Govt lays out 12-year plan to better manage water resources

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Govt-lays-out-12-year-plan-to-better-manage-water–30283868.html

A 12-YEAR plan to manage water resources has been drawn up by the government to sustainably overcome drought crises, Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha said yesterday, in the 24th government newsletter.

He stressed that water management should not be as inefficient as it has been in the past because the stability of water supplies was a key factor in the national economy and society.

The government was also applying royal guidance to the plan, aiming to balance production systems and usage in every capacity, the prime minister said.

Royal guidance in regard to protecting and restoring natural resources and the development of society by building people’s self-reliance had been successful, he said, as demonstrated by 4,000 water-resource development projects.

The government would employ Pracha Rath, or “state of people”, projects to link value chains together, Prayut said.

The Pracha Rath mechanism is meant to ensure that economic reforms integrate with the agricultural and industrial sectors.

Prayut also urged concerned parties to cooperate, adding that he promised not to leave any sector behind.

The plan comes as a harsh drought severely affects the country. Prayut said the government had determined the water cycle was disturbed, leading to imbalances and eventually the drought.

He said previous uncontrolled agricultural policies had led to the destruction of 10 million rai (1.6 million hectares) of forest and water resources.

Water resources had been abused for the benefit of particular groups, Prayut added, and agriculture, which accounted for 71 per cent of water use nationwide, had been affected.

Prayut and Abhisit spar over draft referendum

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Prayut-and-Abhisit-spar-over-draft-referendum-30283873.html

Prayut

Prayut

PM insists appointed senate may be needed to ‘ensure’ best leader is selected.

AN APPOINTED Senate might be essential to “help ensure” the best possible leader is selected, Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha said yesterday.

“People have chosen their premiers, and look what happened,” Prayut said during his weekly news briefing. “Some of them have even been prosecuted.”

The additional question in the referendum proposed by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) will ask if the Senate handpicked by the junta should be allowed to choose the new premier, together with elected MPs, to lead the next government for a five-year transitional period.

“The NLA said the question should be asked because the next government may not be trusted,”Prayut said.

“You should not ask me about this. You should rather ask the next government to promise what they will do.”

The additional question has been criticised by members of the public and politicians, includingDemocrat Party leader and the former premier Abhisit Vejjajiva, who said on Sunday that his party would vote against it.

If the Senate is empowered to take part in the vote for the next PM it will create an imbalance in the legislature, Abhisit said. He added that he hoped Prayut would understand that point, as the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) had earlier told charter drafters that a handpicked Senate should not be allowed to choose the PM.

However, Prayut, who is also head of the NCPO, said the proposal was completed. “It was already considered by the charter drafters and the drafting is done already.”

It would not always be necessary that the handpicked Senate would inherit such power, the PM said.

But he refused to give clear reactions to both the referendum question and the charter draft. The matters had been decided by the NLA and the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) respectively, he said.

Silent on alternative draft

Prayut also remained silent on what would happen if the charter draft is rejected in the referendum. He explained that doing so could influence the way that people will vote in the referendum if another plan was revealed “too soon”.

No one could say the public needed to know everything about the charter draft and an alternative plan had to be revealed, he said.

“Only 40 per cent of people will follow up on the draft so don’t say it will be for public benefit.”

Meanwhile, Abhisit insisted yesterday he would continue to talk about the charter draft despite the PM’s displeasure. He also said he would keep asking the junta to reveal what it would do if the draft were rejected in the referendum, reasoning that the money spent on holding the plebiscite should not be wasted because the public did not get sufficient details.

He asked Prayut to “calm down” and be more open-minded about opinions on the charter, as long as remarks are not aggressive or distorted.

“There is a difference between creative comments and those meant to create disruption,” Abhisit said. “I hope Prayut does not see all different commentators as his foes, or our country can’t move forward.”

The government and the NCPO should also not turn into “litigants”, he said.

The NCPO could get closer to achieving political reforms if they allowed more people to take part in the process, Abhisit said, adding that the government could open up public spaces for creative discussions on the charter draft.

