High-speed rail plan should be shelved for now

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/High-speed-rail-plan-should-be-shelved-for-now-30282826.html

BURNING ISSUE

THE LATEST flip-flop concerning the Thai-Chinese railway project has raised new questions which need to be answered before the government switches on the green light to invest Bt170 billion to Bt190 billion on the 352km Bangkok-Nakhon Ratchasima route.

First, is this project – estimated by Thai authorities to cost Bt170 billion and by Chinese authorities Bt190 billion – redundant with the State Railway of Thailand’s ongoing project to build the double-track railroad? Or is it workable since both are on the same route?

Previously, the Thai-Chinese project was supposed to be more than 800km long, running from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima and then to Nong Khai province near the border with Laos. It would have linked up with Laos’ standard-gauge track, which would then have connected with China’s railway system.

Thailand proposed to China to form a joint venture for this Bt500-billion-plus scheme. China then requested the right to develop properties along the route and train stations plus other conditions, which were not acceptable to Thailand.

After last week’s meeting with China’s Premier Li Keqiang in Hainan, Thai Prime Minister PrayutChan-o-cha announced Thailand would invest solely in the project’s first-phase – from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima – while suspending other sections of the project.

The 352km first-phase route would use the 1.435-metre standard-gauge track while the trains would travel at speeds of 250 km per hour and mainly serve passengers. At this stage, the Thai government will be the sole investor and will consider inviting private investors to operate the service under a contract.

The Thai Finance Ministry will be responsible for providing the sources of funds, while an environmental impact assessment is underway.

On connectivity with Laos and China, Thai authorities said passengers and cargo could use the one-metre gauge double railroads from Nakhon Ratchasima to Nong Khai – and then switch to the 1.435-metre standard gauge track in Laos and China.

Under this plan, construction of the first-phase Bangkok-Nakhon Ratchasima route could start in August or September of this year.

Another issue is whether Thailand should call international bidding for this project since the Thai government will wholly invest in the scheme.

Previously, Thailand had signed a Framework of Cooperation with China on December 3, 2015 to develop the project. It would be a diplomatic fiasco if China’s high-speed train technology was not used and there was international bidding.

After all, Thailand is already working on a multi-billion-baht double-track railroad expansion on the Bankok-Nakhon Ratchasima and other related routes.

Double-track trains will travel at a higher speed of 100-120 km/h, much faster than today’s low speed on single tracks.

Economically, high-speed trains travelling at 250 km/h are going to be expensive as only 20,000 passengers are expected to use them per day on the Bangkok-Nakhon Ratchasima route when it is operational.

Such a high-speed service is not economically feasible for cargo transport either, so the service would face significant losses for years to come.

In addition, it will not generate significant property and other development along the route since the planned high-speed trains are going to be on the existing route from Bangkok to the northeastern province.

In terms of connectivity with neighbouring countries, the system will not work due to the different size of rail tracks, so it’s better for Thailand to focus on implementing the double-track railroads at this stage.

Any high-speed train project should be implemented at a later date.

US calls again for return to democracy

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/US-calls-again-for-return-to-democracy-30282749.html

THAI-US RELATIONS

Sarah Sewall, the US State Department’s under-secretary for civilian security, democracy and human rights, watches as Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha shows her a diagram of the junta’s political road map during a meeting at Government House yesterday.

Sarah Sewall, the US State Department’s under-secretary for civilian security, democracy and human rights, watches as Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha shows her a diagram of the junta’s political road map during a meeting at Government House yesterday.

State department official discusses rights with Prayut.

THE UNITED STATES yesterday urged Thailand to restore democratic governance while stressing the importance of ensuring full respect is given to freedom of expression and other human rights such as fundamental liberties.

The principles are essential to securing stable and sustainable governance and institutions, said Sarah Sewall, the US under secretary for civilian security, democracy and human rights.

Sewall also highlighted the value of an inclusive peace process to finding a lasting solution to the conflict in the deep South during her visit to Songkhla province yesterday, according to a US Embassy statement.

Sewall arrived in Thailand on Friday.

//

She met with Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha yesterday to discuss issues of concern including human trafficking.

