Eleven Media’s executive editors Kyaw Zaw Lin and Nayi Min and chief reporter Phyo Wai Win were arrested in October but allowed out on bail after a few weeks in detention.

They were accused of incitement after an article raised questions about budgeting within the city government, which is run by Phyo Min Thein, a close confidante of civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Article 505 (b) criminalises published or circulated information that causes “fear or alarm to the public”.

The case prompted an outcry amid fears of declining press freedom in Suu Kyi’s Myanmar and was lodged weeks after Reuters reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were sentenced to seven years on state secrets charges while reporting on a massacre of Rohingya Muslims.

But the lawyer for Eleven Media’s staff said the Yangon government had sent a letter to the court asking to drop the charges and take up their grievance through arbitration at Myanmar’s Press Council.

“The judge allowed them to withdraw and gave a verdict (Friday) right away. So the case is finished,” lawyer Kyee Myint told AFP.

In an interview on Thursday, however, Phyo Min Thein told state media the city government would seek a correction through the council, and could resume the legal tack if it was not satisfied with the outcome.

“If they do not follow and if negotiation by the press council is not a success, we will continue this case legally,” he said.

Cases against journalists in Myanmar have further tarnished the reputation of one-time rights icon Suu Kyi, whose legacy fell apart during the Rohingya crisis.

Suu Kyi has said little in defence of the Reuters journalists, who will have spent a year in prison next month. They are appealing.

The refusal by immigration officials to let in the FT’s Asia news editor Victor Mallet Thursday came hours after an arts centre hosting the city’s high-profile literary festival cancelled appearances by exiled Chinese writer Ma Jian.

On Friday a second venue which had agreed to host the author’s two speaking events also pulled out.

The literary festival had announced late Thursday that Ma’s talks would be hosted at the central Annex exhibition space, but the venue said in a statement to AFP Friday it had “no affiliation with the event or the author” and would not host him.

Ma, a Hong Kong permanent resident and British passport holder, is due to land in the city on Friday afternoon and has expressed concern he will also be refused entry.

Amnesty International said the refusal to allow Mallet in was a “distressing signal” about the state of press freedom in Hong Kong and smacked of “retaliation” against Mallet.

The veteran journalist had already had his work visa renewal denied last month and had left Hong Kong, but was barred when he tried to come back in for a short stay as a visitor.

British citizens are usually allowed into Hong Kong without a visa and are permitted to stay for 180 days under immigration rules.

The government has given no explanation for the original refusal to extend his visa but it is widely believed the decision was linked to Mallet’s chairing of a talk by a Hong Kong independence activist at the city’s Foreign Correspondents’ Club (FCC), where he is first vice president.

China’s foreign ministry had asked for the event to be cancelled.

The FT has said it would appeal against the original visa denial.

Security minister John Lee insisted Friday the decision to prevent Mallet from entering as a tourist was “nothing to do with freedom of expression and freedom of the press” adding he would not reveal the reasons due to “data privacy” and the risk of “prejudice” to immigration policy.

The FCC said it was “shocked and baffled” and described the move as an “aggravated and disproportionate sanction that seems completely unfounded”.

– ‘Authoritarian attempt’ –

Authorities have turned away British nationals before — activist Benedict Rogers, deputy chairman of the Conservative Party’s human rights commission, was blocked by immigration after landing for what he said was a private trip in 2017.

Rogers called the barring of Mallet a “bizarre decision” for a global financial hub.

Human Rights Watch warned the gathering crackdown on freedoms by Hong Kong and Chinese authorities had led to “spreading censorship and self-censorship”.

Hong Kong enjoys freedoms unseen on the mainland, protected by an agreement made before the city was handed back by Britain to China in 1997, but there is growing evidence those rights are being eroded.

Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong said barring Mallet was “nothing less than an authoritarian attempt to censor all opposing voices”.

But pro-Beijing legislator Regina Ip defended the decision and accused Mallet of coming into Hong Kong to “test the bottom line” of the government.

“If the government’s view is that this person was involved in assisting and providing a platform for people who are advocating dividing the country… I think the immigration department’s decision is reasonable,” Ip told reporters.

Another pro-Beijing lawmaker Michael Tien told AFP: “You cannot take everything for granted,” adding it was the government’s right to decide on visas.

