22 feel-good movies and TV shows you can watch with the whole family #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

22 feel-good movies and TV shows you can watch with the whole family (nationthailand.com)

22 feel-good movies and TV shows you can watch with the whole family

InternationalNov 27. 2020Madison Reyes as Julie in Netflix's Madison Reyes as Julie in Netflix’s “Julie and the Phantoms.” MUST CREDIT: Eike Schroter/Netflix 

By The Washington Post · Bethonie Butler · ENTERTAINMENT, FILM, TV

The holidays will feel a bit different this year, but some traditions cannot be thwarted – like our annual viewing of “It’s a Wonderful Life.” Though your gatherings might be smaller than usual, there are a ton of family-friendly viewing options on streaming and a growing number of ways to make them a virtual group experience. We’ve rounded up some of our favorite kid-friendly TV and film picks below.

– “A Christmas Story” (1983)

Consider this a triple dog dare. (Streams on Hulu Plus Live TV/TBS)

– “Jingle Jangle: A Christmas Journey” (2020)

A toymaker who lost everything when his apprentice betrayed him is inspired by his granddaughter to return to the trade in this fantastical musical. It boasts an all-star cast – Forest Whitaker, Keegan-Michael Key, Anika Noni Rose, Hugh Bonneville and Phylicia Rashad – to boot. (Streams on Netflix)

– “Hair Love” (2019)

Matthew A. Cherry’s Oscar-winning short, about a little girl who helps her dad figure out how to do her hair, clocks in at just under seven minutes but will stay with you for much longer than that – especially if you’ve ever struggled to love your own hair. (Streams on YouTube)

– “Ratatouille” (2007)

We wouldn’t let Remy, the rat chef at the center of this Oscar-winning animated film, cook our Thanksgiving dinner, but we’ll gladly take his culinary tips while we wait for the musical conceived by TikTok users to materialize. (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “Coco” (2017)

This tender and vivid Pixar/Disney film is rooted in the Mexican tradition of Día de los Muertos, the annual time when families honor their departed loved ones, so it’s a great preamble to discussing grief with younger kids (or processing it at any age). The story revolves around a young aspiring musician who – in a quest to reverse his family’s long-standing rule against music – finds himself among his ancestors in the Land of the Dead. (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” (2008)

Force-sensitive families will enjoy this animated “Star Wars” series, which takes place between Episodes II and III of the Star Wars prequel saga and lets an intriguing heroine shine. (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “The NeverEnding Story” (1984)

This is familiar territory for ’80s kids, but why not let the younger generations see what movie magic looked like in the pre-CGI days? (Streams on HBO Max)

– “Paddington 2” (2017)

The marmalade-loving bear has a run-in with the law in this fun sequel, which features one of Hugh Grant’s finest performances as villain Phoenix Buchanan. The first film isn’t bad either. (Streams on Hulu Plus Live TV/TBS)

– “The Not-Too-Late Show with Elmo” (2020)

The lovable Sesame Street resident interviews celebrities and hosts musical guests in a typical but truncated late-night format: Each episode is just 15 minutes. (Streams on HBO Max)

– “Molly of Denali” (2019)

This animated PBS Kids show revolves around a young Alaska Native girl. The series won a Peabody Award this year for “helping to shift the ways that the next generation will think about Indigenous people and for giving native media-makers a central role in shaping their own representation.” (Streams on PBS Kids)

– “PBS Kids Talk About: Race & Racism” (2020)

This PBS special tackles a tough and timely subject through conversations with real kids and their parents, along with some good example-setting from fan-favorite characters including Arthur and Daniel Tiger. The broadcaster also offers some helpful resources for starting your own conversations at home. (Streams on PBS and YouTube)

– “Izzy’s Koala World” (2020)

Animal lovers of all ages will get into this docuseries following tween “Koala Whisperer” Izzy Bee, who takes care of cuddly marsupials with some help from her mother, a wildlife veterinarian, on Australia’s Magnetic Island. (Streams on Netflix)

– “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” (2018)

Miles Morales goes from Brooklyn teenager to superhero in this Oscar-winning animated film featuring an ensemble cast of voices (Shameik Moore, Hailee Steinfeld and Mahershala Ali among them) and, for what it’s worth, a song that toddlers seem to love. (Streams on Netflix)

– “Home Alone” (1990)

Is it even the holiday season if you don’t watch Macaulay Culkin (and Catherine O’Hara!) in this blockbuster and its 1992 sequel? (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving” (1973)

The Peanuts gang has an eventful Thanksgiving feast in this holiday classic. (Streams on Apple TV Plus)

– “Julie and the Phantoms” (2020)

A teenager grieving the loss of her mom starts a band with three ghosts in this Netflix dramedy, which is far less morbid than it sounds – and perfect for musically inclined tweens/teens. (Streams on Netflix)

– “The Baby-Sitters Club” (2020)

Ann M. Martin’s treasured teen series gets a decidedly Gen Z update, featuring several charismatic new talents. (Streams on Netflix)

– “Toy Story 4” (2019)

Andy’s toys are back for another beautiful and emotional adventure in this Oscar winner. (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “Hamilton” (2020)

Lin-Manuel Miranda cut some coarse language out of his Tony-winning musical so even the kids could learn about the ill-fated Founding Father and his American Dream. (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “Anne with an E” (2017)

This Canadian series, an adaptation of Lucy Maud Montgomery’s famed children’s novel, finds Anne of Green Gables at her pluckiest – and has a passionate fan base that bristled over the show’s cancellation earlier this year. (Streams on Netflix)

– “Black Panther” (2018)

The late Chadwick Boseman is the heart of this breathtaking and culturally significant Marvel film. (Streams on Disney Plus)

– “It’s a Wonderful Life” (1946)

Every year – but especially this one – we can benefit from the life lessons in Frank Capra’s beloved Christmas classic. (Streams on Hulu Plus Live TV/USA)

Brazil recovery gains steam with surprising jobs, budget data #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Brazil recovery gains steam with surprising jobs, budget data (nationthailand.com)

Brazil recovery gains steam with surprising jobs, budget data

InternationalNov 27. 2020

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Martha Beck · BUSINESS, WORLD, US-GLOBAL-MARKETS, THE-AMERICAS

Brazil surprised analysts with stronger-than-expected employment and budget numbers for October, a sign that the economic recovery seen in the past few months is gaining speed in the beginning of the fourth quarter.