During that meeting, she praised the country for successfully combating human trafficking – a task which the United States and Thailand cooperate on.

Sewall based her assessment on what she observed at Songkhla’s Provincial Police Region 9 and the port in-port out control centre in Samut Sakhon province on Sunday, said deputy government spokesman Maj-General Werachon Sukondhapatipak.

Sewall was impressed by the hard work being performed by the two agencies to combat the issue sustainably, he said.

She also highlighted the Kingdom’s cooperation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees on regional irregular migration, he said, to which Prayut replied that his government had worked on the issue closely with the US and neighbouring countries.

The US Embassy said Sewall called on Thailand to continue providing protection to refugees, asylum seekers and other vulnerable people seeking a safe haven.

Werachon said Prayut reiterated that the government was following its roadmap to democracy, with a general election to be held next year.

The prime minister also told Sewall the government was working on anti-corruption campaigns, he said.

To counter concerns from human rights watchdogs, Prayut insisted that the government placed importance on protecting people’s rights and freedoms.

Prayut and Sewall also exchanged views on human rights protection, illegal fisheries, the Kingdom’s political stability and the new charter, Werachon said.

After the meeting, Sewall spoke at the US-Thai International Law Enforcement Academy, where she stressed the importance of regional cooperation in fighting crime, promoting respect for human rights and ensuring equal legal protection for everyone.

The US Embassy said the aim of Sewall’s trip was to engage senior government officials and representatives of civil society based on the 183-year-old partnership between the two countries.

 

Meechai asks why CDC can’t explain charter draft to voters

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Meechai-asks-why-CDC-cant-explain-charter-draft-to-30282750.html

Meechai

Meechai

CONSTITUTION Drafting Commission (CDC) chairman Meechai Ruchupan questioned yesterday why the CDC was not allowed to help explain the referendum draft bill to the public.

His query was directed at the National Legislative Assembly (NLA)’s legal standing committee, which is considering a draft bill on the public referendum on the proposed charter.

“I found that the bill concerning the planned referendum had no clauses giving authority to the CDC to explain the constitution to the people. If it is not us, then who would do it?” an apparently irritated Meechai said.

Under the draft bill, members of the Election Commission would have this responsibility. But Meechai questioned that body’s capability, saying EC members were not charter drafters. It must stay neutral and be mindful not to become too suggestive in terms of how people vote.

“The EC [responsible for holding the referendum] cannot say if this is a good or a bad charter. So, we drafters are perplexed by the NLA’s move,” Meechai said.

“If it was really [bad] it would affect the referendum and we might have to propose a new referendum bill.”

Meechai added that the CDC had already told the government about such irregularities.

Asked what if the NLA was not impressed with the CDC’s charter draft, the head drafter said that the legislators would have to write the charter themselves.

Taweesak Sukawatin, a member of the NLA committee, said his panel had already resolved not to revise the bill but authorised the CDC to explain the charter to voters.

He said the 2014 interim charter only gave the CDC authority to notify Cabinet and the NLA after the draft was completed and then it would be up to the EC to publicise the draft content.

“Considering the interim charter, we can see that it would become an issue of conflict if we had the CDC authorised to publicise the charter draft,” he explained.

In addition, the draft bill paved the way for others to join in the public discussion on the charter draft, including the CDC via the EC, he said.

As of yesterday, draft charters had almost completed the draft and today they will symbolically submit it to the Cabinet. Technically, the CDC has until Thursday to find and iron out any mistakes, technical or linguistic, anywhere in the draft.

The CDC and the NLA and the National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA) will meet tomorrow. The constitution writers will summarise and explain key points in the draft to their colleagues.

The NLA and the NRSA are not authorised to vote for or against the charter.

NLA vice president Surachai Liengboonlertchai said the NSRA had until this Friday to propose any additional question in the referendum on the charter. After that, on April 7, the NLA would discuss whether any new question was needed – and if so, what it would be.

He assured that the legislators take cues from nobody and any decision about an extra referendum question would be made independently.

