20-year national strategy key to country’s integrity and economy: Prayut

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/20-year-national-strategy-key-to-countrys-integrit-30286575.html

THE junta-designed 20-year national strategy is required to promote the integrity of future national administrations, Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha said yesterday.

However, Prayut insisted that the strategy was intended only to provide a broad picture of what future governments could do to drive the Kingdom efficiently.

The premier stressed that more integrity was essential to keep the country on pace with a fast-changing world, including handling global treats.

The Kingdom must also enter the “Thailand 4.0” phase, when the country should prosper based on innovation and technology development, he said.

Prayut was speaking at a government-hosted seminar on the integrity of the country’s steering actions and reforms. About 1,000 civil servants attended the event at a Bangkok hotel while 5,000 provincial civil servants observed the seminar via video conferencing.

//

The PM said all ministries and governmental agencies had to integrate their performances together to achieve the best results. For instance, he said agencies related to technology and the economy needed to work together to efficiently drive fresh concepts for the digital economy.

He expected Thailand to work towards a value-added, environmentally friendly agricultural industry rather than pure agriculture like in previous eras. The government’s concept of Pracha Rath (People and State Working Together) was required to develop industry from the grassroots. It also forced villagers to be economically independent.

His Majesty the King’s sufficiency economy philosophy will be maintained as the country’s guideline for the economy, he said.

He urged Thais not to split politically so the country would be best placed to respond to a business-based world. “There are no sides now in this modern age. All countries need to do trade deals with each other. So why are we splitting ourselves?” he asked.

Prayut warned that Thailand must not “fall into its own traps”, referring to challenges such as the long-standing middle-income trap, the lack of skilled labour, social inequality and the ageing society.

He spoke of Thailand’s potential as an Asean hub and rich economic opportunities in the region.

Prayut also promised that the government’s plans must be carried out without corruption and he would not “play soft” against wrongdoers.

At the seminar, Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan emphasised the importance of national security in moving the country forward.

Prawit admitted that after the coup Thailand was no longer a democratic country but said the government was trying to restore democracy.

He said he felt thankful that the prime minister decided to end the country’s unrest two years ago by staging the coup, which allowed it to get out of deadlock.

“To move the country forward, we have to build trust among the people. And to build trust, security work is key,” said Prawit, who is also the defence minister. He added that security bodies and concerned stakeholders had been integrated to secure people’s safety and the country’s sovereignty since the coup.

The National Security Council works with the Border Patrol Police and immigration authorities and administration bodies to chart working plans, he said, and the Internal Security Operations Command is in charged of implementing security plans.

The junta also focuses on military cooperation with the international community, he said, adding that Thai military attaches have been sent abroad to strengthen military ties with other countries. He asked civil servants to intensively tackle drug, crime in general and natural disaster issues.

Deputy Prime Minister Prajin Juntong recounted the government’s achievements over the past two years, highlighting the Pracha Rath scheme and saying it called on the public and private sectors to work together in planning and implement projects.

He said the government expected that by middle of next year the public and private sectors would start working together in the scheme.

The government hosted the seminar to create an understanding among civil servants and the public regarding the regime’s administration and reform plans.

 

EC set to launch PR campaign covering August 7 referendum

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/EC-set-to-launch-PR-campaign-covering-August-7-ref-30286578.html

NEW CHARTER AND REFERENDUM

THE Election Commission (EC) will kick off its public relations campaign tomorrow on the August 7 referendum by disseminating its first batch of constitution-related documents via the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) and the National Legislative Assembly (NLA).

The batch consists of 100,000 copies of the document, with 50,000 given to the CDC and the NLA each for further distribution at “democratic promotion” centres, EC deputy secretary-general Thanit Sriprathet said. He took the media on a tour of the EC’s printing house in Pathum Thani yesterday.

Each package has four documents including a complete draft of the constitution, two summaries and an explanation on the NLA’s extra question regarding senators’ role in selecting a prime minister.

About 900,000 more copies of the package are being prepared for nationwide distribution next month, the deputy secretary-general |said.

Another 17 million booklets summarising content of the charter draft and explaining the NLA’s additional question, as well as information relating to the referendum process, will be distributed to voters 15 days before the August 7 vote.

The total cost of the operation would be Bt30 million less than the EC had estimated earlier, Thanit said. Voters have more than one month to study the constitution before the referendum takes place, he said.