The country created a record 394,989 formal job positions last month, nearly twice as much as expected by economists in a Bloomberg survey. Economy Minister Paulo Guedes celebrated the result, saying the country could finish 2020 with no job losses despite the coronavirus pandemic.

“This only shows that the economy is bouncing back in V shape,” Guedes told reporters after the numbers were released.

Meanwhile, the Treasury reported a primary deficit of only 3.6 billion reais ($680 million) for October, way lower than the 20 billion reais expected by analysts and following a large gap of 76.2 billion reais in September.

The budget surprise came on the heels of an economic recovery that has boosted tax collection at the same time as the government reduced cash handouts given during the pandemic. Companies that benefited from tax exemptions in the past few months also resumed paying them in October.

“The economic recovery played an important role in October’s result,” Treasury Secretary Bruno Funchal said at a news conference following the release of the data.

Latin America’s largest economy has started recovering in the third quarter, with the central bank’s economic activity index, considered a proxy for GDP, rising 9.47% from the previous three months. Yet the government is far from achieving a comfortable fiscal position — its 2020 budget deficit is estimated at 844 billion reais, or 11.7% of gross domestic product.

Mexico’s feminists continue occupation in calling for an end to violence #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Mexico’s feminists continue occupation in calling for an end to violence (nationthailand.com)

Mexico’s feminists continue occupation in calling for an end to violence

InternationalNov 27. 2020Feminist activists and artists dance outside the Mexican human rights office, which for two months has been run as a shelter for women and children. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Marissa LangFeminist activists and artists dance outside the Mexican human rights office, which for two months has been run as a shelter for women and children. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Marissa Lang 

By The Washington Post · Marissa J. Lang · WORLD, THE-AMERICAS

MEXICO CITY – They’re groped on the train and abused at home. Girls are assaulted at school, women at work. They’re killed in big cities and small villages.

Doc, a member of feminist group Bloque Negro, is among the activists who have occupied the human rights office. She is seen in the courtyard of the Spanish colonial building in front of historic paintings the activists have defaced. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Marissa Lang

Doc, a member of feminist group Bloque Negro, is among the activists who have occupied the human rights office. She is seen in the courtyard of the Spanish colonial building in front of historic paintings the activists have defaced. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Marissa Lang

In 2020, on pace to become the deadliest year for women in Mexico on record, activists say there is no safe place left for women here.

So they have made one. They kicked the government workers out of the federal Human Rights Commission building in Mexico City. They covered the walls with the names of rape victims and hung posters with the faces of the dead. Then they invited women and children to shelter.

“In here, you realize that you’re not really alone, that we have all suffered some kind of gender violence and nobody has taken care of us – not the state, not the police,” said Cali, a 26-year-old member of the group Bloque Negro, who like others spoke on the condition that her full name not be used for fear of reprisal. “So, it makes you feel safe to know that in here we can take care of ourselves.”

The occupation of the stately marble building in Mexico City’s central historic district, which began in September, is one of the most extreme acts of a feminist movement that has grown more aggressive amid the intensifying violence and what its members say is official inaction.

Last year, authorities here reported a record 3,142 femicides – the killing of girls and women for their gender. Activists say an undercurrent of machismo that runs through every part of Mexican society – families, communities, the government – is as much to blame as the perpetrators who kill, on average, nearly 10 females a day.

Elected leaders “say that they don’t know why we are angry, they say that everything is fine in the country,” said Doc, a 21-year-old who helps treat injured protesters. “But the situation is abysmal.”

Protests to fight the physical and sexual violence have overtaken cities across the country. None of the activists’ demands – including police training, a public review of government actions to stop the violence and a guarantee of the protesters’ safety – have been met.

The shelter has been a safe harbor for women fleeing violent homes, abusive relationships, sexual assault, threats or the fear of being female in a country where researchers say femicides have grown by 130 percent in the past five years.

President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has spoken against the violence. But he has also condemned the vandalism and violence at the feminists’ demonstrations. Protesters have dumped paint on statues, vandalized monuments, shattered windows and set fires.

López Obrador,a populist who rode a wave of dramatic demonstrations to prominence himself, has suggested the activists are protesting the “wrong way.”

“Without a doubt the feminist movement deserves all our respect, but I do not agree with violence,” he told reporters in September. “That we all achieve peace and tranquility, that is an objective that we have. We are working toward that.”

The activists say the vandalism isn’t a byproduct of their protests – it’s a tactic.

“For years, they protested peacefully, going to the Monument (to Independence) with photos and candles, and nobody paid any attention,” said a 22-year-old university student at the shelter who wore a black hood and mask.”It was not until private property began to be destroyed that the country turned to look.”

Yesenia Zamudio, whose 19-year-old daughter was found dead after being thrown from a fifth-floor window in Mexico City in 2016, is a frequent protester around the capital.

“I have every right to burn and break,” she told a crowd in a February.”I’m not going to ask anyone for permission, because I am breaking for my daughter.”

The approach carries risk. Protesters gathered in Cancún after the body of 20-year-old Bianca “Alexis” Lorenzana Alvarado was found dismembered this month. When they tore down plywood boards blocking the entrance and windows to the state attorney general’s office, police opened fire. Two journalists and several demonstrators reportedly were wounded.

A 2020 government survey found that nearly 80 percent of Mexican women don’t feel safe in their own country. Ten percent of criminal cases here result in prison sentences; when the victims are women, the percentage is lower. Human rights groups estimate that only about 2 percent of accused rapists in Mexico are ever jailed.

The World Health Organization has reported that approximately half of all women in Mexico will experience sexual or intimate-partner violence during their lifetimes. But many suffer several attacks.

Yaderi, a 36-year-old university student and retail worker who lives in Mexico state, said she has been sexually assaulted six times, beginning at age 7 and most recently six years ago. But it wasn’t until she had a daughter, she said, that she felt compelled to join the movement.

Two years ago, she said, the child came home from preschool crying. She told her mother a man had touched her sexually.