The Tai Kwun arts centre, a major new cultural hub in Hong Kong, pulled talks by dissident author Ma on Thursday, with venue director Timothy Calnin saying it did not want to become “a platform to promote the political interests of any individual”.

Director of the diplomatic academy of Vietnam, Nguyen Vu Tung, spoke at the 10th South China Sea International Conference on co-operation for regional security and development yesterday, stating that over the past 10 years, the conference has attracted the participation of 300 scholars and 2,000 Vietnamese and international participants as well as institutes and universities.

“We have built up a network of scholars and experts studying the South China Sea, promoting trust and more open discussion over the past 10 years. The South China Sea has been included in main policy planning among nations,” Tung said.

“Although efforts have been made by countries in the region to ease tensions and increase security, the South China Sea still presents complicated problems that need effective solutions through discussions,” he said.

He said the conference this year in Vietnam will focus on discussions and sharing among scholars and experts.

Speaking at the opening ceremony yesterday, Kriangsak Kittichairasee, a judge from the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, said the conference initiative, which started 10 years ago, has helped explore ways and means for better conflict management and resolution in the South China Sea.

“We have recently heard some good news about the progress towards the conclusion of a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea that will hopefully contribute to the practical confidence building, preventive diplomacy, and eventually dispute resolution of conflicts in the South China Sea,” Kriangsak Kittichairasee said.

“That such a code is ever needed is a mystery for public international lawyers like myself. International law is the law of peace, as codified in various pertinent provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and peremptory norms of international law for which no derogation is permitted,” he said.

Kriangsak Kittichairasee added that co-operation for regional peace and development in the South China Sea has to be based on four elements: conflict prevention; crisis management; dispute settlement, and monitoring and review mechanisms.

“In our world of realpolitik, political will has often become a prerequisite in the conduct of international relations. This political will should not be indispensable to the fulfillment of international legal obligations, especially the peremptory norms against the use of force in violation of the UN Charter or against acquisition of territories by force,” he said.

Saranya Hasanthi Urugodawatte Dissanayake, ambassador of Sri Lanka to Vietnam, said she highly appreciated the initiative of co-operation for regional security and development of the conference.

“Trade is what makes your political interest more dynamic. Asean, India and regional independence is the most important factor, so in that context economic interests dominate everything. Dialogue is very important to put forward or show off military strategy. I believe dialogue, talking and economic discussions like this conference are valuable. That way we move forward, not using might. Discussion is the way for all of countries,” she said, adding that people will be aware of what countries are doing to solve the issue.

Carl Thayer, from the University of New South Wales, School of Humanities and Social Sciences at the Australian Defence Force Academy, said maintaining national unity is a strong component through which Vietnam has built a strong position in keeping stability and peace in the South China Sea over the past 10 years.

“At the moment the most important thing Vietnam can do is ensure that the ASEAN-China Single Draft South China Sea Code of Conduct Negotiating Test, agreed on 3 August this year, is rigorous and specific about the adherence of all parties, including China, to comply with international law and refrain from using force or threats of force and to treat fishermen humanely. Vietnam has made major submissions included in the Single Draft Negotiating Text, it needs to lobby other ASEAN members to support Vietnam’s proposals,” he told Vietnam News on the sidelines of the conference.

He said Vietnam was seeking a position as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council in the 2020-21 tenure.

“Vietnam need to better network and coordinate the operations of its Coast Guard with Vietnam’s fishing fleet so the Coast Guard can render timely assistance,” he told Vietnam News regarding the fact that Vietnamese  fishing boats have been rammed by Chinese ships in the South China Sea. “Vietnam should continue to use diplomatic channels to protest to Beijing. This issue figures prominently in the Single Draft Negotiating Text. Even China and the Philippines has jointly prosed that fishermen be treated humanely. Vietnam needs to enlist the support of other ASEAN members and its strategic partners to pressure the Chinese government to be more proactive in stopping this harassment.”

Lawyer Hoang Viet from HCM City’s Law University said participants reviewed the progress and movements among countries in the region over the past decade.

Viet said some scholars blamed China’s illegal construction on rocks and reefs in the South China Sea, or East Sea, for raising tensions in the region.