Meanwhile, Thailand’s digital television association submitted a letter to Election Commissioner Somchai Srisuthiyakorn asking for details about when EC-sponsored programmes regarding the referendum and the constitution should be aired.

13-episode series

The EC earlier announced it would produce a 13-episode public relations series to be aired from 6.20pm to 6.50pm on Monday and Wednesday on every TV channel starting on |June 27.

However, the association expressed concern that airing the programme at the same time on all channels would limit people’s exposure as they could be occupied during that window of time.

The association has asked that channels have the discretion to select the programming slots on their own.

In a related development, the CDC has instructed officials from the Interior Ministry to postpone training sessions for district-level volunteers, known as the “Kru Khoh” or “Teacher B” group, pending instructions.

However, the training must still be completed by June 7, CDC spokesman Chatchai na Chiangmai said.

Some citizens not impressed by junta’s performance

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Some-citizens-not-impressed-by-juntas-performance-30286503.html

It’s been two years since Thais started charting a new course in the post-coup era. The Nation’s JUTHATHIP LUCKSANAWONG talks to ordinary people about how they view their changed lives and the way forward on the new road towards “true democracy”.

KIATANANTHA LOUNKAEW, ECONOMICS DEAN AT DHURAKIJ PUNDIT UNIVERSITY AND DIRECTOR OF ITS RESEARCH CENTRE

The junta apparently lacks or has not shown a clear vision for handling the economy, which is affecting business, so those running the country now cannot see clearly the direction the country will go. No matter which government takes office, SMEs in particular, have to make quick adjustments to survive in the competitive market. But most Thai entrepreneurs couldn’t do so, so they couldn’t compete with their domestic and overseas rivals.

Although it was good that the government launched policies such as SME soft loans, it has failed to manage unregistered SME accounts to be in line with the system, so they still can’t take full advantage of the policy.

“If the non-registered companies are not supported and only big SMEs are bolstered, the gap between the strong and weak companies will appear bigger, and the strong companies will then control the market,” he said.

//

The regime’s short-term policy to boost the economy did not benefit the country in the long run. The policy mentioned including extended holiday periods aimed at encouraging people to spend their money and boost the domestic economy. The higher personal consumption during the extended holiday periods resulted in the fastest GDP growth in three years – 3.2 per cent in the first quarter of this year. However, people might have money for shopping only early in the year. At the year-end, their purchasing power would decline.

“It’s impossible for the state to help everyone. People in all sectors should adapt and rely on themselves. If we just wait for the regime to feed us, the country will go nowhere,” he said.

SOMCHAI SEWANAPHON, 57, A TEACHER AND FARMER IN THE SOUTH’S PHATTHALUNG PROVINCE

The current economic policy focus appears to favour only certain groups.

“That policy only benefits the rich and government servants who have purchasing power, but not farmers, the majority of Thais,” he said.

The quality of life of people in the province was increasingly deteriorating in the past two years due to falling crop prices.

“Most people are rubber, rice and fruit farmers. Prices of the crops are lower and they are unsold, as the local people do not have money to buy goods,” he said.

The locals have less money due to higher household debts and less income. Some students have had to drop out because their parents can’t afford to put them through school.

The villagers think that it’s partly because of the global economic slowdown, but the government doesn’t do much to help farmers.

“We feel there is such a big gap between the locals and the state. The military regime does not care about us like in the past,” he said.

SAMA-AE JEHMUDOR, 62, CHIEF OF A THAI FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATION FROM SOUTH’S PATTANI PROVINCE

Local fishermen have been affected by the regime’s tough actions – launching fisheries-related legal action without inclusive discussions with concerned people.

The government rushes the work to quell illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing following the European Union’s warning and imposes more stringent measures to seize certain fishing gear and boats.

However, the government’s laws fail to effectively crack down on illegal practices by fat cat fisheries, and instead obstruct local fishermen from making a living.

“If the regime wants to solve the IUU issues, they should listen to the people who make a living in this industry rather than listen to those who just sit in an office,” he said.

Over the past year, the insurgency has also appeared more intense.

“We just hope that the regime can find the right solution to tackle this prolonged conflict,” he said.