Abhisit said the Democrats still rejected the extra referendum question to empower the Senate to choose a PM. If the measure was passed, he said Prayut could move from his middle position to have an NCPO-picked Senate choose the PM.

“I’m worried just as he [Prayut] is,” Abhisit said. “If you allow 250 people, all from the same source, to diminish the people’s will after an election, voters will feel that their right to vote was in vain. That will create serious conflict. Both he and I are worried that such a scene is not what Thailand wants.”

Abhisit, however, remained silent on the Democrats’ decision to vote for the charter, saying that an early revelation could create political conflict. He also insisted that the Democrats would not join hands with Pheu Thai Party, despite their similar stances against the referendum question.

Prayut also insisted that neither the NCPO nor himself planned to set up a political party, nor were they looking for future leaders in the political arena.

He also denied a report that the NCPO was looking at former deputy premier Surakiart Sathirathai to be the next PM.

Despite his furious reactions following the Democrat’s earlier announcement, Prayut insisted that he was only “annoyed” by politicians’ comments and not dissatisfied with them. “Why make bothersome comments that they don’t realise?” he said.

Army chief General Teerachai Nakwanich yesterday criticised political parties that had announced opposition to the charter draft as not respecting people.

“They must respect the people’s decision. The public should first look at the draft and make a decision on the referendum. This is the first step of democracy,” he said.

Four scenarios for two-choice referendum

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Four-scenarios-for-two-choice-referendum-30283797.html

BURNING ISSUE

The additional question in the upcoming referendum asking whether an appointed Senate should be included in the vote to select the prime minister could lead to confusion and complication among agencies concerned.

Proposed by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), the question would be tacked onto the central question of whether voters accept the draft written by the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC).

Yet things would be complicated by the inclusion of two questions on one single ballot.

According to 2014 interim charter, which was amended to allow the NLA to propose a question, if voters’ answer to the additional question is not in line with the charter draft, the CDC would need to adjust the draft accordingly.

Chances are 50:50 that the CDC will have to make that adjustment after the referendum result before submitting its draft for review by the Constitutional Court.

There are four scenarios for the August 7 referendum:

– A yes to charter draft and a yes to empowering the Senate to choose a PM.

– A yes to the draft and a no to the additional question.

– No to the draft and a yes for the additional question.

– No to the draft and no to an empowered Senate.

The third scenario of no to the draft and yes to the Senate’s additional power could lead to the most complications. In this scenario the junta would need to draft a new charter stipulating a Senate empowered in accordance with the referendum result. That would mean postponing the date of the general election, currently set for September 2017 at the soonest.

The second scenario of yes to the draft and no to extra Senate power would be the least complicated, as the election could go ahead immediately without any need to change the draft. But the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) certainly wouldn’t be happy at failing to get what it wants, which is control in Parliament via the appointed Senate.

So the junta would seek a way to add the special Senate power to the draft.

The additional question has sparked furore among politicians.

On one hand, they view empowering an appointed Senate to choose the head of government as illegitimate since the appointed officials would not be representative of voters.

Politicians are opposed to a move that would dilute their power with 250 senators appointed by the NCPO.

Simply put, the 250 senators would become members of the “NCPO party” in Parliament.

Politicians from the two major parties, Pheu Thai and the Democrats, have slammed the NLA’s move to approve the additional question. They say it implies that elected members of the House of Representatives would not be necessary. Worse still, it would pave the way for an “outsider” with no affiliation with any political party to become PM.

On the positive side, the junta has now revealed all of its cards.

The question itself is the “ace”, revealing to voters the junta’s desire to retain power after the next election through the Senate.

So, voters who now know in advance that the junta does indeed want to stay can make a decision on whether to approve that desire or not.

The junta is taking a gamble by adding the question to the referendum. While the charter draft is being used as an indicator of whether voters accept the junta, the additional question provides a test of whether citizens accept the perpetuation of junta powers.