He said participants also discussed the progress of the completion of the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea and the possibility of a joint-exploitation deal between China and the Philippines in the region.

However, 89-year-old Marcos can appeal the ruling and post bail, which would allow her to remain free while the case grinds through the country’s notoriously slow justice system.

The verdict from the anti-graft Sandiganbayan court orders her to serve a minimum of six years behind bars over charges the Marcoses funnelled roughly $200 million through Swiss foundations decades ago.

Ferdinand Marcos, who along with cronies was accused of pilfering $10 billion from the Philippines, fled with his family to the US after a people’s uprising ended his 20-year rule in 1986.

Marcos died in 1989 while still in exile. But his heirs later returned to Manila and have since staged a political comeback. Imelda Marcos is currently a congresswoman.

As a government official in the Marcos administration, Imelda was barred by law from having any financial interest from the Swiss foundations, said the ruling.

“The couple opened all those accounts in Switzerland, and they used pseudonyms to hide their ownership. The president chose William Saunders and Imelda Marcos used Jane Ryan,” special prosecutor Ryan Quilala told reporters.

Her lawyers could not be reached, while a press aide told AFP there was no immediate comment.

Court officials said Marcos would be able to avoid incarceration by posting an as yet undetermined bail and has the right to appeal her conviction to the nation’s highest legal authority, the Supreme Court.

The body has previously undone a case against Imelda, overturning a 24 year jail sentence in 1993 on graft charges. She ran for congress and won while her appeal was underway.

The family’s notoriety stems back to Ferdinand Marcos declaring martial law in 1972. That allowed him to shutter the legislature, muzzle the free press and jail or kill those who dared to oppose his dictatorship.

In the decades since Marcos’s ouster the effort to recover the pilfered money has been halting and uneven.

However, the Philippine Supreme Court in 2003 ordered $680 million in funds stashed by the Marcoses in Swiss banks handed to the government.

The funds had earlier been turned over by the Swiss judiciary after concluding that the funds were stolen from the Manila government.

The younger generation of Marcoses have led high-profile careers, despite the dark past associated with their name.

Imelda and Ferdinand’s daughter Imee Marcos, is the governor of the family’s northern stronghold of Ilocos Norte province and helped bankroll the 2016 election campaign of President Rodrigo Duterte, according to him.

Imelda’s son, also named Ferdinand, almost won the separate election for vice president that year.

He has put the count under protest and hopes to run for president after Duterte’s term ends in mid-2022.

Witnesses said the man began attacking pedestrians near a pickup truck apparently belonging to the attacker which had exploded into flames.

Australian police said one person died at the scene and another two others were being treated for their injuries.

They said the suspect, who was hospitalised in a critical condition, had no known links to terrorism.

Witness footage showed police struggling for at least a minute to corral a large man wearing a dark tunic as he lunged, slashed and stabbed wildly at two officers.

At least two members of the public bravely tried to help police. One man was armed with a cafe chair while another — swiftly dubbed an “Aussie hero” on social media — repeatedly tried to ram the suspect with an empty metal shopping cart.

But as the attacks continued unabated, eventually one officer opted for lethal force, shooting the suspect in the chest.

“A man was arrested at the scene and has been taken to hospital under police guard in a critical condition,” police Superintendent David Clayton said.

“There is no known link to terrorism at this stage,” Clayton added. “We will keep an open mind as to whether there is any link. It’s very early stage of the investigation.”

Police warned people to avoid the area and created a three-block-wide exclusion zone as the bomb squad was dispatched to secure the area and examine the vehicle after the fire was extinguished.

Officers said they “are not looking for anyone further at this early stage”.

“The exact circumstances are yet to be determined… The area has been cordoned off,” police said, as they called for “anyone with information or who witnessed the incident is asked to go to Melbourne West Police Station to make a statement.”

Forensic investigators combed through the scene late Friday, where the dead victim’s body lay covered in a white plastic sheet.

Melbourne is Australia’s second largest city, a cosmopolitan metropolis of almost five million people famed for its cafes, bars, restaurants and high standard of living.

Friday’s attack is a double blow for the city as it coincides with an ongoing the murder trial of 28-year-old James Gargasoulas, who ploughed his car into crowds in the same area in 2017, killing six people.