“I teach my children that their body is theirs, but we live in a country where that is not true – not for children, not for women,” she said. “Enough.”

Her last name is being withheld to protect her daughter’s identity.

Yaderi joined Ni Una Menos, a grass-roots movement across Latin America to fight violence against women and push for more effective laws and harsher punishments.

“All these girls know somebody that has been killed or disappeared, and they have watched the government do nothing about it,” said Angélica Nadurille of the Equity and Gender Collective. “They’re angry. And they are right to be – the government is part of the problem because they have closed their eyes to the problems that exist, and I think that is because of the personal belief of the president.”

López Obrador has said feminist groups have been infiltrated by his political rivals and co-opted to undermine his administration.

He has expressed outrage over violence against women, but he has also slashed funding to the National Institute of Women amid coronavirus-related austerity measures and threatened to withdraw government funding from shelters operated by nonprofit organizations – suggesting instead that women fleeing abuse could be given a direct cash payment.

“When the pandemic started, he said violence against women should be less because the home is a very safe place to be,” Nadurille said. “And when we said this is not true, that it will actually make things worse, he said no, that’s not possible, because the family is a happy place.”

López Obrador’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Dozens of families have sought shelter at the human rights office. They sleep in converted offices and live off donated food and clothing.

Children race up and down hallways as mothers and volunteers prep meals in a communal kitchen and sort donations of clothes, art supplies and toiletries. Men are not allowed inside the building.

Those who have sought shelter here are looked after by a rotating cast of young women in black balaclavas – the Bloque Negro, or the Black Bloc.

Bloque Negro activists stand guard with baseball bats, hockey sticks and pipes. Atop a mini-fridge sit neat rows of ready-made molotov cocktails, rags hanging from the tops of old beer and tequila bottles.

It makes women like Erika, 42, and her 10-year-old daughter feel safe.

Erika, a working-class mother of three, was among the small group of women who took over the offices in early September. Today, she’s one of the handful that remain. Infighting has driven wedges in the movement and led some women to leave.

Zamudio has denounced the work of Bloque Negro at the shelter. In occupying the building, she said, they have lost sight of the movement’s greater purpose: justice.

But for Erika, the two go hand in hand.

“I took this building because in response to my complaint, I was forced to leave my home, I was stripped of my home … and the authorities did not protect me,” she said. “We are no longer fighting against the abuser, the rapist, but instead we are fighting this government, this system, these authorities.”

A housekeeper and doll maker, she and her youngest daughter moved into the shelter after months of homelessness. The two no longer felt safe in their own home, Erika said, after the child, then 7, said she was sexually assaulted by a family member.

For two years, Erika said, she begged police and prosecutors to do more to resolve her daughter’s case. Erika was sexually assaulted herself when she was 10, she said. But when she told her mother, her family did nothing to help her.

“How many women put aside their complaint because they prefer to work and eat than to lose their job, their life, like me?” she said. “I have lost three years of our lives, my daughter’s and mine, fighting for this man to pay and not do the same to other women. That is why we fight: to stop this from repeating.”

Her daughter can’t imagine a future that doesn’t involve living at the shelter, surrounded by women. An energetic child, she bounces as she talks and runs fast through the open courtyard as her dark hair trails behind her.

She likes that men aren’t allowed in, she said, and that the women are free to do and say what they like. She likes the wall paintings and the black hoods. She helped paint over an oil portrait of Francisco Madero, the tragic revolutionary hero. She gave him bright red lipstick; others filled in green eye shadow and purple hair.

“I’m going to stay here for my whole life,” she said.

Erika said the shelter has changed the girl’s life.

“She can sleep without worrying that something is going to happen to her,” she said. “She can enjoy the entire building without worrying that something is going to happen to her. I can let her run and play without worrying that something is going to happen to her.”

Russia’s vaccine volunteers swap stories – and antibody readings – as amateur researchers #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Russia’s vaccine volunteers swap stories – and antibody readings – as amateur researchers (nationthailand.com)

Russia’s vaccine volunteers swap stories – and antibody readings – as amateur researchers

InternationalNov 27. 2020

By The Washington Post · Robyn Dixon · WORLD, HEALTH, EUROPE, HEALTH-FEATURES

MOSCOW – Their friends and relatives called them “test bunnies” and warned they risked horrible health problems from Russia’s entry into the vaccine race.

But a group of Russians, who dived in early as volunteers in trials of Russia’s Sputnik V, has emerged as amateur researchers before the official results of full Phase III data, still months away even though Russian officials on Tuesday asserted the vaccine was 95 percent effective.

Instead, they have set themselves in an online community – and, like members of a nerdy high school science team, they are doing their own explorations and analyses.

Nearly 1,500 people swap messages, answer questions and share antibody results and other health updates in an unofficial Telegram group that calls itselfCovid Vaccine Trial Volunteers.

It’s one of the quirkiest corners in the global race for a vaccine, with Sputnik V among other formulas from labs in the United States, China and Europe.

The online group welcomes newcomers, desperate to get into the vaccine trial, sending links to the best places for swift acceptance. They commiserate with disappointed participants who seem to have gotten the trial placebo shots. They plot graphs of results and symptoms and sling around technical information about antibodies and T-cells.

A few are experts, with a background in biochemistry or data research, but most are ordinary folk as Russia’s new cases reaching daily records of around 24,000 a day.

Russia’s government has not commented publicly on the web salon. But the chatter should seem familiar. Like Russian officials, almost all of posts in the Telegram group believe Sputnik V is effective.

“The satellite, damn, flies and beeps!” posted Dmitry Kulish, convinced in the power of the vaccine named after Russia’s first Cold War satellite.

Kulish, a biochemist and professor at the Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, a private research institute in Moscow, took part in the trial because it was the only way to get the vaccine.

“Long story short: I got two shots and two days ago I got my antibody level and it’s really high so I am so happy about it,” he said in an interview.

According to Russian investigative website Proyekt, members of Russia’s elite, including tycoons and officials, were lining up to be secretly given Sputnik V shots even before it was registered in August. Russian officials have denied elite Russians got early insider access.