Prem praises Prayut as an ideal role model for Thais

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Prem-praises-Prayut-as-an-ideal-role-model-for-Tha-30283811.html

Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha leads his Cabinet and military chiefs to seek Thai New Year blessings from statesman and Privy Council President General Prem Tinsulanonda at his Si Sao Thewes residence in Bangkok yesterday.

Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha leads his Cabinet and military chiefs to seek Thai New Year blessings from statesman and Privy Council President General Prem Tinsulanonda at his Si Sao Thewes residence in Bangkok yesterday.

PRIVY COUNCIL President Prem Tinsulanonda yesterday praised Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha as a role model for Thai people.

Prem, a former prime minister, said Prayut was protecting the country and maintaining love, unity and happiness for the people.

“The prime minister has always performed the traditional duty of a Thai citizen. And he deserves to be an example for people in our country,” Prem said.

The prime minister led Cabinet members, Armed Forces commanders-in-chief, the national police chief and other top officials to call on Prem at his Si Sao Thewes residence on the occasion of Songkran, the traditional Thai new year. The group paid respects to Prem in a water ceremony and received his blessing.

Prayut also praised Prem, saying the chief privy councillor was a good example of someone who was loyal to the monarchy and who had devoted himself to the country. The PM added that he and his colleagues would follow in Prem’s footsteps.

//

He also wished Prem happiness and good health and asked for his blessings for the government’s mission to work for the country.

In response, Prem wished the prime minister and his government success. He also extended his good wishes to the Thai people.

Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Prawit Wongsuwan and Justice Minister Paiboon Koomchaya were absent during yesterday’s visit to Prem’s residence.

 

Additional question to stay

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Additional-question-to-stay-30283812.html

REFERENDUM

Election Commission member Somchai Srisuthiyakorn shows a sample referendum ballot prior to a meeting regarding the upcoming vote at Government House.

Election Commission member Somchai Srisuthiyakorn shows a sample referendum ballot prior to a meeting regarding the upcoming vote at Government House.

There will be no change in the additional referendum question on whether the appointed Senate should be allowed to jointly vote with elected members of Parliament to select a prime minister, Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam said on April 11.

Politicians and the Election Commission (EC) have criticised as “leading” and “too difficult to understand” the question approved by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) to be added to the referendum question on the draft charter.

The referendum is scheduled for August 7

He said the NLA would explain the meaning of the question to the public.

Wissanu’s remark came after a meeting with representatives from the EC, the Constitution Drafting Commission, the NLA, and Bureau of the Budget to discuss the organising of the referendum.

//

Wissanu said people could express their opinions about the draft and convince others to think the same as long as they did not distort information.

“The EC has to clarify ‘grey zones’ to make it clear to the people, and what people can or cannot do. The court would judge whether a case is illegal,” said Wissanu.

Regarding the charter draft, he said, the CDC was responsible for explaining key points to the public.

The budget for holding the referendum will be discussed at the Cabinet meeting on April 12, he said. The cost was estimated at Bt2.99 billion.

Meanwhile, NLA member General Somjet Boonthanom said that the content of the referendum bill was already clear. It does not obstruct public expression of opinion about the draft, Somjet said, as long as they do not try to coerce other people.

Somjet was responding to Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva’s criticism on Sunday about the bill draft being written ambiguously on what is prohibited during the referendum process.

 

PM hits out at politicians critical of charter draft

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/PM-hits-out-at-politicians-critical-of-charter-dra-30283813.html

POLITICS

Meechai

Meechai

Prayut accuses parties of ‘doing what they like’; shrugs off poll boycott scenario.

THE PRIME MINISTER reacted angrily yesterday to criticism by politicians opposing an additional question for the referendum on the draft constitution, saying it was a matter for voters.

General Prayut Chan-o-cha said that he was convinced many people agreed with what he was doing.

“It’s fine if they [politicians] disagree with the question. In fact, they have no right to decide whether to disagree or not. This is a national referendum and it’s a matter for the people,” Prayut said.

He was responding to comments from Democrat Party politicians criticising the draft constitution and the additional referendum question proposed by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA).

