markets over quarter with rocky path ahead #ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Fed carries funding markets over quarter with rocky path ahead

Econ

Jun 25. 2020The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building in Washington on Aug. 13, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Andrew Harrer.The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building in Washington on Aug. 13, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Andrew Harrer.

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Emily Barrett · BUSINESS, US-GLOBAL-MARKETS 

U.S. funding markets are approaching quarter-end on a remarkably sure footing, given the Treasury is still borrowing in near-record amounts, its cash pile has barely ever been larger, and the pandemic appears to be seeing a resurgence.

Even as Libor jumped the most in three months Thursday, indicators of stress in this crucial corner of financial markets — such as the spread between three-month Libor and the risk-free rate — are hovering where they were before the March upheaval. In secured funding markets, the benchmark repurchase rate remains in check, and the Federal Reserve’s overnight liquidity facilities have hardly been touched this week.

That all adds up to a big win for the Fed, though maybe not exactly mission accomplished. It’s a testament to officials’ swift and aggressive actions over the past three months that this key market is calm at what would typically be a volatile time, with banks wrapping up their books at mid-year.

The threat of a relapse heading into the second half of 2020 is reduced with ample cash in the system. The biggest risk to this hard-won equilibrium is if demand is unable to keep up with the Treasury’s borrowing needs, with more government stimulus potentially on the way.

“The really big unknown right now is that we’re at this fork in the road as far as stimulus goes,” said Blake Gwinn, a rates strategist at NatWest. “That will have a massive impact on bill supply and funding needs.”

There are signs that buyers might be starting to drift out of the safety of bills, even as supply may need to ramp up again. In particular, strategists have been eyeing outflows from government money-market funds.

While the Treasury’s cash hoard, at a near-record $1.61 trillion, has allowed it to trim bill supply, Gwinn doesn’t see major cuts on the way. Spending needs may surge again soon enough, as the administration is reportedly considering a $1 trillion infrastructure package.

There were concerns in recent weeks that the Treasury’s cash stockpile could complicate matters for the Fed at quarter-end, because of the potential for increased volatility in reserves at a time when short-term funding needs are typically more acute.

That hasn’t turned out to be the case. For one thing, the Treasury’s cash pile has dropped from last week’s historic level. Also, unlike September, when large flows tied to corporate tax payments and Treasury auction settlements crashed a system that was running close to scarcity, reserves are now abundant. That’s thanks to asset purchases and a plethora of liquidity facilities that have expanded the Fed’s balance sheet beyond $7 trillion.

“When the Fed started blowing out its balance sheet, reserves really ceased to matter,” Gwinn said. “We’re so far past that, we’re so far into reserve abundance.”

Stress indicators in the U.S. are muted so far. Three-month Libor did fix higher Thursday, in the biggest increase since March, but it’s coming off a five-year low and returning to last week’s level. The spread to overnight index swaps, the risk-free rate, rose only a fraction.

To Jon Hill, U.S. rates strategist at BMO Capital Markets, that suggests upward pressure on the benchmark “will not be durable absent a sharp correction in risk assets.”

As for secured funding markets, “heading into quarter-end, additional repo pressure could mount, but their spillover into other areas of funding markets is unlikely,” according to a report from Steven Zeng and Craig Nicol, strategists at Deutsche Bank.

The markets are “functioning well without any major dislocations” in Treasury, mortgage-backed and municipal bond markets, they said in a report dated June 18. Treasuries are maintaining a stable spread to swaps across different maturities, “suggesting stable investor demand despite increased issuance.”

Though that spread measure has jumped around somewhat in the past week, the gap between three-month T-bills and the overnight index swaps rate is still below its peak this month, and well short of the stresses seen in March and April.

Overseas, some stresses remain. The European Central Bank announced plans for a precautionary facility to provide euros to central banks outside the currency area to help ease any liquidity crunches that remain in the wake of the pandemic. And liquidity in foreign-exchange markets is still below norms, according to Guy Debelle, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia and head of the Global Foreign Exchange Committee.

NatWest’s Gwinn says that even if the course of the pandemic takes a more critical turn, exerting renewed pressure on the economy, the financial system is far better placed now to handle the risks.

“There’s a fuller understanding now of the Fed’s tolerance for funding rates to widen out,” he said. “When we went into this in March nobody had any clue that the Fed would act as quickly and as strongly as they did — now we know what their playbook is.”