Many other Russians, however, remain skeptical of vaccination in general: 59 percent of Russians would not take covid-19 jabs, according to October polling by the Levada Center. The polling does not reflect the reasons for skepticism. But, as in Europe, the United States and elsewhere, the anti-vaccine lobby has taken hold in Russia in some quarters – as have conspiracy theories suggesting that covid-19 does not exist.

“As for the efficacy of the Russian vaccine or any other vaccine, I don’t think anyone knows. Only time will tell,” said trial volunteerAlexander Samsonov, 39, a member of the Telegram group who claimed that he got a strong antibody boost based on the Italian firm Diasorin’s Liaisontest, taken at a Moscow testing center.

Samsonov quit his public-relations job in the summer because his boss insisted that employees return to office-based work, where few bothered with protection measures like masks and gloves.

He eschewed his usual round of concerts, walks in the park, exhibitions and coffee-shop meetings with journalists. He stayed home for month after month, constantly glued to his computer, working freelance.

“I was stressed. I stayed home all the time,” he said. “You sit down all day and you put on weight.”

Samsonov decided to join the vaccine trial after his grandmother, 92, died of covid-19 and friends contracted the virus.

“They told me terrible things. Some got diabetes. Some got blood clots. And some had problems with their lungs,” he said.

But some colleagues and friends also poked fun at Samsonov’s protection measures, including masks and gloves. When he volunteered for the trial, they said he would be sorry.

“They told me – because the vaccine has not been tested to the very end, and because the vaccination thing is political – I would have health problems,” he said. “I would never have kids and I would develop various diseases because of this vaccine.”

But he described the vaccine, even still experimental, as helping lift his mood like the curtain rising on a premiere. He found a new job in public relations.

“I feel much calmer. I feel like I can get out of self-isolation now,” he said. “I can’t live in isolation until the summer of 2021.”

As global competition heats up, Russia is targeting markets in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. President Vladimir Putin pushes the vaccine in every conversation he has with any world leader – jostling with rivals that include British-Swedish giant AstraZeneca in alliance with Oxford University, and U.S.-based Moderna and Pfizer, collaborating with Germany’s BioNTech.

Russia claims Sputnik V is 95 percent effective, similar to results reported by Pfizer and BioNTech, and Moderna.

Russia’s stance – in the words of loyal state TV anchor Dmitry Kiselyov – is to pooh-pooh the West’s vaccines as expensive and temperamental products that must be kept at very low temperatures. Sputnik V is freeze-dried and more easily stored and transported. Kiselyov compared it to one of the Soviet Union’s most famous exports.

“Sputnik V is like a Kalashnikov, simple and reliable,” he said on Vesti Nedeli television program earlier this month. “Just like any frozen product, Pfizer is likely to suffer logistical problems.”

Vladimir Rusetsky, 36 and his wife Yelena, both IT specialists, started the Telegram group to share information and were surprised to see how fast it grew.

They flew 1,670 miles from their home Omsk to Moscow – twice – to join the trial and take the two sets of shots. They were afraid of infecting their parents.

“When you have older relatives, it’s scary,” Rusetsky said.

Antibody tests after the vaccine showed their levels were high, he said.

He hopes that the group will persuade skeptics, including friends and family, to consider getting the shot when it is widely available early next year.

“My wife’s daughter, who lives in America, called us test rabbits. Now she sees that we have antibodies and her attitude has changed,” Rusetsky said. The couple still follow the rules on masks and gloves, mainly to set an example to others.

“Of course I have this feeling of relief,” he said. “Now I know my relatives will be safe. I will not pass on the disease to them and that calms me down a lot.”

Max Popov, a Canadian citizen in the Telegram vaccine community and a related Facebook group, said there was no reason to fear Russia’s vaccine. But he and his Russian wife, Natalia Khristyukova, had no antibodies after their clinical trial shots.

“Based on that I figured that both my wife and I are in the placebo group, unfortunately,” said Popov, who manufactures and installs television equipment in Russia

Rusetsky is sure he got the vaccine, not the placebo. He called it “life changing.”

“And if those people who did not want to be vaccinated look at me and change their minds and will get a vaccine,” he said, “that would just be great.”

Sex crime ringleader who blackmailed dozens of women is jailed for 40 years in South Korea #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Sex crime ringleader who blackmailed dozens of women is jailed for 40 years in South Korea (nationthailand.com)

Sex crime ringleader who blackmailed dozens of women is jailed for 40 years in South Korea

InternationalNov 27. 2020

By The Washington Post · Min Joo Kim · WORLD, COURTSLAW, ASIA-PACIFIC

SEOUL – Over nine months starting in spring 2019, Cho Ju-bin lured his victims – whom he called “slaves” – with calculated precision.

From his home in Seoul’s suburbs, the 25-year-old orchestrated one of South Korea’s most infamous sex crimes. Under an online alias as the “Doctor,” he blackmailed at least 74 young women, including minors, into sharing sexually explicit videos of themselves, then sold the footage online through a chat group on the encrypted app Telegram.

On Thursday, a court convicted Cho of organizing a crime ring and violating child protection laws, and jailed him for 40 years.

The case fueled a national outcry in South Korea over what has emerged as a major societal problem: men secretly recording sexually explicit footage of women, or blackmailing their victims into doing so, and then selling the material online.

It’s a crisis fueled by a lack of respect for women in Korean society and a culture of impunity, exemplified by weak laws against digital sex crimes and often low penalties for sex offenders.

In sentencing Cho, the Seoul Central District Court said he needed to be “isolated from society for an extended period” given the number of victims, the damage he inflicted on them and the social repercussions of the crimes.

“The defendant lured and threatened a large number of victims into producing sexually degrading videos and raised a lot of money through distributing them to many people over an extended period,” the court said. “In particular, he inflicted irreparable damage by releasing the identities of many victims.”

Cho had lured women through social media, sometimes by posting fake modeling or employment advertisements, and then conspired with workers at local government offices to obtain their personal information so he could blackmail them. He then sold access to chatrooms for up to $1,300, paid in cryptocurrency.

The scale of the operation stunned the nation. Local media said that up to 260,000 people potentially viewed the content, though police say that number includes double-counting and nonpaying members. More than 2 million people signed a petition demanding the names of everyone who viewed the content to be made public.

“At the time, I was hardly concerned about human dignity and I just used people and sex as tool for crimes,” Cho told prosecutors, according to local media reports. “Now I declare an end to my life as a devil.”