//

On Sunday, the Democrats said they would vote to reject the NLA’s additional question as to whether voters agreed to empower selected senators to jointly vote with elected members of Parliament to select a prime minister. Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva said the scenario would create an imbalance within the legislature.

Yesterday, Prayut was asked if he thought the Democrats’ opposition would affect the referendum results, given the party has considerable voter support.

“I think I have a lot of people who side with me. Let’s see if people in the middle will believe them or me,” he said.

Prayut said politicians seemed to be worried that they would be unable do whatever they liked under the new constitution, as they did in the past. “They try to do anything they like because they think they come from the people,” he said.

The PM was talking to reporters during a visit to Privy Council President Prem Tinsulanonda at his Si Sao Thewet residence yesterday, where he led a group of government officials and military commanders to pay respects on the occasion of the Songkran traditional new year.

Later in the day at Government House, Prayut complained that he had headaches over the past few days because he felt like he was “getting punched in the face” by politicians. He declined to give further media interviews in the afternoon.

Asked whether he had a plan if politicians boycotted the next election, Prayut said: “That’s good. It’s fine if they don’t run. They must keep their word. People who say they are not going to contest the election should do so.”

When asked if he was referring to the Pheu Thai and Democrat parties, the country’s largest political blocs, the PM responded that they could choose not to contest the election, adding that other parties would.

Both Pheu Thai and Democrat leaders have now criticised the draft constitution. Pheu Thai members are openly calling on its supporters to vote against the charter while the Democrats have not made their standpoint clear on whether to vote against the draft.

The PM said parties still would not be allowed to hold press conferences on political issues. “Why do I have to allow them a forum? Should I give them more chances to scold me?” he asked.

Colonel Piyapong Klinpan, a spokesman for the National Council for Peace and Order, said the junta would resume actions against suspicious political movements after Songkran.

Meanwhile, Meechai Ruchupan, chairman of the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC), urged the Election Commission to keep an eye on unnamed “immoral parties” attempting to distort the draft charter’s contents.

In Kamphaeng Phet yesterday, military officers seized more than 1,600 boxes of common household medicine sets that Democrat politicians in the province distributed to local residents as part of the upcoming Thai New Year.

On their cover, the boxes feature Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva’s image and the message: “With love and care, Abhisit Vejjajiva, Democrat Party leader”.

There was no explanation from the officials involved. But some observers said it could be linked to the recent seizure of hundreds of red plastic bowls featuring a message from former premier Thaksin Shinawatra that was viewed by the junta as containing a political message. Pheu Thai politicians were to distribute the bowls to party supporters.

 

‘Criminals exploiting technology to cheat the public’

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Criminals-exploiting-technology-to-cheat-the-publi-30283696.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Sihanart

Sihanart

Caretaker secretary-general of the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) Sihanart Prayoonrat, who has recently been appointed as adviser to AMLO, talks to The Nation’s Piyanuch Thamnukasetchai about the toughest part of his work, which is detecting and fighting money laundering in Thailand – a job which entails constantly working against time.

WHAT WAS THE HIGHEST PRESSURE YOU FACED DURING YOUR FOUR YEARS AS AMLO SECRETARY-GENERAL?

There is no particular case I can think of – but the pressure was to complete a massive amount of work with time constraints. For instance, in the Klongchan Credit Union Cooperative (KCUC) case, the money embezzled from the public by the cooperative executives was used to buy many plots of land. We had to work against time to prevent these assets from changing hands. We had to work fast before the media reported the scam, especially as former cooperative chairman Supachai Srisupaaksorn had not been arrested.

The kickback case against Pol General Pongpat Chayapan, former chief of the Central Investigation Bureau, involved many business transactions and was linked to many people. Many assets had to be seized and checked and put up for auction.

HOW DO OFFSHORE COMPANIES AVOID TAX AND LAUNDER MONEY?

Offshore companies are set up to transfer profits made domestically to foreign countries in order to pay less tax or to avoid double taxation – without having to open actual business operations in the country of the offshore companies being registered.