NUTCHANART THANTHONG, 48, CHIEF OF A THAI SLUM COMMUNITY GROUP IN SAMUT PRAKAN

Slum dwellers nationwide are experiencing more intense eviction. The regime has made hasty efforts to boost investment and facilitate property developers, so several crowded communities had been relocated.

“No land for us anymore. “We have to collect everyone’s money to find a new place for our community, as the compensation received from the government is not enough for them to buy a house individually,” she said.

In the past two years, people in many rundown neighbourhoods had been unfairly exiled. She and her companions held a public talk in 2014. The regime never listened to the poor.

“It ended up that we were taken to a police station for hours. The police said we couldn’t carry out such an activity, as it would violate the orders of the National Council for Peace and Order. They asked me if I had got involved in any political groups,” she said.

“I turned to them for justice. Why did they have to link me to political issues?” she asked,

Plainclothes officers have kept observing around her house for four months since their release. “I know the lives of my next generation will be more difficult as the state has put us aside,” she said.

WISIT ITTHIWARAPORNKUL, A BUSINESSMAN IN THE SOUTH’S PHUKET PROVINCE

Over the last two years, the government has failed to take care of crop prices. It focused on tourism. However, many problems had ensued.

Tourism entrepreneurs have made a major adjustment due to the government policy to welcome waves of Chinese visitors.

Chinese entrepreneurs have also come to take over resorts and hotels in the province at a cheap price but with a long-term contact.

To deal with the issue, Thai owners have had to give in, as Chinese entrepreneurs can guarantee that they will bring their tourists to the hotels and Thai owners don’t want to risk lower number of Western visitors.The government did not impose rules to regulate this issue, which might inflict on the country.

The government should be cautious and consider the results of the regime’s decisions and actions. Their actions affect the country.

THITINAN WANNASAN, A POLICEMAN IN THE NORTHEAST’S NAKHON RATCHASIMA PROVINCE

“The police and concerned bodies put more effort into rearranging social order, cracking down on corruption, encroachment and the influencers. “But concrete results still remain to be seen,” he said.

SUTHIN AMTADE, A BUSINESSMAN FROM THE NORTH’S CHIANG MAI PROVINCE

The corruption issues in local administrative bodies have appeared to decline following the coup, possibly because officials fear the regime’s crackdown on corruption.

RANGSIMAN ROME, 24, A GRADUATE STUDENT

“My life has been changed a lot.” At this time last year, Rangsiman, who was a senior, led his group to stage symbolic activities opposition to the regime and he then was charged. After he graduated, he decided against finding a job, as he had planned.

He is now pursuing a master’s degree in law and still leads activist groups.

“I have to fight for justice, principles and real democracy as it is my and my dear friends’ duty to eliminate this abnormal phenomenon.”

“My family has increasing been worried about my safety and future. However, I have to carry on in a bid to bring back democracy to my next generation.”

 

Key players still divided on takeover and the way forward.

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Key-players-still-divided-on-takeover-and-the-way–30286504.html

2 YEARS AFTER COUP

pic

Leading political figures were involved in a special report on Thepchai Yong’s “Primetime” programme on Nation TV 22. They cast their minds back to the country’s situation pre-coup and talk about what needs to happen now.

Suthep Thaugsuban, chairman of the People’s Democratic Reform Foundation

“Regarding the May 22 incident, I looked at the atmosphere on that day and believe it was hard to go on. Then-Army chief General Prayut Chan-o-cha sought cooperation from many parties but did not receive it. I suggested to Prayut that the UDD [United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship] and PDRC [People’s Democratic Reform Committee] hold talks, in case there could be a way out. I suggested that the country has come this far, we had better join hands by setting up a government of the people and find a neutral person to become the PM. The UDD asked me who the neutral person was. I said General Prayut. If this were the case, the people would give cooperation and allow him to run the country, reform the country and write the charter and then hold an election. But the UDD had to wait for orders and could not accept my proposal. I came back to report … the talk had failed.

Do not jump to a conclusion that the two large parties walk separate ways over the democracy paths. If the two major parties walk separate ways, it is not dangerous. But if two major parties look at the same angles, this is dangerous. I hope that the two large parties will not team up to fight the military.

It is hard to speculate which party would win the next election but politicians must improve themselves to meet the desires of the people. We still have the chance to see political parties belong to the people and the people participate by selecting MP candidates. I still have hopes that politics will improve. I insist that I will not return to become neither a politician nor an MP of any party because today I am already in the people’s politics sector.”

Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva

“I do not look at it as to whether the NCPO [National Council for Peace and Order] and political parties can get along. I understand that one: the country is in turmoil and politicians are to blame and must take responsibility; two: society cannot run away from political parties and politicians, as finally it has to face the roles played by parties and politicians.

But society must differentiate between good and bad politicians and support old and new-generation politicians to be in the procedures that are useful to society. They should oppose behaviours that seek vested interests and destroy a [democratic] system.

The NCPO and political parties should understand one another more. The NCPO should understand what the roles of parties and politicians are in the short and long terms. Parties and politicians must realise why the country has to be in special circumstances and how they should take responsibility. Both sides must realise that the country must move forward to something better and how should each side play their roles.”

Justice Minister General Paiboon Koomchaya

“I said from the beginning, the term ‘seize power’ – actually we want to use the term to solve the problems. I believe we must do it because that day we saw that the government totally failed to function. It was faced with charter and legal obstacles. The major issue was society was in strife and [there was] no peace and order.

I insist that we were forced by the situation and we did not have a plan. We thought and asked ourselves all the time how the situation would turn out and would we have to take action. We did not have a detailed plan. Finally we were forced to jump into it. We may have thought out a plan in a short period that when the situation was stuck, we would do it, regardless of whatever happens.

I told General Prayut, the situation could not go on. I believed no agency could solve the problems, if we did not untie the knots. Everything was untangled. I told Prayut that he was going to retire soon. If he did not untie the knots, things would be left this way. I told Prayut to make the decision.

I do not want to argue but we work hard. The PM set a timeframe for the new government to follow the road map. We had thought that what the government and the NCPO planned was good but now it is debatable. I do not want to argue but I foresee that we must move further for some time and this has nothing to do with holding on to power.

Today people appreciate General Prem [Tinsulanonda] because he built and re-regulated the country for some time during which we had a perfect democracy that went in line with our country’s context. We hope that the NCPO would be able to follow in the footsteps of General Prem and continue his legacy. But many things disappear and change after we have a full-fledged democracy.

If the charter draft does not pass a public referendum, I will leave, and you shall find your ruler. If the people do not have faith in what I wrote for, why should I stay? I will not stay.”

Former justice minister Chaikasem Nitisiri

“I think there was no turning point on May 22, 2014. I believe the incident was well prepared. Suppose, the caretaker government resigned, who would carry out the government roles? Others who took the place of the government must resort to special power because there was no law indicating such an option. The only option was to seize power to have the sovereign power and set up a government.

The turning point could be that the military helped the government to complete the general election.

Looking at the charter draft provisions, the new elected government will have difficulties working, except if the government can get along with the people in power now. The issue about the five-year transitional period is about the request to extend the period of work.”

Pheu Thai caretaker secretary-general Phumtham Wechayachai

“If every sector upholds democratic rules and respects the people’s decision, everyone knows the atmosphere of the country and knows what are the problems that caused the country to stumble and cannot walk further [and] every sector must go to the polls. It is that simple.

The national security sector can hold a general election as it has power and the support of the four forces [Air Forces, Navy, Army and police]. If it complies with the constitution and adheres to the constitution’s intentions, I believe the country can move forward. What happened was GeneralPrayut seized all powers and chose the path that he wants.

I still have one question in my mind because I am not sure that the coup that was staged was an accident or a necessity that the people in power believe it is the solution.

If General Prayut thinks that a solution is to give the people the chance to decide, democracy can help move the country forward and there could be more options for solutions.

Actually, the question should be posed to General Prayut. What is he thinking?

By letting the country be in this situation, it makes it hard to solve the country’s problems and the country’s future is doomed.

The Pheu Thai Party has offered a lot of comments.

General Prayut can put the atmosphere under control but he should possess a more open mind and allow every sector to express opinions within the frame. I believe lecturers, groups of professionals and political parties are ready to present their views with reasons so that society can make a judgement in making the decision.”

United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship co-leader Tida Thavornseth

“That day when the UDD and the PDRC held talks, there was not a discussion about a neutral PM as Suthep has claimed – that he was going to present General Prayut [with the proposal] to accept to be the neutral PM.