Prosecutors had sought a life sentence for Cho. Both they and Cho have a week to appeal the verdict. Cho’s attorney could not be reached for comment.

The police have detained 124 suspects in relation to the crime ring.

In Thursday’s ruling, sentences of 15 years or less were handed down to some of Cho’s accomplices. A 24-year-old man, under the alias “Donald Putin,” was convicted of stealing victims’ personal information and supplying it to Cho to threaten the women. Others sentenced on Thursday included a 16-year-old and a public servant.

The outcry has provoked an official reaction.

In March, South Korea’s Justice Ministry established a task force to address online sexual crimes, and pledged to set up prevention measures and improve support for victims. In April, South Korea’s parliament passed a law increasing penalties for illegal sexual imagery, outlawing possession and viewing of such material.

Outside the Seoul court, women’s rights activists declared the verdict “not an end, but the beginning of rooting out sexual abuse on Telegram.”

A spokeswoman for the Joint Committee for Sex Abuse on Telegram, consisting of sexual violence hotlines and nongovernmental organizations, called for proper support measures for sex abuse victims who were “left neglected.”

The impact that Cho’s crimes had on the lives of young women was underlined this week in a public letter from an unnamed victim.

“You guys were confident about impunity and tried to scare me, devour me,” she wrote. “Seeing your faces getting revealed one by one, I only then realized that my life had been completely destroyed.”

Ethiopian leader says assault on rebel bastion in Tigray ready to begin #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Ethiopian leader says assault on rebel bastion in Tigray ready to begin (nationthailand.com)

Ethiopian leader says assault on rebel bastion in Tigray ready to begin

InternationalNov 27. 2020

By The Washington Post · Paul Schemm, Danielle Paquette · WORLD, AFRICA

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed announced Thursday that the final operation to take the capital of the rebellious Tigray province could begin after a 72-hour ultimatum to surrender had expired.

Ethiopia’s military intervened in the rugged northern province after local forces there attacked an army base and made off with military equipment Nov. 3, sparking three weeks of unrest in which federal forces have taken over much of Tigray.

With communications to the province cut, it was impossible to verify whether the military operation against the regional capital of Mekele had begun. Government forces said they had surrounded the city of 500,000 with tanks from 30 miles away.

“The Ethiopian National Defense forces have now been directed to conclude the third and final phase of our rule of law operation,” said the statement from the prime minister’s office. “We call on the people of Mekele and its environs to disarm, stay at home and stay away from military targets, and take all necessary precautions.”

The government campaign is against the political party controlling the province, the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front, which once dominated the coalition that ruled the country for nearly 30 years. With the rise of Abiy, they retreated to their power base in Tigray and in recent months relations with the central government have soured dramatically.

At least 40,000 refugees have fled the fighting into neighboring Sudan, and there have been reports of hundreds of civilians massacred. Photos blazed across social media of people with bullet and machete wounds.

“It is vital that humanitarian services, as well as basic services, are provided,” said Aaron Maasho, senior adviser and spokesman for the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission in the capital, Addis Ababa.

Some advocates in the city worried soldiers advancing on Mekele would trigger indiscriminate violence.

“A bloodbath,” said one, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, fearing for their safety. Without internet access, it was unclear how many residents heard the prime minister’s warning to stay home.

The Ethiopian government has insisted its quarrel is only with the TPLF and not against the Tigrayan people and said the grace period was for the local forces to surrender.

“The last peaceful gate which had remained open for the TPLF clique to walk through has now been firmly closed as a result of TPLF’s contempt for the people of Ethiopia,” the statement added.

In messages to media outlets, the TPLF leadership has insisted that government forces have suffered several defeats. The Ethiopian government has countered by reporting surrenders among TPLF forces.

There has been widespread international concern about the campaign and calls for mediation that have been rejected by Abiy, last year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner, who has said the operation is an internal matter.

President-elect Joe Biden’s national security adviser nominee, Jake Sullivan, urged dialogue this week facilitated by the African Union.

“I’m deeply concerned about the risk of violence against civilians, including potential war crimes, in the fighting around Mekelle in Ethiopia,” he said on Twitter.

The U.N. refugee agency has warned that a “full-scale humanitarian crisis” is unfolding in Tigray, and there are fears that food and water may be running out in this province of 6 million.

As supplies precariously dwindled, aid workers said they had no way to reach people who had been forced from their homes for weeks.

Thousands – including pregnant women and those battling illness – were crossing the Sudanese border each day in search of safety, they said. Spouses have been separated. Children have lost touch with their parents.

The prime minister’s office said in a Thursday statement that it would provide essentials to the rush of displaced citizens and clear the way for humanitarian groups, adding that the government “stands to support all Ethiopians that have fled to return to their communities.”

The pledge appeared to open a new path for desperately needed assistance, said Nigel Tricks, regional director of the Norwegian Refugee Council in Nairobi.

“People have gone from having a roof over their head,” he said, “to absolutely nothing.”

Thousands of farmers march toward New Delhi to protest #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Thousands of farmers march toward New Delhi to protest (nationthailand.com)

Thousands of farmers march toward New Delhi to protest

InternationalNov 27. 2020

By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Pratik Parija · BUSINESS, WORLD, US-GLOBAL-MARKETS, ASIA-PACIFIC

Almost 300,000 farmers from various states are on their way to India’s capital to protest against new agricultural laws they say will severely hurt their incomes, according to two farm groups.

About 100 leaders representing farmers have been arrested in Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, the Samyukt Kisan Morcha and the All India Kisan Sangharsh Coordination Committee said in a joint statement Thursday. The authorities in several states are trying to stop farmers from marching toward New Delhi, they said.

“We want the three bills to be repealed in toto,” Yogendra Yadav, a member of the coordination committee told a virtual press conference Wednesday. “We don’t subscribe to the view that” they are going to boost earnings of farmers, he said.

Analysts and industry experts have said that a slew of reforms introduced by the government in September have the potential to change the face of Indian agriculture, which has been hampered by low yields and inefficient smallholdings. The new rules make it easier to sell crops in other states, while a rise in production would boost exports and farm incomes, they said.