The process is to export goods to countries of buyers – but to mark down the price on the invoice to less than the selling price. For instance, the selling price is Bt200 but the invoice price is Bt130. This is to pay less tax. The goods would be shipped to the country of the buyer – but payment is made in the country where the company has an account without having to transfer money to the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands or Bermuda. Since the money is not transferred to Thailand, the Revenue Department cannot collect tax. This is a legally correct way that is done across the world. It is not money laundering but AMLO has to watch out because there could be politicians or government officials using this method to launder money. The Revenue Department’s methods of checking are different from AMLO’s.

This method, however, is not used by law-abiding countries such as the United States. The US Federal Reserve has regulations that all banks in the world must submit reports to it if a US citizen opens a bank account with US$50,000 upwards. The US central bank will deduct 30 per cent from the total deposit without having to prove anything. The Revenue Department has a measure of collecting 15 per cent in tax from deposits transferred out of the country.

HOW DOES THE EXISTING LAW PREVENT POLITICAL INTERFERENCE IN AMLO – AS POLITICIANS CAN USE THE OFFICE AS A TOOL TO SABOTAGE POLITICAL RIVALS?

Previous and current governments have passed laws on AMLO by transferring the agency – which was under the jurisdiction of the Justice Ministry – to be under the PM, who cannot interfere in AMLO’s operations. Many state agencies seek support from AMLO to analyse financial transactions of any suspected cases of corruption and irregularities and they can seize assets of corrupt officials very fast.

ARE CURRENT MONEY LAUNDERING LAWS EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING CRIMES?

The latest amendment to the money laundering law extended the law to cover 24 offences. The international standard is for each country to have anti-money laundering actions against 20 offences.

HOW DO YOU FORESEE CRIMINALS DEVELOPING NEW MONEY LAUNDERING ACTIVITIES?

Previously, drug traders opened – for instance – gold shops, car for rent businesses to front their illegal businesses. But [now] as they can trade their goods online, they don’t need front businesses. In some regions, criminals still operate legal and illegal businesses together. AMLO has set up a division to monitor illegal technology activities and found a lot of offences that led to seizure of assets. Criminals have exploited technology to cheat the public by luring them to buy goods and services.

AMLO has taken the right path by adopting standard practices. If we can block financial transactions, we can block criminal activities. Countries that have anti-money laundering agencies that do not meet FATF standards would be boycotted from trading and financial transactions.

When countries have good standards on financial checks, investors are confident they can invest without being cheated, thus, it is good for the country’s economy. If there is liberation of financial transaction through an online system, concerned agencies must adopt anti-money laundering standards to prevent criminals from exploiting financial liberalisation.

‘Penguin’ urges students to push for democratic society

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Penguin-urges-students-to-push-for-democratic-soci-30283698.html

SPECIAL REPORT

Parit “Penguin” Chiwarak holds a piece of paper with the message “Bring our free high-school back”.

Parit “Penguin” Chiwarak holds a piece of paper with the message “Bring our free high-school back”.

HIS INTEREST in politics began when he was just a 10-year-old boy, after Parit Chiwarak read the story of the French Revolution that began in 1789.

“Liberty, equality, fraternity. French Revolution slogan resonated in my brain and encouraged me to learn more about our political history,” said “Penguin”, as Parit is known by family and friends.

The 17-year-old student from Triam Udom Suksa School recently made headlines in the Thai media when he and his friends challenged members of the Constitution Drafting Commission regarding policies providing free education as spelled out in the charter draft. “The draft is depriving students of basic educational rights,” Parit said, referring to Article 54 in the draft that seeks to begin pupils’ 12-year period of free education starting at kindergarten instead of at Prathom 1 in primary school as at present. Previously, students had free education until Mathayom 6, but the charter draft allows free education only until Mathayom 3.

“We have gone beyond that point [providing free secondary-school education] for decades. Why do we have to jump back to discuss the same issue? We should move forward, talking about reform not basic rights,” Parit said. Last year, Parit also challenged Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha during a seminar by appealing to the premier to revoke the so-called “civic duty” school curriculum designed by the junta.

