InternationalDec 03. 2020The Pfizer logo at a Pfizer facility in Puurs, Belgium, on Nov. 10, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Geert Vanden Wijngaert..
By The Washington Post · William Booth, Karla Adam
LONDON – Britain became the first country to grant emergency approval on Wednesday to the coronavirus vaccine developed by the Pfizer and BioNTech, smashing all speed records to see a potentially lifesaving shot invented, tested and approved in less than a year.
British officials said a mass immunization program would begin almost immediately, with distribution of the first 800,000 doses to begin next week in a remarkable rollout of an entirely new kind of vaccine, built with a few bits of RNA, that must be stored and shipped at Antarctic temperatures.
Drug regulators in Britain have a global reputation for being tough but quick-moving, but Wednesday’s decision is likely to intensify the focus on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has faced increasing pressure from the Trump administration to approve Pfizer’s vaccine. On Tuesday, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows summoned Stephen Hahn, the head of the FDA, to ask why the agency was not moving faster.
The British government said the first people to receive the vaccine would be the most vulnerable to covid-19, and so at the head of the line will be the residents of nursing homes and their caregivers. In Britain, like the United States, residents of these homes suffered high rates of mortality, especially in the first wave of the pandemic. According to the Office for National Statistics, over 17,000 people – 27 percent of coronavirus-related deaths in England and Wales – have died in nursing homes.
The care home residents will be followed by all those over 80 and front-line medical workers. Then the over 75, the over 70s and individuals who are “clinically extremely vulnerable.”
At a Downing Street news conference, June Raine, chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, said that the regulator had “absolute confidence” in the “safety, effectiveness and quality” of the vaccine.
“No stone has been left unturned,” she said.
“If you are climbing a mountain, you prepare and prepare. We started that in June. By the time the interim results became available on November 10 we were at base camp and then when we got the final analysis we were ready for that last sprint that takes us to today.”
Wei Shen Lim, chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, said Britain was prioritizing those most at risk of dying from the virus, those who are most vulnerable, and health-care workers. He said that the order of who gets a jab first is unrelated to lockdown tiers where people live.
Munir Pirmohamed, a professor at the University of Liverpool and an independent adviser to the government, said the Pfizer data showed that there was partial immunity after the first dose and that people will be immune seven days after the second dose. The two doses are given about three weeks apart.
British officials say they will have 800,000 doses of the vaccine in the country within days, with another few million doses by the end of the year. Pfizer has said it can supply 40 million doses here in the spring.
But Britain has said it wants to immunize the whole country of 67 million – so supply will crucial.
British regulators are also reviewing for approval of a competing vaccine made by Oxford University and the British-Swedish pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca. If approved the government has made orders for 100 million doses from AstraZeneca. There’s also 7 million doses on pre-order from another front-running vaccine candidate made by Moderna.
Britain’s swift action drew some blowback from the European Union’s drug regulator, which said that it believed its slower and more careful approval process was the “most appropriate regulatory mechanism for use in the current pandemic emergency.”
It said that the full approval process allows for a more extensive evaluation of the data and imposes more legal requirements for safety, quality and efficacy of the vaccine on drug manufacturers.
The regulator, the European Medicines Agency, is reviewing both Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines, but does not expect to take action before the end of December.
Britain has left the European Union but remains subject to many of its regulations, including those on drugs, until Dec. 31. But E.U. rules allow individual countries to authorize unlicensed drugs during emergencies.
In a statement, Britain’s Department of Health and Social Care said that the decision to approve the vaccine “follows months of rigorous clinical trials and a thorough analysis of the data” by a panel of experts who concluded that it met the standards for safety and effectiveness. Data previously released from large-scale clinical trials showed that the vaccine had nearly 95 percent efficacy and people who were immunized displayed no serious side effects.
Britain has been racing to become the first Western country to approve a coronavirus vaccine.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson tweeted, “It’s the protection of vaccines that will ultimately allow us to reclaim our lives and get the economy moving again.”
“Help is on its way,” British Health Secretary Matt Hancock tweeted on Wednesday. “The NHS stands ready to start vaccinating early next week.”
Hancock told the BBC that he was “absolutely thrilled” by the decision and “very proud” that Britain was the first country to approve the vaccine.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla described the vaccine’s authorization as “a historic moment,” and noted that the company anticipates that it will soon be approved by other governments around the world. Pfizer and BioNTech filed for emergency use authorization in the United States on Nov. 20, with the goal of distributing the vaccine to high-risk populations by mid-December.