However, farmers are worried that the new measures will eventually kill the government’s price support regime for crops and leave them at the mercy of big corporations that would control the market.

Before the new amendments, farmers in most states were restricted from selling their crops outside government-facilitated wholesale markets and faced legal hurdles in transporting harvests to other states.

Central to the reforms is an amendment to the Essential Commodities Act, a 1955 law. Earlier, when prices rose due to higher demand, the law’s price-control measures kicked in, discouraging investment to increase production.

Farmers from Punjab braced water cannons at the state’s border with Haryana as they moved toward New Delhi, the Press Trust of India reported. The Haryana Police blocked the Amritsar-Delhi highway with trucks to stop tractor-trolleys of protesting farmers, the report said.

Trump says he will leave if electoral college votes for Biden #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Trump says he will leave if electoral college votes for Biden (nationthailand.com)

Trump says he will leave if electoral college votes for Biden

InternationalNov 27. 2020President Donald Trump arrives to speak in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Jabin BotsfordPresident Donald Trump arrives to speak in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2020. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Jabin Botsford 

By The Washington Post · Josh Dawsey · NATIONAL, POLITICS

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he would leave the White House if the electoral college voted for Joe Biden next month, though he vowed to keep fighting to overturn the election he lost and said he may never concede.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/c/embed/ed3b2845-0e12-41dd-9483-f97e0fea7d5a?ptvads=block&playthrough=false

“Certainly I will, and you know that,” he said when asked if he would leave the White House if the electoral college picked Biden.

Though advisers have long said he would leave on Jan. 20, it was Trump’s first explicit commitment to vacate office if it did not go his way.

Trump said he planned to continue to make claims of fraud about the results and said, without evidence, that Biden could not have won close to 80 million votes. His legal team has been widely mocked – and has lost almost every claim in every state, as officials certify results for Biden.

“It’s going to be a very hard thing to concede,” he said of the election. Aides have privately said Trump will never concede that he lost.

Asked whether he would attend Biden’s inauguration, he demurred. “I know the answer,” he said, though he declined to provide it.

Even as most of his lawyers have quit and many campaign officials say the effort to overturn the election is going nowhere, Trump said it was going “very well.”

The president made the remarks in the diplomatic room of the White House after he spoke to soldiers across the world. The Thanksgiving session – an annual tradition for Trump – marked the first time he took questions since the election.

He planned to have dinner with his family at the White House on Thursday night and spent much of the day at his golf club in Virginia.

The president also said he planned to campaign in Georgia for two Republicans in Senate run-offs set for January. The races are key to the party keeping the majority. Trump said he may go as soon as Saturday, though a White House spokesman later said he meant next Saturday.

Republicans close to Trump have said he was largely uninterested in the run-offs until his Thursday appearance. He railed against Georgia officials, who he believes have not intervened enough as the state has counted ballots and certified results for Biden.

Trump’s continued rhetoric has worried Republicans working on the race, who fear his campaign against the election could discourage some supporters from voting.

“I’m very worried about that,” Trump said, when asked if Georgia’s senate run-off elections would be legitimate.

“You have a fraudulent system,” he said he told Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. He said his supporters feared the race was illegitimate.

Trump continued to falsely claim that there had been widespread voter fraud in his election, without offering proof. And he again falsely said Republican poll watchers were not allowed to observe in Pennsylvania, though his lawyers have said in court that some were allowed to observe.

Aides say Trump has begun discussing a 2024 presidential bid, but he said on Thursday he was still focused on 2020.

“I don’t think it’s right he’s trying to pick a cabinet,” Trump said of Biden. Trump had blocked a presidential transition for several weeks but relented this week and allowed his team to go forward.

Trump also glancingly addressed the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed more than 250,000 in the United States, though mainly to brag. “The vaccines – and by the way, don’t let Joe Biden take credit for the vaccine… Don’t let him take credit for the vaccines, because the vaccines were me,” he said.

Trump’s imprint on Supreme Court shows conservative effect in key coronavirus ruling #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Trump’s imprint on Supreme Court shows conservative effect in key coronavirus ruling (nationthailand.com)

Trump’s imprint on Supreme Court shows conservative effect in key coronavirus ruling

InternationalNov 27. 2020Justice Neil Gorsuch, left, is accompanied by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. following his investiture ceremony at the Supreme Court in June 2017. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Ricky CariotiJustice Neil Gorsuch, left, is accompanied by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. following his investiture ceremony at the Supreme Court in June 2017. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Ricky Carioti 

By The Washington Post · Robert Barnes · NATIONAL, HEALTH, POLITICS, COURTSLAW, RELIGION

The Supreme Court’s new conservative majority showed its muscle on Thanksgiving Eve, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett playing a key role in reversing the court’s past deference to local officials when weighing pandemic-related restrictions on religious organizations.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Demetrius Freeman

Justice Amy Coney Barrett. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Demetrius Freeman

All three of President Donald Trump’s nominees to the court were in the 5-to-4 majority that blocked New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s restrictions on houses of worship in temporary hot spots where the coronavirus is raging.

The court’s most conservative justices distanced themselves from Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first nominee, went out of his way to say that lower courts should no longer follow Roberts’s guidance of deference, calling it “mistaken from the start.”

“Even if the Constitution has taken a holiday during this pandemic, it cannot become a sabbatical,” Gorsuch wrote. Rather than applying “nonbinding and expired” guidance from Roberts in an earlier case from California, Gorsuch said, “courts must resume applying the Free Exercise Clause.”

“Today, a majority of the court makes this plain.”

The halt of Cuomo’s orders, which had been allowed to remain in place by lower courts, was the first evidence that Roberts may no longer play the pivotal role he has occupied over the past couple of years. He has been at the center of the court, with four members of the court consistently more conservative than him, and four more liberal.

Barrett’s replacement of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg means there are now five members of the court – a majority – more willing to move the court quickly in a more conservative direction.

And pandemic-related restrictions on worship services have drawn the ire of the conservatives for months.

They were previously outvoted when Ginsburg was alive, as she and the other liberals joined with Roberts to leave in place restrictions in California and Nevada that imposed limits on in-person services at houses of worship.