New charter ballot could be a historic game-changer

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/New-charter-ballot-could-be-a-historic-game-change-30282752.html

BURNING ISSUE

THE PLANNED referendum in August – on the question whether people approve of the latest draft constitution for the Kingdom – may well test the spirit of democracy in Thai society.

The result could not only yield the adoption of the controversial charter but also give justification to the junta that is backing the draft.

The new constitution draft is now complete and ready for public release before it is submitted to a referendum in early August.

Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) chairman Meechai Ruchupan recently said the draft – with its 17 chapters and 279 sections – could serve to both manage crises and curb corruption. He said it follows the blueprint drawn up by the ruling National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) – seen in Article 35 of the 2014 interim charter – and the recent controversial proposals from the so-called “four rivers of power” including the Cabinet.

The new proposed political structure now covers the single-ballot system; the qualifications of electoral candidates (and the grounds for their disqualification); the parliamentary structure, including 250 non-elected senators during the transitional period; and the powers of the independent organisations and the Constitutional Court. Other rules are included to make sure the majority government, elected by voters from across the country, is held in check. The “balances”, however, are still highly in question.

As much as the CDC assured its independence, the ruling coup-makers stood their ground while denying they sought to retain power after the promised general election. However, it should be noted that the political structure delivered by this charter draft would not be unusual compared to other post-coup periods.

The 1978 Constitution, sponsored by the coup-makers led by Admiral Sa-ngad Chaloryu, provided a similar parliamentary composition with a fully appointed Senate as powerful as the elected MPs. The consequences, however, were not very rosy and the bloodshed in 1992 was in part a legacy of that political structure, which led to coup-maker General Suchinda Kraprayoon to become prime minister in the semi-democratic era following the 1978 charter.

The tragedy of 1992, in blood and lives, proved the society’s intolerance of an undemocratic outsider prime minister.

Today, more than two decades later, Thais are being tested again, this time by the current regime and its proposed canon – and whether the document has enough of the spirit of democracy, if any at all.

Thus, this upcoming referendum – asking whether the junta-sponsored charter should be accepted and adopted as the country’s supreme law – is decisive and promises to be another significant milestone in Thai history.

If it passes the plebiscite, a similar post-coup political structure would re-emerge – which could lead to discontent and upheaval as in 1992. At the same time, the coup and the junta’s seizure of power would also be automatically endorsed.

To elaborate: Success in the referendum could mean that society thinks coup d’etats are acceptable and approves of a constitution in which the people played no part in the drafting. More importantly, it could mean that the military is authorised to seize power and tear up a constitution, as long as it can convince people it could write a new and better one.

On the contrary, if the charter is killed in the referendum, it will be a slap to the face of the current regime. Doubts would be raised if it were only the charter draft that people turned down – or were the charter’s sponsors who are currently ruling the country rendering a questionable performance?

Defeat would mean that voters had turned sour on the charter. The whole regime backing the draft would feel the effects.

Either way, the outcome of the plebiscite will reveal which side of the political spectrum the majority of society is leaning towards. And perhaps it will be a wake-up call to the key leaders of the losing side who will have to sit down and rethink their battle strategy once again.

EC-registered charter debates ‘allowed’

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/EC-registered-charter-debates-allowed-30282753.html

Election Commission member Prawit Rattanapian has said providing platforms to debate the charter draft is not allowed unless the debaters register with the EC.

He said opponents and supporters of the charter draft such as Jatuporn Prompan and Suriyasai Katasila could dispatch representatives to record debates and the EC would disseminate the recordings through the media.

He said if the people organised their own debates to discuss the charter it may be deemed in violation of the law.

He said the EC did not need to ask the National Council for Peace and Order to cancel the ban on political rally to allow EC-registered debates to take place because the process was just an expression of opinion and not a rally.

Prawit said the EC would seek the support of 47 branches of the Rajamangala University of Technology and Rajabhat University to help disseminate the content of the charter draft ahead of the public referendum.

He said once the Constitution Drafting Commission submitted the charter draft summery to the EC, the agency would take one month to distribute it ahead of the referendum.