A provisional chapter that allows some bodies to be in power for five years has been written.

Suppose that the charter draft passes a public referendum, the country will have two charters because the interim charter is still enforced including the NCPO’s orders and announcements.

So we have the coup group’s orders, the coup group’s interim charter, and the charter that passed the referendum. It is nothing short of three tiers. I want to brand this the double-tiers charter, which is the charter that has both conservative and military authoritarianism.

The military still has full power and will be in power over a long period, which is guaranteed by the charter and provisional chapters.

Besides, it will be in power through the 20-year strategies in the reform section [of the charter].”

Democracy activists slam junta failures

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Democracy-activists-slam-junta-failures-30286506.html

COUP ANNIVERSARY

An anti-coup New Democracy Movement activist speaks yesterday at an activity to mark the second anniversary of the coup. The activity drew at least 500 participants to the Tha Phra Chan campus of Bangkok’s Thammasat University.

An anti-coup New Democracy Movement activist speaks yesterday at an activity to mark the second anniversary of the coup. The activity drew at least 500 participants to the Tha Phra Chan campus of Bangkok’s Thammasat University.

Two pro-democracy activist groups denounced the junta-backed government for their scant success despite two years of total authority following the 2014 coup.

The Young People for Social-Democracy (YPD) group in Thailand and the student-based New Democracy Movement (NDM) hosted separate events as reminders of the 2014 coup this day.

At the October 14 Memorial, the YPD slammed the junta for failing to achieve any concrete goals despite enjoying sweeping powers. Such power even appears to have been misused, the group said, such as forcing villagers out of their long-inherited forest lands.

“The junta said this is a part of their reform plan to crack down on forest encroachment. But it turns out that the villagers have been much more affected than the real encroaching fat cats,” the YPD statement said

The group also blamed the junta for mismanaging national resources.

//

The YPD secretary-general, Sura Kaewkohsaba, said the junta also abused laws and human rights by arbitrarily detaining critics.

“People cannot check the junta’s use of power,” Sura said, “and it seems that this power alone acts illegally, more than anything else that people do.”

“The junta said they needed to seize power to bring about national reforms,” added YPD member Chatchai Kadum “But they apparently have failed to do so because they haven’t allowed public discussion on the subject at all.”

Sura said the YPD is an international organisation with at least 130 country members.

Meanwhile, at nearby Thammasat University’s Tha Prachan campus, the NDM organised a march to Democracy Monument to mark the junta’s second anniversary of power seizure, calling them to return power to the citizens.

“We ask the junta to listen to us. That’s all we want,” said key NDM member Rangsiman Rome.

Three officers from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) spoke to plainclothes police officers who had come to observe the march, before it began.

They declined to speak to media at the scene.

However, Jeremy Laurence, Public Information Officer of the OHCHR Regional Office for Southeast Asia, told The Nation, “We have to ensure that Thai people can exercise their right to peaceful assembly.”

There was danger of a clash when the protesters were confronted by a pro-junta group, consisting of at least five people, when they reached the Monument. Police, however, stepped in to prevent a clash between the two groups.

Last year, on the first anniversary of the coup, the YPD was banned by the junta for attempting to read a statement at the memorial, opposing the junta’s intervention. Members of the YPD and the NDM last year were also arrested after they staged an anti-coup demonstration at the Bangkok Art and Culture Centre.

 

Charter specialists face uphill road against opponents

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Charter-specialists-face-uphill-road-against-oppon-30286507.html

SPECIAL REPORT

The 477 specialists who have completed a two-day course on the draft charter’s contents in Bangkok could have a daunting task ahead of them as they pass on the message at the district and village levels and meet with charter opponents.

The 477 “Kru Kor” representatives include five representatives from each of 76 provinces, 20 from Bangkok, and 77 from the Community Organisations Development Institute, comprising one from each province.

Although the training on Wednesday and Thursday went smoothly, the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) was unable to clarify some questions posed by the specialists.

The specialists include members of professional groups, students, public administrators and political activists who wanted to know in detail how the charter would be implemented.

For instance, Phetchabun specialists asked the CDC about human rights, finding that rights would be restricted in some cases.

//

The CDC could only console them with the hope that fully fledged human rights could be forthcoming, as the National Reform and Steering Assembly is still active.

Specialists also inquired about educational opportunities, as many parents are concerned that their children will not enjoy free education at the secondary school level.

