#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.
In reversal, Starbucks will allow employees to wear ‘Black Lives Matter’ T-shirts
Jun 13. 2020
By The Washington Post · Hannah Denham · BUSINESS
Reversing course just two days after news reports sparked a social media backlash, Starbucks says it will now allow employees to wear T-shirts and accessories in support of Black Lives Matter.
“We see you. We hear you. Black Lives Matter. That is a fact and will never change,” the company said in a letter posted Friday. “This movement is a catalyst for change, and right now, it’s telling us a lot of things need to be addressed so we can make space to heal.”
Earlier this week, and first reported by BuzzFeed, the company turned down a request from baristas and other employees who wanted to show their support for the BLM movement. In a memo to its 250,000-member workforce, Diversity Officer Zing Shaw said “there are agitators who misconstrue the fundamental principles of the Black Lives Matter movement – and in certain circumstances, intentionally repurpose them to amplifying divisiveness.”
The decision sparked backlash on social media, including calls to boycott the company, and came just days after Starbucks had issued a “Black Lives Matter” statement of solidarity and committed $1 million to racial justice groups as protests broke out across the country following the death of George Floyd, a black man, in police custody.
On Friday, in a posting signed by Shaw, Chief Operating Officer Roz Brewer and Executive Vice President Rossann Williams, the company said it is producing T-shirts with “Black Lives Matter” and other slogans for staff in the United States and Canada to “demonstrate our allyship and show we stand together in unity.” Employees, which the company refers to as “partners,” will have the option to wear them while working.
A company spokeswoman declined to say what exactly prompted the reversal – whether it was two days of social media calls for boycotts against the coffee chain or the current unrest in Seattle, the company’s home base and where protests have led to an activist takeover of a four-block, police-free autonomous zone.
Hailey Glick, who has worked as a Starbucks barista in Raleigh, N.C., since September, said she learned of the initial denial of BLM attire through an unofficial employee Facebook group. She said she initially thought the company was simply applying its official dress code policy, which prohibits personal accessories that advocate for a political, religious or personal issue – until her co-workers pointed out that the company sends employees shirts, cups and other merchandise to wear while on the clock during Pride Month.
“If we can stand up for LGBTQ rights, why can’t we stand up for black lives and people of color?” she said.
Glick’s manager knew she attended protests in Raleigh and was supportive, she said, but that might not be the case at stores in other cities.
“I was very pleased with the reversal of the decision, and I think it’s the right move. The only thing that I think makes me hesitate and probably makes the company hesitate too is how and where we draw the line,” Glick said. “What’s to stop someone wearing a MAGA hat or a MAGA shirt or a MAGA pin? I think what it ultimately comes down to is our values as a company.”
Bryant Simon, a historian at Temple University who wrote a book about Starbucks and American culture in 2009, said the company’s initial position was a “particular Starbucks dance.” The reversal, he said, came as a surprise.
“Lots of mass companies with a really big audience don’t want to have a public political statement and alienate their audience,” he said. “They can’t be Ben & Jerry’s. They’re just too big of a company for that. Their audience is too big, their investments are too big, their stores are in too many places for them to make a statement as strong as Ben & Jerry’s did.”
What’s tricky about Starbucks, Simon said, is that it markets its “third place” for customers (after home and work) without embracing the political discussion that comes with public spheres. It’s not just about the coffee.
“A kind of political presence has always been part of Starbucks proposition, the idea that they could make a difference in the world,” he said. “You’re buying some kind of identity, and that identity has a politics to it, but that’s something that is kind of a slippery slope when you’re a mass company.”
It’s not the first time the company has been in the spotlight for racial issues. When a female employee at a Philadelphia Starbucks store called the police on two black men sitting inside in April 2018, protests and a legal battle with the city’s police department thrust the company into reckoning with racial bias on a larger corporate scale. The company closed more than 8,000 of its U.S. stores the following month for an afternoon of anti-bias training.
Christina Chang, a diversity and equity consultant in Seattle, said she often uses that case in her anti-bias workshops with predominantly white groups as an example of how institutionalized racism shows up in day-to-day life.
“In the midst of everything of that’s happened, they are still so flat-footed,” she said. “How is that possible? The reason it’s possible is that at the end of the day, you still don’t have diversity at the top. You still don’t have people of color with different experiences who will sit down with them and say, ‘Hey that’s not cool.'”
Simon said he thinks that the company’s quick reversal is a case study for how the broader American public has mostly changed its attitude toward the Black Lives Matter movement.
Responses to the company’s quick reversal has been nuanced, ranging from applause and returning customers, to those who have now pledged to buy their coffee elsewhere rather than be served by a barista in a Black Lives Matter shirt, to racial justice activists who feel the company’s response was disingenuous and too little, too late.
“In this moment, when everybody is waking up, and for Starbucks to do this . . . it’s unforgivable,” Chang said. “No, we do not stop boycotting Starbucks. . . . They have struck out.”
Starbucks suffered a $3 billion hit to revenue since the pandemic began sweeping across the United States in March, forcing the company to temporarily shutter half of its 8,000 company-owned U.S. stores for nearly two months.
Glick said that during that time, Starbucks sent employees surveys to fill out about how their communities were affect ed by the pandemic and what local organizations were working to address those needs, which resulted in company donations. She said she’s expecting to receive a similar survey in response to racial injustice protests and the Black Lives Matter movement.
But Chang isn’t hopeful that the company culture will change until its board, leadership and store management reflects the racial and gender diversity of the country.
“The only way it’s every going to change is if we actually have representation at the top,” she said. “Not tokenism, not, ‘Oh we hired a chief diversity officer’ so we’re done.”
PTT CEO Auttapol Rerkpiboon
SootinClaimon.Com 