Disobedient politicians may face re-education

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Disobedient-politicians-may-face-re-education-30282761.html

POLITICS

Wattana

Wattana

Critics who fail to adjust their attitude to be held in custody longer, Prawit says.

THE JUNTA is toughening its stance against politicians who are critical of the post-coup government and refuse to cooperate.

Government figures warned yesterday that people who “have failed to behave” after being repeatedly summoned for “attitude adjustment” will have to undergo an intensive “training course”.

The latest move by the generals came under fire as critics likened the plan to “re-education” camps in communist countries and described it as violation of human rights.

Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Prawit Wongsuwan said yesterday that a “training course” would be necessary after politicians failed to get the point after many sessions to adjust their attitude.

//

“We will hold a training course for them that may last three to seven days. The National Council for Peace and Order [NCPO] will be the organiser,” Prawit told reporters at the Defence Ministry.

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha added yesterday that the NCPO’s attitude-adjustment sessions would now be held in the form of training courses “for better understanding”.

“They will be asked about their behaviour in the past, whether it was right or wrong,” Prayut said. “They will be asked what they would do if they were in government and if they understand what this government is doing. If they don’t know, they should no longer be politicians.”

The junta’s warning comes as the final constitutional draft is set to be submitted to the Cabinet and a national referendum on the draft charter is just months away.

Critics yesterday reacted strongly against the plan to hold training courses for “repeat offender” politicians who refused to toe the junta’s line.

Chaturon Chaisang, a key Pheu Thai Party figure, said the junta’s initiative was “unbelievable”, adding that it reminded him of methods used by communist countries to gag their dissidents.

“This reminds me of how communist countries dealt with dissidents in the past,” he said.

Human rights lawyer Yaowalak Anupan said that the NCPO move seemed to be intended to force people how to think. That constituted an infringement on human rights, she said.

“Basically, people can think differently and the junta should not force them to think in the way they want them to. The NCPO is frightening people,” Yaowalak said.

The NCPO has to adjust itself and be more flexible, otherwise the public will begin to view it as ineffective, she said.

Leading anti-coup activist Sombat Boonngam-anong asked yesterday to see the training course’s curriculum and suggested that the junta modify attitude-adjustment sessions to be held as seminars at a resort rather than at a military camp.

The activist, also known as Bor Kor Lai Jud, or the “Polka Dot Editor”, said those detained for attitude adjustment would join the camp if the curriculum involved discussion and debate instead of detention.

Prawit said yesterday that this was not the right time for politicians to take action. “I would like to ask for time. The next election is not long after this.”

“The new constitution is almost finished now and the referendum will take place a short while afterwards,” he said.

Commenting on the detention of Pheu Thai’s Wattana Muangsuk and Worachai Hema, Prawit said their detention was not in violation of human rights.

Asked how many days the two politicians would be held, Prawit said he did not know as the NCPO was dealing with the matter.

Meanwhile, Army commander General Teerachai Nakwanich said authorities would ensure that no moves are taken to create confusion in the run-up to the referendum.

 

Ombudsmen – ‘a mirror on the work of governments’

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Ombudsmen–a-mirror-on-the-work-of-governments-30282649.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Gunther Krauter

Gunther Krauter

The International Ombudsman Institute (IOI) is the only cooperative organisation representing independent ombudsmen around the world.

It will hold its 11th World Conference in Bangkok this November.

Secretary General Gunther Krauter, who is also the Austrian ombudsman, talked to The Nation’s political desk about the event and the role of ombudsman institutions.

CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE IOI IN A FEW WORDS?

The IOI is the only global non-political organisation of parliamentary Ombuds-institutions. It was established in 1978 in Canada and since 2009 has its headquarters in Vienna. I have the honour of being the secretary general. Today, we have 175 members in more than 90 countries, six regions. The main duties of the IOI are to provide training for ombudsman staff, do research and offer regional subsidies.

WHAT ARE THE CORE RESPONSIBILITIES OF OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS?

The core responsibilities are handling individual complaints of citizens against public administration, initiating ex-officio investigations, protecting and promoting human rights. Some Ombuds-institutions even have an anti-corruption mandate. If ombudsmen find cases of mal-administration, they have the power to make recommendations to authorities. They, therefore, can be seen as a permanent mirror for governments, administration officials and members of parliaments.