The CDC said the charter focused on supporting pre-school children so that they could grow up with a quality educational foundation, but the state would also draft policies for alternative education.

Specialist from the southern provinces asked whether local government officials would be elected or appointed and whether local agencies would be dissolved.

The CDC said the decision would depend on the desire of people in local administrative organisations.

Specialists with political interests raised concerns that the new election system would deprive voters of the right to pick MPs in circumstances where voters dislike their constituency MP but favour the MP’s political party.

The CDC said the new election system was designed to force political parties to field qualified candidates in an election. The proportional election system strikes a fair balance between popular and less popular political parties, the commission said.

Many also raised questions about voters being deprived of the right to vote for senators, since the National Council for Peace and Order could be empowered to select the first batch of senators. The CDC said the condition would only apply during the transitional period.

CDC chairman Meechai Ruchupan asked specialists who favour a particular political party to put aside their political preferences and refrain from persuading voters either to approve or turn down the charter.

The specialists are believed to be facing an uphill battle if district and village leaders are charter opponents.

The CDC’s attempts to arrange for the specialist training have also run across activists and academics who oppose the charter.

However, the opponents did not seem to irritate CDC first vice chairman Supoj Kaimook, who yesterday said they are “too much of fuss” and “irk us as much as pebbles rolling in our shoes”.

“Their movements reflect their original bias against the charter,” he said.

However, the CDC still needs to monitor the charter situation closely, he said, adding that the commission had not attempted to employ specialists as canvassers.

“They will merely explain contents to people without guiding [them] to any exact decision,” he said.

Chatchai Na Chiangmai, another CDC member, agreed that the specialist campaign should proceed smoothly despite opposition movements.

Although deeming those movements “theoretically practicable”, Chatchai asked the public to think twice before trusting charter critics.

The charter was designed to solve national problems and move the country forward, “unlike critics from many sides that try to dump us without considering our situation and problems in the past at all”, he said.

The specialists will be tasked with educating an addition 8,780 district specialists.

Those local specialists will receive training after the Election Commission finishes publishing a simplified version of the charter, he said.

The CDC’s committee on public relations and surveys would discuss the preparation of training programmes with the Interior Ministry, said Chatchai, who chairs the committee.

The CDC would also conduct field visits and monitor training, he added.

 

Yingluck urges junta to return rights, freedom

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Yingluck-urges-junta-to-return-rights-freedom-30286508.html

pic

Former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra expressed concerns on performance of the ruling junta authority who removed her government from office on this day in 2014.

“I would like to ask them whether the reconciliation process has been inclusive and if it’s going in the right direction or not,” Yingluck said on her Facebook page today.

” I also hope that the National Council for Peace and Order will accelerate the implementation of reforms that will move the country back towards path to democracy as specified by their own roadmap,” she said.

She also urged the NCPO to urgently address problems facing the people. “I have growing concerns because today, people are suffering from economic hardship, poverty and critical social issues including increasing drug use,” she said.

The stripped ex-PM recalled when the junta justified the coup by claiming that her government could no longer govern the country and they needed to come to proceed with reconciliation process.

“It was also the day that the people’s rights and freedom were taken away,” she said “I wish that they will swiftly return happiness to the people. By happiness, I mean the basic rights and freedom that will allow the people to once again choose their own destiny,”

“This will ensure that the past two years would not have been wasted,” she added “I remain hopeful that this will be the case,”

Pheu Thai-backed Yingluck, who became the PM in 2011 via election, was stripped from her acting post as the coup entered to “put an end” to the then-intense political protests, starting in 2013 following her government’s attempt to pass the blanketing amnesty bill.

Yingluck is still now challenged by the military-installed government for the rice-pledging scheme as she chaired the rice committee by then.

PM says Russia deal needed

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/PM-says-Russia-deal-needed-30286441.html

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha yesterday defended his government’s plan to buy Russian-made helicopters, saying that the purchase would be between the governments of both countries and would be free from irregularity.

Speaking to reporters at Suvarnabhumi Airport after returning from his Russian visit, General Prayutsaid Thailand needed new helicopters for military purposes as well as civilian affairs such as evacuations and fighting wildfires. “We have to buy necessary stuff from other countries because we cannot manufacture them,” he said.