Biden closes in on top health leaders as pandemic ravages U.S.
InternationalDec 03. 2020Michelle Lujan Grisham, governor of New Mexico, is seen on a laptop computer speaking during the virtual Democratic National Convention on Aug. 19, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Daniel Acker.
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Josh Wingrove, Shira Stein, Alexander Ruoff
President-elect Joe Biden’s front-runner for secretary of Health and Human Services is New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, and he may announce several of his administration’s health leaders as soon as next week, according to people familiar with the matter.
The position of HHS secretary is down to two possibilities, the people said, between Lujan Grisham and former surgeon general Vivek Murthy, a co-chair of the coronavirus advisory board Biden appointed shortly after he was elected.
Biden’s health team will assume office with the U.S. still suffering from the pandemic, as virus cases and hospitalizations soared over the past month. His health secretary is expected to have input on filling other top health posts, such as FDA commissioner and the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the people said, so those appointments may not be announced until later.
The Health and Human Services secretary will have the tough task of rebuilding Obamacare, which Biden has promised to expand. That will be a difficult undertaking with a Republican-led Senate.
Murthy or Jeff Zients, who led the Obama administration effort to repair healthcare.gov, the faulty Obamacare website, may be named to a leadership role on the pandemic, according to the people familiar with the matter — a “Covid-19 czar.”
Mandy Cohen, the North Carolina state health secretary, is a favorite for CMS, the people said. Biden’s choices to lead the Food and Drug Administration appear narrowed down to David Kessler, a former commissioner of the agency who is another co-chair of his coronavirus advisory board, and Joshua Sharfstein, a former FDA official who is a vice dean at Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Biden announced his economic team on Tuesday, a group led by Treasury Secretary-designate Janet Yellen whose top priority will be restoring jobs eliminated by the pandemic. An announcement on some of his health team could come as soon as Monday, the people said.
The people familiar with the matter asked not to be identified because talks are still ongoing and no final decision has been made. It’s not clear how many people will be announced at once, or which positions would later be filled by the health secretary once the Biden administration is in place.
Biden’s transition team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The U.S. recorded 158,000 new coronavirus infections on Monday and a record 205,000 cases three days earlier. Biden will take office as distribution of coronavirus vaccines ramps up, and he has warned that any delay in the transition to his administration could slow or complicate that endeavor.
Lujan Grisham is seen as having an easier path to confirmation than Murthy, who has spoken out against gun violence as a public health threat and may draw strong opposition from Senate Republicans as a result, the people familiar with the matter said.
If he isn’t nominated to lead HHS, Murthy is under consideration as Covid-19 czar or another role, including a second stint as surgeon general, the people said. Murthy talks to Biden almost every day as co-chair of his advisory board and is seen as having influential supporters.
Murthy and Zients have also represented Biden’s transition team on calls with current HHS officials, two of the people said.
Biden’s team is still discussing what the White House coronavirus task force and Operation Warp Speed — the Trump administration’s effort to fast-track vaccines — will look like under the new administration.
If Biden announces his health team next week, he may be just days ahead of the first emergency FDA approval of a coronavirus vaccine. President Donald Trump is planning a vaccine summit next week at the White House, while an FDA advisory panel is scheduled to meet on Dec. 10 to discuss the shots.
Vice President Mike Pence told governors this week that the vaccines could start being delivered as soon as the week of Dec. 14.
InternationalDec 03. 2020President-elect Joe Biden announces his economic team Tuesday in Wilmington, Del. Biden is facing complaints from some that he has so far largely put Black officials in lower-profile positions or in jobs that include “deputy” in the title. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Demetrius Freeman
By The Washington Post · Annie Linskey, Matt Viser
WASHINGTON – Representatives from seven of the country’s leading civil rights organizations are pressing to meet with President-elect Joe Biden in coming days, escalating pressure on him to appoint Black nominees to the remaining high-profile Cabinet posts amid concern that White nominees have dominated so far.
Wally Adeyemo, President-elect Joe Biden’s pick for deputy treasury secretary, speaks at the introduction of Biden’s economic team Tuesday in Wilmington, Del. Adeyemo would be the first Black person to serve in that role. Biden’s team noted that he has so far named fewer than a quarter of the federal positions he plans to highlight. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Demetrius Freeman
Biden has rolled out a diverse set of appointments but reserved the initial marquee slots in the Cabinet and White House for White candidates, prompting worry that Biden is failing to make good on his promises to promote Black leaders to prominent jobs.