IN NOVEMBER THE 11TH IOI WORLD CONFERENCE WILL TAKE PLACE IN BANGKOK. WHAT IS THE PROCE?DURE TO CHOOSE A VENUE FOR SUCH A BIG EVENT?

Every four years, the IOI invites its members to attend a world-conference. In 2013, we conducted a tender to find a suitable and capable candidate. Applicant institutions from Asia, Africa and Europe presented their offers to the IOI board meeting in Vienna, The board mem?bers then voted in a secret ballot and elected the Ombudsman of Thailand to host the World Conference 2016. This will be the first time for the conference to be held in Asia.

WHAT ARE THE MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE WORLD CONFERENCE?

I think there are two overriding goals. First, organisational course settings, such as the glob?al IOI electoral reform that foresees a more democratic voting procedure for officials of the IOI, introducing universal suffrage. Second, we concentrate on the “Evolution of Ombudsmanship” and discuss themes like a stronger human rights approach in the daily work of ombudsmen or the support of ombudsman-institutions under threat.

YOU MENTIONED OMBUDSMEN UNDER THREAT. WHAT KIND OF THREAT DO YOU MEAN, IN PARTICULAR?

Unfortunately, in some regions Ombudsman institutions are under pressure such as through financial cuts, or the loss of competence due to amendments of laws or privatisation, leaving citizens without protection. In special cases, authorities or even parliaments do not table the reports for discussion or institutions can be undermined in many ways. Therefore, the IOI is preparing the endorsement of a “Bangkok Declaration” to strengthen the concept of the independent ombudsman to protect and promote good governance and human rights.

WHAT IS THE “BANGKOK DECLARATION” EXPECTED TO CONTAIN?

First of all, the declaration will be a clear statement for democracy and the rule of law in all countries. It will also entail a perspective for a stronger human rights focus in the future, espe?cially by a close cooperation with citizens and civil society. Finally, the strengthening of our member institutions through a clear and straightforward procedure, if they are under threat.

WHAT DO YOU AS SECRETARY GENERAL PERSONALLY EXPECT FROM THE WORLD CONFERENCE?

I am convinced that the Ombudsman of Thailand will be a very professional and enthusiastic host. We can expect exciting discussions and far-reaching decisions. Hopefully, with the presence of so many independent ombudsmen, we will also contribute to democratic development in Thailand.

THE AUSTRIAN OMBUDSMAN OR THE “VOLKSANWALTSCHAFT” IS A BIG DEAL IN AUSTRIA. WHY IS IT SO POWERFUL AS AN INDEPENDENT INSTITU?TION?

The Austrian Ombudsman Board has existed for nearly 40 years and one of its most powerful tools is that ombudsmen are actually addressing the ministers directly and they take the cases very seriously.

Even though ministers are not legally accountable to the ombudsman and ombudsmen cannot impeach the ministers, we as ombudsmen are the representatives of the parliament. And the parliament could impeach the ministers. Thus, ministers take the ombudsman very seriously. That is the most powerful tool.

WHAT SHOULD THAI OMBUDSMEN LEARN FROM THE VOLKSANWALTSCHAFT?

In Austria, we ombudsmen have a television show, which is very popular. It addresses the problems people have with mal-administration and bring the parties in conflict – the citizens who are not satisfied with the administration’s work and the representatives from the administration side – to talk and the ombudsmen act as mediators to help resolve the issue.

I think Thailand should have a similar TV programme because it gives the ombudsman a lot of preventive power and has proven very effective in Austria.

Release ex-MP, says Pheu Thai

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Release-ex-MP-says-Pheu-Thai-30282650.html

Worachai

Worachai

PHEU THAI PARTY yesterday called for the quick release of former MP Worachai Hema, who was summoned by military officers on Saturday evening, following his comments that were allegedly critical of the junta leader.

On Thursday, Worachai called for Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, the leader of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), to take responsibility by resigning from the premier’s post if the charter draft is voted down in the upcoming referendum.