The prime minister also said Thailand was more interested in joining the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) than the United States-led Trans-Pacific Partnership. It was because joining EEU was easier and there was no obligation, he added. Prayut said he would make sure Thailand would not be in a disadvantage by joining EEU. “If we don’t join them, we won’t be able to trade with them,” he said.

Academics dub current charter draft ‘enemy of democracy’

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Academics-dub-current-charter-draft-enemy-of-democ-30286442.html

pic

ACADEMICS have labelled the constitution draft an enemy of democracy that would limit people’s rights and liberty.

“The problem with democracy in Thailand in the past 10 years lies in how the winning majority abuse and distort power … The powers that be are now trying to resolve it by degrading instead of strengthening it [democracy],” said Kasian Tejapira, a political science professor at Thammasat University.

He spoke at a public seminar titled “Constitution and Referendum That Can Be Chosen” at Thammasat University’s Tha Prachan Campus yesterday.

Kasian noted that during the Shinawatra governments, abuse of power was seen when the Yingluckgovernment attempted to pass the amnesty bill and the Thaksin government chose violence to wage the war on drugs.

He said the power struggle in the country over the past decade reflected the elites’ attempt to transit the country to non-democracy.

“But they want to preserve elections … So, what we are facing is the regime with elections but without democracy,” the professor said.

He explained that it was an attempt to give power, which theoretically belonged to the winning majority, to the minority. The means might vary, but a constant theme has emerged.

Under the shot-down constitution draft by Borwornsak Uwanno’s panel, the power given to the winning majority was transferred to some moral body or the so-called “good people”, the academic said.

For the current charter draft by Meechai Ruchuphan, such power would go to a juridical body and the Army, Kasian said, adding that those winning an election would have no power despite people voting for them.

“This trend is also reflected in Meechai’s recent remark that democracy is not about empowering the people, but about the best interests of the people,” he said.

Baramee Chairat, a coordinator of Thailand’s Assembly of the Poor, said Thai constitutions were generally not friendly towards the underprivileged. Only the 1997 Constitution allowed people to take part in the process of writing it and was the only charter called “the people’s constitution”.

He slammed the current charter for wanting to put limitations on people’s rights as it stipulated that people were free to enjoy rights and freedoms as long as doing so did not affect the country’s security.

“Well, this charter by Meechai is suggesting that we can exercise rights when it doesn’t rock the state. In the 1997 charter, to the contrary, it said that the state can exercise its rights when it doesn’t rock the people,” Baramee said.

Detrat Sukkamnerd, an economic professor from Kasetsart University, said the rights or welfare given to the people in the charter draft was like charity.

He pointed out that access to education was a fundamental right that everyone had equally. However, in the constitution draft it states it is the state’s duty to provide education to people for only 12 years, he said.

“When people said that it should be 15 years, they [the government] said they could give that [the extra three years] because the state had enough budget. It is almost like we have to feel grateful for such charity when education is a right,” he said.

Was the coup worth it?

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Was-the-coup-worth-it-30286443.html

2ND ANNIVERSARY

Junta restored peace and order but political reform yet to be seen; critics say regime has silenced opposing voices

TWO YEARS AGO today the military led by General Prayut Chan-o-cha declared a coup d’etat and took power after months of political turmoil that was about to tear the country apart.

Citing immediate unrest, national divide and politicians’ abuse of power, the coup-makers, officially known as National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), vowed to unravel the political knots by ensuring peace and order, and undertaking reforms.

Two years have past and there is one more year to go before the “road map to democracy” reaches its end.

Outwardly at least, people are able to lead quite normal lives – no demonstrators are on the street paralysing the country. Attempts have been made to bring about reconciliation and reform. Several working bodies such as panels to write a new constitution and a reform assembly have been set up to provide necessary mechanisms to give the country a fresh start after the next election.

But how successful are these bodies and will we really get a democracy at the end of these paths?

The answers, by the agents involved and political analysts, vary depending on the issues at hand.

Alongkorn Ponlaboot, a veteran politician who has sat on both the defunct and the current reform bodies, claimed that the Prayut regime has impressively accomplished its goal to create a great reform plan that will change the country politically, economically, and socially.

“The blueprint for change has been drawn, 48 reform plans have been submitted to the government for further implementation, and a 20-year national strategy is underway,” the vice president of the National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA) said.