Derrick Johnson, the president of the NAACP, said Tuesday that he was baffled that Biden has failed to confirm a meeting with the civil rights groups nearly a month after Election Day.
“We have not had any communication with the president-elect, so we have no concept of what to expect next,” Johnson said, noting that Biden has been a longtime member of the organization and that the NAACP pushed hard for his election. “That’s somewhat concerning to us.”
“But for the black community support for him, he would not be in office,” he said.
Prominent advocates, and members of Congress who typically keep a lower profile, also expressed disappointment in the fledgling Biden administration – in some cases saying they hoped that sounding the alarm would influence Biden’s thinking as he fills out his government.
“I really thought – at this stage of the game – I would see more African American appointments in the top positions,” said Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J., a member of the Congressional Black Caucus who endorsed Biden in the Democratic primary. “And I would have had more of a sense of confidence that there would be more African American men and women appointed to positions at the highest level of government.”
“We are capable of being in those lead positions,” Watson Coleman added. “I don’t see that yet. And that’s disappointing to me.”
Clayola Brown, president of the A. Philip Randolph Institute, a Black trade union group, said Biden had “fallen a bit more than just short” of expectations with regard to appointing Black officials – particularly in naming Black women to “meaningful positions inside of this administration.”
Biden’s transition team confirmed it had received a request for a meeting from the seven groups. Biden officials said they have “engaged” with some of the groups individually, including the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the Urban League. They did not confirm that the requested meeting would take place.
Biden has nominated longtime diplomat Linda Thomas-Greenfield, a Black former Foreign Service officer, to be ambassador to the United Nations. And on Tuesday, he introduced six key members of his economics team, a group that includes Wally Adeyemo, who would be the first African American deputy treasury secretary, and Cecilia Rouse, who would be the first Black official to serve as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers. The group also included Neera Tanden, who would be the first woman of color – her parents were from India – to lead the Office of Management and Budget. All require Senate confirmation.
But those raising concerns cited Biden choosing White officials for top jobs at the state and treasury departments as well White House positions including chief of staff, national security adviser and press secretary. Instead, they said, Biden has so far largely put Black officials in lower-profile positions or in jobs that include “deputy” in the title.
Their focus now is on positions including defense secretary and attorney general. They argue that Biden’s decisions about those two key roles could affect the two runoff Senate races in Georgia – which will determine which party controls the upper chamber. Democrats need a strong turnout by Black voters to win those races.
“In order to win Georgia you have to have a very energized African American voting base,” Johnson said. “At the very minimum you shouldn’t do anything to dampen the energy and enthusiasm of that base. Who he appoints to what position could very well do that.”
Biden officials noted that so far half of the Cabinet-level positions feature people of color and that 10 Black officials have been named to key jobs. Biden has broken four racial barriers with his nominations, including naming Alejandro Mayorkas to be the first Hispanic to lead the Department of Homeland Security.
Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will be the first woman, first Black woman and first Asian American woman to fill the job. Biden has pledged to name the first Black woman to the Supreme Court should an opening arise.
“His success in finding diverse voices to develop and implement his policy vision to tackle our nation’s toughest challenges will be clear when our full slate of appointees and nominees is complete,” said Cameron French, a spokesman for the Biden transition.
Other groups besides the seven requesting a meeting have also weighed in: In Late November, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus wrote to Biden urging him to make sure his appointments would reflect their population in the United States.
Janet Murguía, president of the Latino organization UnidosUS, said there was an initial burst of excitement about Mayorkas’s selection for the Homeland Security post.
“We think that’s a great start, but there’s much more to do in terms of seeing more representation at the highest levels,” Murguía said. “There’s still many roles to be filled. We’re encouraged by what we’ve seen so far. But there are some key roles we believe could be filled by key high-profile Hispanics.”
Biden’s team noted that he has so far named fewer than a quarter of the federal positions he plans to highlight. For example, Susan Rice, who is African American and was on Biden’s shortlist for secretary of state and vice president, will get a “key job” in the Biden administration, according to a person in direct contact with the president-elect.
Still, the civil rights leaders say they are focused on top positions.