The student was criticised for his action and accused of being backed by an anonymous political force – but the young activist views that allegation as an “old-fashioned, but effective joke”. He said he would not risk his future just for money, and he was instead motivated by his ideology.

However, each time that he challenges authorities, he apologises to show humility to adults in keeping with Thai traditions.

“I did not mean to be arrogant. I just wanted to share my opinion with the leaders. But there is no way – no discussion was held to listen to students’ opinions. What should I do to make sure that my voice has been heard?” Parit asked.

Given his high profile, the student has both advocates and detractors.

Some of his school friends have suggested that he keep a low profile and concentrate on his studies, but Parit said he is not worried about negative feedback.

He added that as long as he knew “what and for what” motivated his actions, and they were for the country’s sake, he would carry on.

After the coup, his parents have been concerned about their son’s safety because many high-profile activists have been detained under the junta’s “attitude adjustment” programme, but they allowed him to decide on his own. His father, he said, only gave him suggestions regarding positive and negative consequences of his actions.

“In society, we have to fight for what we want no matter what happens. I wish all Thai students have basic rights to a good education. So I have to move on,” Parit said, adding that his role model was Chit Phumisak, the Thai author, historian and poet. Chit was shot dead in 1966 by authorities of the anti-communist government as he was considered a threat to the state. Parit said the slain activist inspired him to also be a historian in the future.

As the secretary-general of a student group called “Education for Independence”, Parit urges students not to wait passively for adults to make decisions that might harm them in the long run. Founded in 2014 after the coup, the group aims to demonstrate student power, assembling about 100 secondary school students nationwide who have shared interests in education and democracy.

Parit added that students have the power to stand up for what they want if they are brave enough even though society often ignores children’s voices. In his view, students are exhausted by hectic study schedules that make them worn out to think about social contributions and reforms.

He also pledged to fight for “dream education and a democratic society” even though Thailand is now ruled by a military-installed government.

It takes time to gain real democracy. France, he said, required a couple of hundred years after its revolution to gain a real democracy, while it has only been 84 years since Thailand’s own 1932 revolution.

“Thailand has a long way to go before real democracy comes,” he said, adding that people in society should be enthusiastic to exercise their rights to call for democracy.

“If only one penguin turns out, the public will see it as strange. But if tens of thousands of penguins emerge, it becomes normal,” Parit said.

NACC awaits info from AMLO on ex-politicians

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/NACC-awaits-info-from-AMLO-on-ex-politicians-30283700.html

PANAMA PAPERS

Photo from http://qz.com/

Photo from http://qz.com/

THE NATIONAL Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) is working closely with anti-money laundering authorities on suspected cases of former politicians using the services of Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca to hide their assets while holding public office.

NACC president Pol General Watcharapol Prasarnrajkit said the agency is awaiting accurate information from the Anti-Money Laundering Organisation (AMLO) after it was confirmed that 16 Thai businessmen and former politicians were on the list of the so-called Panama Papers leaked to international media recently.

Watcharapol said he had ordered the NACC secretary-general, Sansern Pholjiak to verify the list so that the NACC could examine if the unnamed former politicians had violated the NACC’s asset declaration regulations while taking public office. In addition, the NACC will have to verify if there were assets such as bank deposits hidden overseas as alleged, he said.

When the agency gets more information from AMLO, it will pursue the cases and cross-check with asset statements filed by these former politicians to see if there were any wrongdoings. If these persons did not declare their wealth properly and hid their assets in offshore companies, they could face legal action from the NACC.

Watcharaphol said the list of names provided by AMLO is not yet official, as authorities are awaiting more accurate information on this matter. Several hundreds of Thai individuals, expatriates living in Thailand and juristic persons are on the list of clients reportedly using the services of Mossack Fonseca to hide assets overseas.

Abhisit slams charter as a step backward

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Abhisit-slams-charter-as-a-step-backward-30283714.html

NEW CHARTER

Abhisit

Abhisit

Democrats will vote to reject referendum question on empowering senate to choose the prime minister.