He said that by the election next year, most of these plans would be ready for the next government to implement. The plans cover priorities such as measures against corruption, one of the country’s biggest problems.

Alongkorn praised the junta chief Prayut for his dedication and strong will to bring about reform unlike other coup-makers. “He does not have to do this, but he does. I think that’s very admirable,” Alongkorn said.

pic

Prayad Phungchampa, the deputy secretary-general of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), agreed that the regime has a strong will to bring about reform and is serious about curbing graft. A good foundation had been laid out under this government that could be carried out into the future, Prayad said.

Laws and regulations, including clauses in the new charter, have been passed that would enhance the work of the anti-graft agency in combating corruption, he said. And over the past two years, special powers have been deployed to facilitate investigations.

“Those suspected to be involved in corruption are transferred via the use of Article 44 out of embattled areas. This makes investigations much easier,” he said.

But, in the eyes of those calling for reform, the NCPO could have done much better.

People’s Democratic Reform Foundation (PDRF) spokesman Akanat Promphan, who has been a key member since the movement was active in 2013 and 2014, said crucial reforms could be carried out in a short period of time, if the powers-that-be were decisive and determined.

“The NCPO has done a good job writing all the reform plans and resolving some immediate problems such as human trafficking and overpriced lotteries in the past two years… But, I think there are other important points that they could have covered,” he said. “Reform of politics, decentralisation, and [reform of] the police should be undertaken.”

Akanat said he understood that the regime had faced a lot of international pressure. But he hoped that in the remaining year these matters would be dealt with.

“If by the next election political reform is not successful, we’ll just go back to the same vicious cycle,” he said, referring to the violent protests over the past decade.

But he said it was hard to judge if overall reforms had been fruitful.

“There is a lot that we haven’t seen yet … The fate of the [new] constitution is still uncertain and its organic laws haven’t even come into existence yet,” Akanat said. “The change in the political structure that people called for is based on that. So, we’ll just have to wait and see.”

Another reform advocate Suriyasai Katasila, was direct in saying the NCPO’s record in undertaking reformhad been unsatisfactory.

“On a short-term basis, they did well in coping with immediate issues like corruption problems that lingered since the previous government, [plus] human trafficking issues, and lotteries,” he said. “But for the medium- and long-term, they haven’t really done enough considering it has been two years [since the coup] already,” he said.

“Police reform, for instance, is something that I don’t see when most people agree that this institution needs refinement,” he said.

The remaining year would be a key test for the regime, Suriyasai said. If things continued like present, the three years under the military-led regime would be seen as a lost opportunity [to bring about change]. Like Akanat, he hoped more changes and reforms would be undertaken in the NCPO’s final year.

“They have the power to do this and they should. If next year is still the same, things will go back to how it was before the coup in 2014,” he said.

527 people arrested, 114 charged

In terms of maintaining peace and order, the regime’s record appears impressive, on the surface. There have been no major street protests like in 2013 and 2014, when parts of Bangkok were blocked. But critics say the regime may confuse peace with silence.

According to Internet Law Reform Dialogue, or iLaw, since the power seizure at least 992 people have been summoned or received a visit by the military. At least 527 have been arrested, with 67 individuals charged with lese majeste and 47 charged with sedition.

Anusorn Unno, a lecturer at Thammasat University and a member of the Thai Academic Network for Civil Rights, argues that the regime’s concept of peace is wrong.

Anusorn said occasional political gatherings over the past two years were not “unrest” or a threat to national security. Rather, they were symptoms of persistent conflict that has not abated.

“The measures against gatherings are not for the sake of national security, it is suppression of one political faction,” he said.

Instead of settling the conflict, he said the NCPO had become a part of it – and even worsened the situation by created negative feelings for people who are against the current regime.

While the regime had managed to silence opposing voices, but when opportunities come, they would “explode” either through votes in the upcoming referendum on the constitution or the election next year, the academic said.

Meanwhile, attempts have been made to set up reconciliation panels under reform assemblies, which have been trying to find ways for people with different ideologies to co-exist. Their plans include repealing legal cases related to political rallies over the past 10 years, in the hope that this could give everyone a chance to reassess what they have done, apologise, and start again.

However, peace, order and reconciliation are somewhat tricky and efforts to unify the country have been hard to achieve since the coup.