“Those of us that have had access to administrations know the difference between first tier and second tier,” said the Rev. Al Sharpton, who is among those hoping to meet with Biden.
Sharpton noted that President Barack Obama had two Black attorneys general during his eight years in the White House. “The expectation among the civil rights community and the Black community here is not unfounded,” Sharpton said.
He and others have promoted Deval Patrick, the former Massachusetts governor who ran the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division during the Clinton administration, as well as Tony West, a former associate attorney general during the Obama administration. They also have signaled that Sen. Doug Jones, D-Ala., who was defeated in November, would be palatable. Jones is White but has a strong civil rights background, most notably when as a U.S. attorney he prosecuted Ku Klux Klan members for the 1963 bombing of a Birmingham church in which four young Black girls were killed.
“We had a reckoning of race with George Floyd,” Sharpton said. “To answer that without an attorney general who not only has a sensitivity but a background in protecting people with police reform and voting rights would be something that would be very displeasing if not insulting to the community he promised to represent on the night he was elected.”
“It was Joe Biden who said the African American community has his back and he’ll have ours,” he added. “We would assume, but we’ll see, in the appointments.”
Regarding the Defense slot, Michèle Flournoy, a former undersecretary of defense for policy in the Obama administration who is White, has long been regarded as a leading candidate to become the first female defense secretary.
But over the past few weeks, two Black candidates have been floated: Jeh Johnson, a secretary of homeland security in the Obama administration, and Lloyd Austin, a retired Army general.
The NAACP’s Johnson said it’s a “problem” that he and other civil rights leaders have not yet heard from Biden about setting a time for a meeting. In addition to the NAACP, the group includes representatives from the Urban League and Sharpton’s National Action Network, among others.
“It’s very important that this meeting with the historic civil rights leaders takes place,” said Marc Morial, the president and CEO of the National Urban League. “We want to have the conversation and we want to establish the relationship – and a relationship is one where there will be times we will be supportive, and there may be times we have to object.
“There’s high expectations about the diversity of the Cabinet,” Morial said. “And we think the expectation is, when it comes to the Cabinet [of] this incoming administration, it will exceed the high-water marks of Clinton and Obama.”
Biden’s promise to Black voters was reiterated during his victory speech the night he was declared president-elect. “The African American community stood up again for me. You’ve always had my back, and I’ll have yours,” he said.
It was a reference to support from Black voters during the general election. Black voters backed Biden by wide margins in several key states that had gone for President Trump in 2016. In Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, which secured his electoral college advantage, about 9 in 10 Black voters sided with Biden, exit polls showed.
During the Democratic primary, Biden’s candidacy was revived in South Carolina after he was endorsed by the powerful Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C. Clyburn, however, is also among those concerned about Biden’s appointments. “I want to see where the process leads to, what it produces,” Clyburn told Juan Williams, a columnist for The Hill newspaper. “But so far it’s not good.”
He and others have been pushing Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, for a possible nomination as agriculture secretary. Biden has indicated he is reluctant to select House or Senate members for jobs because it could dilute the party’s power on Capitol Hill.
“It is critically important that Black women’s leadership be well represented in your Cabinet and throughout the Administration,” according to a letter signed by two dozen officials who lead groups promoting Black women.
The letter was organized by Melanie Campbell, president of the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation and convener of the Black Women’s Roundtable, who said in addition to Agriculture she is pushing for a Black woman to run at least one other major department, such as Housing and Urban Development; Education; Health and Human Services; or Justice.
“We are appreciative of the staff positions,” Campbell said. “But where are the Black women in the statutory Cabinet positions?”
Barr says he hasn’t seen fraud that could affect the election outcome
InternationalDec 03. 2020Attorney General William Barr appears before the House Judiciary Committee in July. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Matt McClain
By The Washington Post · Matt Zapotosky, Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey
WASHINGTON – Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday that he has “not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” undercutting claims that President Donald Trump and his allies have made – without evidence – of widespread and significant voting irregularities.
His comments to the Associated Press, while caveated, make Barr the highest-ranking Trump administration official to break with the president on his allegation that the election was stolen, and they might offer political cover to other Republicans to stake out similar positions.
Trump himself, though, has shown no sign of backing down, and some of his Capitol Hill allies were critical of Barr’s assertions. Trump’s relationship with his attorney general was already deteriorating, with the president frustrated that Barr was unwilling to launch aggressive measures to support his fraud claims or take other steps that might benefit his reelection campaign.