During his weekly talk show on Friday, Prayut said people telling him to resign “should be careful” and could be prosecuted under the law.

NCPO spokesman Colonel Winthai Suvaree said the ex-MP’s comments were “uncreative” and “sarcastic” and could lead to a public misunderstanding. They were also controversial regarding the junta’s peacekeeping efforts, Winthai said.

However, a Pheu Thai statement replied that Worachai’s comments were in line with a democratic approach and had not caused any public disturbance.

The military’s forced detention also violated principles of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the party said, adding the action would affect the image of the junta government and of the country.

Worachai should be tried under a legitimate legal process if he is found to have committed a crime, the party said, adding that the government and the NCPO should explain how Worachai’s actions had broken the law.

The party statement also asked the junta to respect people’s freedom of expression after the military had summoned more than 1,500 citizens for “attitude adjustment”.

NCPO to revamp its TV show

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/NCPO-to-revamp-its-TV-show-30282652.html

POLITICS

THE NATIONAL Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) plans to revamp its daily 30-minute TV programme “Thailand Moves Forward” to boost critically low ratings, a source said yesterday.

The NCPO on Friday met with representatives from ministries, public relations departments, the premier’s secretariat, and TV stations including Channels 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 to solve the ratings problem, the NCPO source said.

The NCPO worried the ratings could result in the public not understanding the junta’s work.

The meeting resolved that the programme should contain more special reports produced during field trips to attract a larger audience. The reports will include interviews with people such as directors-general, local law-enforcement officials and village heads as well as with ordinary citizens, the source said. The new programme will focus on presenting policies and following the government’s activities and outcomes in areas in which people are interested, the source said.

The meeting, however, did not consider revamping Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha’s weekly talk show “Returning Happiness to People”, the source added.

CDC draft revisions ‘may be a weakness’ ahead of referendum

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/CDC-draft-revisions-may-be-a-weakness-ahead-of-ref-30282653.html

POLITICAL GROUPS may campaign against the charter draft by saying that it allows the junta to hold on to power because provisions regarding political structures during the transitional period have greatly captured the public’s attention, a leading academic has claimed.

Suriyasai Katasila, deputy dean of Rangsit University’s College of Social Innovation, said this “may become the weakness of the charter draft that overshadows the positive points of the draft”. “The Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) must quickly disseminate the strengths of the draft in addressing political and reform issues,” he said.

The CDC will make final revisions to the charter draft today before forwarding it for Cabinet approval, CDC spokesman Amorn Wanitwiwat said.

The CDC has revised 279 articles of the charter draft by taking into account suggestions from all sectors.

The CDC will review the final wording before delivering the final revised version to the Cabinet tomorrow.

The drafting of the charter will be completed within the 180-day period required by the interim charter of 2014, and CDC chairman Meechai Ruchupan will hold a press conference to talk about the draft’s implications.

The CDC will explain the draft to the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), the National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA) and other state bodies on Wednesday.

Amorn said the CDC had taken on board some suggestions from the four major government bodies that it believed were reasonable and did not bow to pressure to change the draft. All the suggestions were presented to the commission.

NRSA deputy chairman Alongkorn Ponlaboot lauded the CDC for sticking to the roadmap for a return to democracy and the commitment to hold a general election next year. The CDC also included the reform roadmap in the charter draft as suggested by the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), the NLA and the NRSA.

“It is unprecedented that the charter would have such a reform roadmap,” Alongkorn said.

He said the NRSA would question the CDC tomorrow about the election system, the new checks and balances for Parliament, and the local and central administrations, including the drafting of related organic laws.

Former charter writer Kanin Bunsuwan called on the junta to reveal what its next move would be if the charter draft does not pass the public referendum.

“We want to know if the public rejects the draft, will the junta appoint a new charter writing team or bring a previous charter into use? Keeping mum on this point is not good for the country as we are facing uncertainty again,” he said.

Former foreign minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul criticised the NCPO and the government for rejecting proposals from all groups that were designed to make a democratic charter.

“Our calls have fallen on deaf ears. They [the junta] only want the charter to be written the way they wanted from the beginning. I feel sorry for Thai people,” he said.