In the cases involved in the court’s midnight order Wednesday, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Jewish organizations led by Agudath Israel challenged Cuomo’s system of imposing drastic restrictions on certain neighborhoods when coronavirus cases spike.

Under Cuomo’s plan, in areas designated “red zones,” where the virus risk is highest, worship services are capped at 10 people. At the next level, “orange zones,” there is an attendance cap of 25. The size of the facility does not factor in to the capacity limit.

The diocese said in its petition that the plan subjects “houses of worship alone” to “onerous fixed-capacity caps while permitting a host of secular businesses to remain open in ‘red’ and ‘orange’ zones without any restrictions whatsoever.”

And the Jewish organizations noted Cuomo, a Democrat, had specifically mentioned outbreaks in Orthodox Jewish neighborhood when imposing the restrictions. “This court should not permit such remarkable scapegoating of a religious minority to stand,” the organizations said in court documents.

Cuomo attributed the court’s order to its more conservative majority. “I think that Supreme Court ruling on the religious gatherings is more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else,” Cuomo told reporters. “It’s irrelevant from a practical impact because the zone that they were talking about has already been moved. It expired last week. I think this was really just an opportunity for the court to express its philosophy and politics.”

Technically, the court’s order blocks Cuomo’s restrictions from being reimposed while legal challenges continue. But the court’s unsigned opinion would appear to make the ultimate outcome clear.

“Even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten,” the opinion said. “The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty.”

The opinion was endorsed by Barrett, Gorsuch and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito Jr. and Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s second appointment to the court. It was mild compared with recent comments from Alito and the Gorsuch opinion, which no other justices joined.

Alito, who did not write a separate opinion, recently told the conservative legal organization the Federalist Society that the pandemic “has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty.”

“It pains me to say this, but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right,” Alito said.

President Donald Trump speaks gestures toward Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the 2019 State of the Union. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Melina Mara

President Donald Trump speaks gestures toward Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the 2019 State of the Union. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Melina Mara

But Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for fellow liberals Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, said that it was a strange time for the court to be offering relief.

“The number of new confirmed cases per day is now higher than it has ever been,” Breyer wrote, and New York has accounted for 26,000 of the more than 250,000 deaths nationwide. According to The Washington Post, there have been more than 34,000 coronavirus fatalities in New York.

“The nature of the epidemic, the spikes, the uncertainties, and the need for quick action, taken together, mean that the State has countervailing arguments based upon health, safety, and administrative considerations that must be balanced against the applicants’ First Amendment challenges,” Breyer wrote.

Sotomayor was more pointed in a separate opinion joined by Kagan: “Justices of this court play a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials about the environments in which a contagious virus, now infecting a million Americans each week, spreads most easily.”

Roberts noted in his opinion that the restrictions might be unduly restrictive but said Cuomo has already eased them, essentially giving the churches and synagogues the relief they had requested.

“The Governor might reinstate the restrictions. But he also might not,” the chief justice wrote. “And it is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is necessary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic.”

Gorsuch disagreed.

“It is time – past time – to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques,” he wrote.

Gorsuch’s solo opinion was at times scathing and sarcastic. He noted that Cuomo had designated, among others, hardware stores, acupuncturists, liquor stores and bicycle repair shops as essential businesses not subject to the most strict limits.

“So, at least according to the governor, it may be unsafe to go to church, but it is always fine to pick up another bottle of wine, shop for a new bike, or spend the afternoon exploring your distal points and meridians,” Gorsuch wrote. “Who knew public health would so perfectly align with secular convenience?”

Gorsuch criticized Roberts for relying on one of the court’s 1905 precedents for his position that the court should defer to local officials during health crises.

The chief justice seemed taken aback. He said his earlier opinion in the California case only asserted that the Constitution chiefly leaves such decisions to local officials.

That, he wrote, “should be uncontroversial, and the (Gorsuch) concurrence must reach beyond the words themselves to find the target it is looking for.”

He also defended the liberal justices from Gorsuch’s tough words, even though Roberts did not join their dissents.

“I do not regard my dissenting colleagues as ‘cutting the Constitution loose during a pandemic,’ yielding to ‘a particular judicial impulse to stay out of the way in times of crisis,’ or ‘shelter(ing) in place when the Constitution is under attack,’ ” Roberts wrote, quoting Gorsuch’s opinion.

“They simply view the matter differently after careful study and analysis reflecting their best efforts to fulfill their responsibility under the Constitution.”

Conservative religious organizations praised the court’s action.

“Governor Cuomo should have known that openly targeting Jews for a special covid crackdown was never going to be constitutional,” said Eric Rassbach, vice president and senior counsel at the Becket Fund, which represented Agudath Israel. Covid-19 is the disease caused by the coronavirus. “The Supreme Court was right to step in and allow Jews and Catholics to worship as they have for centuries.”

But Donna Lieberman, executive director of the Liberties New York Civil Union, said the court’s action was dangerous.

“New York’s temporary restrictions on indoor gatherings do not discriminate against houses of worship, and, in fact, treat them better than comparable non-religious gatherings,” Lieberman said in a statement. “The Supreme Court’s decision will unfortunately undermine New York’s efforts to curb the pandemic.”

The cases are Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo and Agudath Israel v. Cuomo.

Trump’s baseless election fraud claims in Georgia turn Senate runoffs into a ‘high-wire act’ for Republicans #SootinClaimon.Com

#SootinClaimon.Com : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation.

Trump’s baseless election fraud claims in Georgia turn Senate runoffs into a ‘high-wire act’ for Republicans (nationthailand.com)

Trump’s baseless election fraud claims in Georgia turn Senate runoffs into a ‘high-wire act’ for Republicans

InternationalNov 27. 2020Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., in Atlanta on Election Night. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Melina MaraSen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., in Atlanta on Election Night. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Melina Mara 

By The Washington Post · Cleve R. Wootson Jr., Amy Gardner · NATIONAL, POLITICS

GRIFFIN, Ga. – Sen. David Perdue was encouraging a crowd at a gun club south of Atlanta to support him and fellow Republican Kelly Loeffler in their bid for Georgia’s Senate seats, which he called the only thing standing between America and “a radical socialist agenda.”

But five minutes into the senator’s speech, a man interrupted.