At the same time Barr’s comments became public Tuesday, the Justice Department revealed that the attorney general had, in October, secretly appointed U.S. Attorney John Durham of Connecticut as special counsel examining how the FBI investigated the Trump campaign in 2016 and beyond – a move that might hearten Trump and his allies.
Barr assigned Durham to run the investigation last year, but the order to install him as special counsel is likely to ensure that his work is not shut down by the incoming administration of Joe Biden, a concern voiced by people close to Barr.
Under Justice Department regulations, special counsels can be dismissed only for misconduct or some other good cause, making it more difficult for the next attorney general to end Durham’s investigation, in addition to the political cost that would come with short-circuiting the probe.
Barr has been accused of using his position as the country’s top law enforcement official to help Trump win reelection and amplify his unfounded claims of electoral malfeasance.
Before the election, he warned repeatedly and forcefully about fraud that might come with mass mail-in voting, echoing the president’s attacks on the practice. Afterward, he reversed long-standing Justice Department policy and authorized prosecutors to take overt steps to pursue allegations of “vote tabulation irregularities” in certain cases before results were certified. To date, none have done so.
Barr’s memo, though, authorized actions only in cases that could change the outcome of the election, and officials have previously told The Washington Post that they were aware of no such investigations or evidence that would warrant them.
Since it became clear that Biden won, Trump and his allies have sought to discredit the election’s results, mounting unsuccessful court challenges and publicly decrying what they claim to be fraud and other irregularities. But even with Barr’s directive in place, the attorney general met Trump and his allies’ claims with silence. A group of 16 assistant U.S. attorneys even wrote to Barr to say they had not seen evidence of any substantial anomalies.
A person who spoke with Trump on Monday said he was railing against governors in Republican states – particularly in Georgia and Arizona – who would not back up his claims of fraud and were proceeding to certify election results. Barr’s comments take away another valuable ally in his cause, which is expected to go nowhere, but Trump nevertheless is unlikely to give it up until at least after the electoral college votes Dec. 14, this person said.
An administration official, like others speaking on the condition of anonymity to detail a sensitive topic, told The Post that in recent months, Barr and Trump have “barely spoken,” though they did have a conversation the week before Thanksgiving.
Before the election, the president was frustrated that Durham was not producing public results that might discredit his political opponents and aid his reelection bid. Then, Trump became upset that the Justice Department was not doing more to support his claims of massive fraud, nor coming out publicly to support his claims, officials said.
Trump made his displeasure known. In October, after it was reported that Durham would not release a report before the election, the president said that the delay was “a disgrace” and that he would relay his thoughts directly to Barr.
“If that’s the case, I’m very disappointed,” Trump said during an interview with radio host Rush Limbaugh. “I think it’s a terrible thing. And I’ll say it to his face.”
This past weekend, Trump took aim at the Justice Department and the FBI over their failure to back his election fraud claims.
“Where are they? I’ve not seen anything,” he told Fox News.
The president also suggested that the bureau and the Justice Department were possibly “involved,” though he did not offer any evidence or further clarity.
Administration officials said those public disputes have also played out in private. Trump has complained to advisers about his attorney general, two officials said, and the frustration has filtered to Barr even as the men have talked less frequently.
The president has also been annoyed that Barr has expressed support for FBI Director Christopher Wray, whose public statements contradicting Trump – about election security and domestic extremism – have made him a frequent target of the president’s rage, an administration official said.
“There have been clashes,” the official said.
In the Associated Press interview, Barr said the FBI and the Justice Department had looked into some fraud claims, and suggested they had not found what the president and his allies have asserted. Barr seemed to take particular aim at one claim by lawyer Sidney Powell, who alleged a grand conspiracy in which election software changed voting tallies.
“There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud, and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that,” Barr told the Associated Press, referring to the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice.
Barr did not rule out any instances of fraud or election irregularities. He said that most of the claims of fraud that had come to the department were “very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct. They are not systemic allegations. And those have been run down; they are being run down.”
“Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes,” he said. “They have been followed up on.”
After the interview was published, a Justice Department spokesperson issued a statement attacking some of the reporting on it and declaring, “The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible.”