Abhisit slams charter as a step backward

DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE TO REJECT REFERENDUM QUESTION ON EMPOWERING SENATE TO CHOOSE THE PRIME MINISTER

WASAMON AUDJARINT,

NATTHAPAT PROMKAEW

//

THE NATION

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY yesterday called the draft constitution “a democracy in retreat”, but remained silent on how it will vote in the August 7 charter referendum.

“The draft distorts [democratic] will and weakens people’s power compared with state authority,” party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva said.

The party opposes the draft, as it undermines the democratic approach, he told a press conference, along with his deputies Ongart Klampaiboon and Jurin Laksanawisit.

“People’s rights have been progressive [in previous charters], but those in the new draft go backward from the [most recent] 2007 one,” he said.

The Democrats have yet to say whether they will accept the draft charter in the referendum, but will clarify their stance if there is “a time to decide” possibly before the referendum date.

The party’s reasoning is quite similar to that of Pheu Thai Party, which last month issued a statement rejecting the charter draft for violating democratic principles and being a product of the coup-installed government.

Pheu Thai has also called on people to vote against the draft in the referendum.

Abhisit criticised the draft for depriving people of their right to participate in the political arena.

For instance, people will not be able to elect the Upper House, which could be empowered along with the Lower House to jointly choose the prime minister if a premier from the parties’ three-candidate lists cannot be selected.

The condition is stated in the draft’s provisional clause, which also stipulates that voters will have only one ballot, preventing them from choosing constituency and party-list MPs from different parties.

The charter will also be too difficult to amend, the Democrat chief said, requiring approval from one-third of the handpicked Senate, which gives it a virtual veto.

With the Senate’s term to coincide with the five-year transitional period, handpicked senators could be involved with more than one government.

There also could be attempts to prolong the provisional period, as was seen with the post-coup charter of 1978.

The Democrat Party is clear that it will vote to reject the additional referendum question proposed by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) on a role for the selected senators in choosing the PM during the transitional period, which would give them the same authority as MPs.

That scenario would create an imbalance within the legislature, Abhisit argued.

Despite being promoted to tackle graft, the charter has loopholes in its anti-corruption mechanisms, Abhisit said, giving the example that the lifting of impeachment powers would mean that wrongdoers would be tried in the courts, which could adversely affect prosecutions.

Allegations of law-breaking by National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) members would be considered by the parliamentary president instead of being turned over to the courts. The Democrat leader said the NACC could negotiate with the government to stall such inquiries.

The charter also reduces the punishment for state officials found guilty of wrongdoing, from a lifetime ban from politics to only five years.

Abhisit said the Election Commission (EC) should state clearly in its recently passed referendum bill what is prohibited during the elections process to reassure the people’s rights to participate, which should be carried out freely and fairly.

The ruling junta should also answer clearly what would happen if the charter is rejected in the referendum, Abhisit said.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha slammed politicians criticising the charter draft and the NLA’s additional question, and asked how such question could worsen the country.

“Politicians dare to criticise the NCPO and [our] reform efforts because if we succeed, people will never turn to them again,” he said.

Prayut also rhetorically questioned whether those politicians had ever succeeded in solving national problems without negative consequences. For instance, he said, they merely provide a budget to solve the problems year after year, instead of finding ways for sustainable fund-raising.

Former Pheu Thai MP Somkid Chueakong said the NLA’s referendum question indicated that the junta wanted to cling to power, and the NLA was under the military government’s thumb.

The EC should be open and not obstruct people from expressing their opinion, he added.

Suriyasai Katasila, deputy dean of Rangsit University’s College of Social Innovation, also urged the junta to clearly tell the public what would happen if the charter is rejected, so voters will know what is going to happen and which charter will be promulgated as an alternative.

“The question has been added to the referendum, but no answer [about what will happen if the charter is rejected]. This referendum will endlessly bring about problems,” he said.

A Suan Dusit poll released on Saturday said most respondents agreed with adding the NLA’s question to the referendum, saying that senators are senior figures with special expertise.