“What are you doing to help Donald Trump and this fraud case?” the man screamed, as one woman said “Amen” and the crowd applauded. “What are you doing to stop what’s been going on here and this election fraud?”

The Republican candidates in Georgia’s dual Senate runoff campaign are navigating a highly unusual political labyrinth – caught in the middle of an intraparty war that has erupted since President Trump narrowly lost the state to President-elect Joe Biden and has turned his fire on the Republican leadership there.

The infighting now threatens to turn off the very Republican voters Perdue and Loeffler need to stave off challenges from their Democratic rivals, Jon Ossoff and the Rev. Raphael Warnock.

Trump and his allies have repeatedly, and falsely, accused Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and Gov. Brian Kemp, both Republicans, of presiding over a fraudulent election. Trump has pushed the baseless claim that the Dominion Voting Systems machines used in Georgia were rigged as part of a global conspiracy, and Perdue and Loeffler have called for Raffensperger’s resignation.

But therein lies the conundrum: Perdue and Loeffler are traveling the state pleading with Republican voters to turn out on Jan. 5 – effectively asking Trump supporters to put their faith in the same voting system their president claims was manipulated to engineer his defeat.

“What did (Trump) get, 73 million votes? Those folks don’t just disappear. Trump’s blessing goes far here,” said the Rev. Benny Tate, of Rock Springs Church, who has been traveling with Perdue on campaign stops and prayed before Monday’s event. “There are folks that didn’t come out to vote necessarily Republican, they came out to vote for Donald Trump. I think it’s imperative that (Perdue and Loeffler) do get the Trump voters back. I think it remains to be seen whether they actually come back.”

Loeffler and Perdue are walking what one Republican strategist called “a high-wire act right now, to figure out exactly where the candidates should be relative to the president.”

Complicating the senators’ pitch to voters is the call by some Trump advocates for voters to protest the voting system in ways that some GOP strategists fear will merely result in effective votes for the Democrats.

One prominent Trump ally, Atlanta attorney Lin Wood, who unsuccessfully sued Georgia election officials to stop the certification of the vote, has urged Republican voters not to vote in elections with Dominion machines.

Wood has attacked Perdue and Loeffler for not doing enough to help, and told his 631,000 Twitter followers last weekend that if the senators don’t step up their support, he would take a pass on Jan. 5.

“If not fixed, I will NOT vote in GA runoff,” he tweeted.

Asked whether his efforts would depress GOP turnout, Wood told The Washington Post via email that the Dominion machines “have no integrity” and insisted that “Georgia can vote by written ballot if necessary in January.”

Raffensperger, among the most outspoken who have said such talk will hurt Loeffler’s and Perdue’s chances, expressed exasperation at Wood’s comments. A statewide audit of the presidential result, in which every ballot was recounted by hand, disproved the claims about the voting machines.

“I really don’t know what he’s thinking,” Raffensperger said in an interview. “If the people don’t use the machines then I guess they vote absentee and then their ballot will be scanned on a Dominion machine,” he said. “People need to get a grip on reality.”

Nonetheless, support for the claims being spread by Trump and his supporters is clearly strong in the state’s GOP base.

Hundreds of people attended “Stop the Steal” protests outside the Georgia Capitol and governor’s mansion on Saturday.

Four senators have called for a special legislative session to address voting issues before the runoff.

And the state Republican chairman, David Shafer, has echoed questions about the state’s voting system. He signed a letter along with the state party executive committee demanding fresh scrutiny of signature verification on mail-in ballots.

“We have grave concerns as to whether or not proper verification took place,” the letter said.

No evidence has surfaced that ballots with nonmatching signatures were counted.

The Perdue and Loeffler campaigns did not respond to requests for comment.

Perdue has privately pointed to the challenges of campaigning in the Trump era, and the potential benefit of running now without the president on the ticket.

Addressing donors on a conference call earlier this month, Perdue spoke of an “anti-Trump vote in Georgia” and said the runoff is about getting “enough conservative Republicans out to vote” who might have opposed the president’s re-election. Details of the call were shared with The Post by a person who provided a precise account of the discussion.

“I’m talking about people that may have voted for Biden but now may come back and vote for us because there was an anti-Trump vote in Georgia,” Perdue said. “And we think some of those people, particularly in the suburbs, may come back to us. And I’m hopeful of that.”

The odd political dynamics have come across in part through the absence of some potential campaign-trail headliners.

Trump has tweeted in favor of Loeffler and Perdue, but he has not committed to showing up on the campaign trail, though Vice President Mike Pence did lead a rally.

Kemp, the governor, has also avoided making any runoff campaign appearances on behalf of his state’s two Republican senators. The governor has been walking a line between supporting the integrity of the election result – he signed the certification on Friday of the presidential race votes – and agreeing that improvements can be made to signature verification and voter-identification rules. Kemp did not respond to a request for comment.

Republican strategists say they hope that some of tensions will fade in the weeks before the runoff, giving the party time to air enough attacks to tarnish the Democrats. They say Georgia remains a conservative state with a history of runoff campaigns going the GOP’s way. And the absence of Trump on the ballot could help win back suburban voters who rejected his style but still want to support conservatives.

One person who has been helpful for the two Senate candidates is Trump’s elder son, Don Jr., who tweeted that Georgians should “IGNORE” calls to boycott the runoffs.

“We’re not as divided as you think,” said one Republican strategist involved in the race.

Still, many Republicans remain concerned that the public hostility within the party – as well as efforts to foment distrust of voting – pose serious threats to Loeffler and Perdue.

And those tensions do not appear to be going away. Trump, for his part, has continued to push as recently as Wednesday the unfounded claims about Georgia’s voting machines.

Raffensperger hasn’t shied away from the divisions, either. His tenor hardened after Loeffler and Perdue called for his resignation – and after death threats began filtering in through social media to him and his wife.

Now, he makes no secret of his disdain for the unfounded attacks on him.

“If Republicans don’t start condemning this stuff, then I think they’re really complicit in it,” Raffensperger said in the interview. “It’s time to stand up and be counted. Are you going to stand for righteousness? Are you going to stand for integrity? Or are you going to stand for the wild mob? You wanted to condemn the wild mob when it was on the left side. What are you going to do when it’s on our side?”