In a statement, Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney, and Jenna Ellis, a legal adviser to the campaign, said, “With all due respect to the Attorney General, there hasn’t been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation.” The two lawyers have been leading Trump’s effort to attack the results of the election, and though they have appeared with Powell, they have said publicly that she is not formally working for Trump. Powell did not return an email seeking comment.
In recent weeks, officials said, Trump has been speaking with Giuliani and Ellis extensively, believing that his other advisers are too skeptical about his claims or too pessimistic about his chances.
“Nonetheless, we will continue our pursuit of the truth through the judicial system and state legislatures, and continue toward the Constitution’s mandate and ensuring that every legal vote is counted and every illegal vote is not,” their statement said. “Again, with the greatest respect to the Attorney General, his opinion appears to be without any knowledge or investigation of the substantial irregularities and evidence of systemic fraud.”
Some Republicans similarly took aim at the Justice Department after Barr’s comments. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida said on Fox Business that the department “has a lot of egg on their face having not discovered a lot of the fraud as it was occurring.” Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin called on Barr to show more of what investigators had discovered.
“I think there is still enough questions outstanding,” Johnson said, according to CNN.
Even as news broke of Barr’s statements to the Associated Press, Trump was tweeting about “hundreds of thousands of fraudulent (FAKE) ballots” and a news conference advancing similar claims. Barr was spotted at the White House, though an official said that was for a meeting with Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, not the president.
In the interview with the Associated Press, Barr endeavored to make clear that whatever disputes Trump might have with the election, the Justice Department is not the appropriate institution to resolve them. The department, he said, examines crimes, while state or local officials audit voting results.
“There’s a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of a default fix-all, and people don’t like something, they want the Department of Justice to come in and ‘investigate,’ ” Barr said.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., surmised that Barr’s comments would probably result in the attorney general being terminated.
“I guess he’s the next one to be fired, since he now too says there’s no fraud,” Schumer said. “Trump seems to fire anyone in that regard.”
Christopher Krebs, who had led the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, one of the key federal agencies charged with safeguarding the vote, was fired last month after he publicly defended the integrity of the election count. Shortly before his dismissal, Krebs refuted allegations made by the president’s supporters that election systems had been manipulated, tweeting that “59 election security experts all agree, ‘in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.’ “
Durham’s appointment as special counsel, meanwhile, drew a more predictable reaction, as it was embraced by Republicans and decried by Democrats.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he hoped that Democrats show “the same respect” they gave to former special counsel Robert Mueller III when he led the Russia inquiry. “This important investigation must be allowed to proceed free from political interference,” said Graham. “The American people deserve a full accounting of this wrongdoing.”
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said that the Durham appointment smacked of politics and that the attorney general “is using the special counsel law for a purpose it was not intended: to continue a politically motivated investigation long after Barr leaves office.”
The attorney general’s order, signed Oct. 19 but kept secret until now, said that after consulting with Durham, Barr had “determined that, in light of extraordinary circumstances relating to these matters, the public interest warrants Mr. Durham continuing this investigation pursuant to the powers and independence afforded by the Special Counsel regulations.”
A Justice Department official said the White House was not made aware of the appointment at that time and learned only Tuesday.
As special counsel, Durham is authorized to investigate “whether any federal official, employee, or any other person or entity violated the law in connection with the intelligence, counterintelligence, or law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns, individuals associated with those campaigns, and individuals associated with the administration of President Donald J. Trump, including but not limited to Crossfire Hurricane and the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III.”
Crossfire Hurricane is the name FBI agents gave to their investigation of Trump campaign associates whom they suspected might be involved with Russian election interference. Mueller took over that probe after Trump fired Wray’s predecessor, James Comey.
In a letter to lawmakers Tuesday explaining his decision, Barr said that although he had expected Durham to finish his work by the summer, delays created by the coronavirus pandemic and the discovery of additional information pushed back that timeline.
“In advance of the presidential election, I decided to appoint Mr. Durham as a Special Counsel to provide him and his team with the assurance that they could complete their work, without regard to the outcome of the election,” Barr wrote.
The letter states that Barr waited to make that decision public until after the election, though it does not indicate why he waited until December to do so. Some lawyers questioned whether he had misused Justice Department regulations to appoint a department employee – Durham – as special counsel, when the regulation states that a special counsel “shall be selected from outside the United States Government.”
Barr’s order appointing Durham seems to try to circumvent that requirement by citing another department regulation stating the attorney general can appoint a Justice Department officer to “conduct any kind of legal proceeding.”
The incoming Biden administration could, in theory, rewrite the special counsel regulation to make it easier to dismiss Durham or otherwise change his mandate, but that would probably provoke anger among Republicans.
“What Barr thinks he’s doing is ensuring Durham’s work can continue beyond the end of this administration, because the regulations don’t allow the attorney general to fire the special counsel except for cause,” said Gregory Brower, a former senior FBI official. “The next administration may be stuck with Durham, but as long as Durham is playing it straight, that’s not a terrible thing. Arguably the new administration doesn’t have a dog in this fight.”
IRA มีการกิจสร้าง “ฟาร์มโทรลล์” หรือกลุ่มบัญชีที่เข้าไปก่อกวนและโน้มน้าวความคิดทางการเมืองผู้ใช้อินเทอร์เน็ต IRA ได้สร้างบัญชีโซเชียลมีเดียหลายพันบัญชีที่ปลอมตัวเป็นชาวอเมริกันที่สนับสนุนกลุ่มการเมืองหัวรุนแรงและวางแผนหรือส่งเสริมกิจกรรมเพื่อสนับสนุนทรัมป์และต่อต้านคลินตัน และเผยแพร่บทความเท็จและการบิดเบือนข้อมูลจากสื่อที่รัฐบาลรัสเซียแล้วแพร่กระจายในโซเชียลมีเดีย ยังไม่นับการส่งแฮ็คเกอร์เข้าโจมตีเว็บไซต์สำคัญๆ ทางการเมืองในสหรัฐโดยตรง ปรากฎว่าปฏิบัติการของ IRA สามารถเข้าถึงผู้ใช้โซเชียลมีเดียหลายล้านคนระหว่างปี 2013 ถึง 2017
ในเรื่องนี้ สตานิสลาฟ ซาริน โฆษกของผู้ประสานงานด้านบริการพิเศษซึ่งดูแลหน่วยงานด้านความมั่นคงของโปแลนด์ประกาศว่าแฮกเกอร์ได้บุกเว็บไซต์ของ War Studies University ของโปแลนด์และบิดเบือนข้อมูลโดยได้โพสต์จดหมายที่หัวหน้ามหาวิทยาลัยอธิบายว่ากองกำลังของสหรัฐในโปแลนด์เป็น “การยึดครองของชาวอเมริกัน” เจ้าหน้าที่ของโปแลนด์กล่าวว่าจดหมายปลอมฉบับดังกล่าวถูกแพร่ต่อโดยเว็บไซต์ของโปแลนด์อย่างน้อยสามแห่งโดยหนึ่งแห่งมีประวัติการสนับสนุนการบิดเบือนข้อมูล
The Pfizer logo at a Pfizer facility in Puurs, Belgium, on Nov. 10, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Geert Vanden Wijngaert.. 
Michelle Lujan Grisham, governor of New Mexico, is seen on a laptop computer speaking during the virtual Democratic National Convention on Aug. 19, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Daniel Acker. 
President-elect Joe Biden announces his economic team Tuesday in Wilmington, Del. Biden is facing complaints from some that he has so far largely put Black officials in lower-profile positions or in jobs that include “deputy” in the title. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Demetrius Freeman 
Attorney General William Barr appears before the House Judiciary Committee in July. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Matt McClain 
ประเทศที่ทำไอโอมากที่สุดในโลกและสำเร็จมากที่สุด รัสเซียทำอย่างไรและกำลังมุ่งไปทางไหน
สหราชอาณาจักรอนุมัติวัคซีนจากไฟเซอร์และไบโอเอ็นเทค เริ่มฉีดสัปดาห์หน้า
โจชัว หว่อง พร้อมนักเคลื่อนไหวอีก 2 คนถูกศาลตัดสินจำคุก
จอห์น เคอร์รี ขึ้นแท่นว่าที่ทูตพิเศษด้านสภาพภูมิอากาศคนแรกของสหรัฐ
ผลการศึกษาของสหรัฐพบสัญญาณบ่งชี้ว่าไวรัสโคโรนาเกิดขึ้นในสหรัฐก่อนที่จะมีการยืนยันการระบาดในอู่ฮั่น
ประธานสหภาพนักศึกษาฮ่องกงถูกจับกุมตัวข้อหาพกอาวุธหลังซื้ออุปกรณ์ยิงเลเซอร์
