French truckers, airports, landlords fret over new climate law
InternationalMar 30. 2021The law will supplement Macron’s policies that are supporting electric cars. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Cyril Marcilhacy
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Francois de Beaupuy
French trucking companies, airports and landlords are among those that have most to lose as Parliament starts discussing a law that cracks down on carbon emissions and pollution tied to travel, manufacturing, farming and housing.
From Monday, the French parliament’s Lower House starts debating a bill that includes 69 articles with measures such as the end of some domestic flights, new taxes on trucking, and a ban on renting badly insulated homes. It also includes stronger sanctions for pollution of soil, air and water.
The Climate and Resilience bill is based on proposals of an assembly of 150 randomly picked citizens created by President Emmanuel Macron. Coming a year ahead of next year’s presidential election, it’s a response to the Yellow Vest movement which, almost three years ago, violently rejected Macron’s push for higher environmental taxes on gasoline and diesel.
The law will supplement Macron’s policies that are supporting electric cars and squeezing fossil fuels from housing and manufacturing as voters are increasingly worried about climate change. While the citizens’ assembly and the Green party say the bill isn’t going far enough to reduce France’s emissions, businesses fear the legislation will add red tape and leave them at a disadvantage to European rivals.
The government said it will help road-freight companies switch to cleaner vehicles as the law foresees a progressive elimination of a tax break on diesel for truckers from 2023. However, electric or hydrogen lorries won’t be credible options for years, truckers lobbies say.
“It’s not by trying to tax French companies that there will be a shift to other transport means,” said Florence Berthelot, general delegate of FNTR, a French truckers federation. “There will still be as many trucks tomorrow, only that they won’t be French anymore.”
The planned legislation is also angering airport operators as it will ban domestic flights when there’s a train alternative of less than 2 1/2 hours, except for a limited number of connections. The bill will also force airlines to compensate emissions for all domestic flights from 2024 by purchasing carbon credits.
The ban, which will reduce flights from Paris to Bordeaux, Lyon and Nantes that carried almost a million passengers a year before the coronavirus pandemic, is “a tough blow to the attractiveness of territories” affected by the measure, Thomas Juin, president of the Union of French Airports, said last month. “Shrinking air transport in a single country is an illusion.”
Another controversial measure of the Climate and Resilience bill is a ban on renting badly insulated housing from 2028 that would apply to 4.8 million homes, even as the government is working on measures to help fund renovation works.
“This is a key dent to a fundamental part of property rights,” Jean-Marc Torrollion, chairman of the FNAIM federation of real-estate agents, said. Without appropriate government aid, a large proportion of 1.8 million badly-insulated homes currently rented will be removed from the market, further fueling housing tensions, he said.
While the measure may hurt homeowners, it may be a boon for companies involved in renovation and insulation works, which are already currently benefiting from government subsidies.
The Climate and Resilience bill includes other measures, such as:
– Creation of a tax on nitrogen-based fertilizers from 2024 pending failure to reach targets on related emissions
– Gradual obligation to use organic food in public and private canteens
– Ban on advertising for fossil energies, and the creation of a code of conduct to reduce advertising on polluting products
– Increased restraint on advertising screens in shop windows
– Reinforcement of environmental criteria in public procurement
– Mandatory creation of low-emission zones in cities of more than 150,000 inhabitants where most polluting cars will be banned by the end of 2024. About a third of existing vehicles may be concerned by the measure, according to Ecology Minister Barbara Pompili
– Ban on sales of cars emitting more than 95 grams of CO2 per kilometer by 2030, with limited exceptions for some professional vehicles
– Protecting farmland and forests by halving the pace of transformation of theses areas into construction areas during the coming decade
By The Washington Post · Teo Armus, Loveday Morris, Lateshia Beachum
A helicopter crash in the Alaskan wilderness killed five people, including one of Europe’s richest residents, after the chopper went down on Saturday during a backcountry heli-skiing trip.
Among the victims was Petr Kellner, 56, who was the Czech Republic’s richest person and one of the 70 richest people in the world last year, according to Forbes.
The Alaska Department of Public Safety said rescuers over the weekend recovered the bodies of Kellner and four others: Benjamin Larochaix, 50, a resident of the Czech Republic; heli-skiing guides Greg Harms, 52, and Sean McManamy, 38; and Zachary Russell, 33, who was piloting the helicopter.
A sixth person, who has not been named as of late Sunday night local time, was in serious but stable condition and being treated at a hospital in the Anchorage area. A rescue team found no other survivors.
It is not immediately clear what caused the Airbus AS350 B3 helicopter to crash. It was due back at around 6:30 p.m., local time, and was reported overdue by 8:30 p.m., National Transportation Board member Tom Chapman said in a virtual news conference Monday afternoon. A search-effort operator found wreckage about an hour after that, near Palmer, Alaska, which lies 45 miles north of Anchorage, Chapman said.
The commercial aircraft rolled downhill 800 to 900 feet from an elevation of about 5,500 feet, Chapman said.
Victim recovery was expedited as a snowstorm threatened to obscure the area that Chapman described as having rugged terrain and weather conditions, but he said a full recovery of the site, including wreckage, was a priority. Chapman said the exact weather conditions at the time of the crash were still unknown, and details from the flight recorder had not yet been recovered.
The chopper had been chartered for a backcountry heli-skiing trip by the Tordrillo Mountain Lodge, a representative for the lodge, Mary Ann Pruitt told The Washington Post. With packages starting at $15,000 per person, the lodge bills itself as a multisport luxury facility in the remote Tordrillo mountain range.
Kellner and Larochaix, the two Czech victims, were “loyal and frequent guests” at the Tordrillo lodge, Pruitt said. Kellner, whose net worth was estimated at $17.5 billion, made his fortune selling office supplies and then buying a stake in the Czech Republic’s largest insurance company, Forbes reported.
The billionaire was the founder and majority shareholder of the Netherlands-based PPF Group, an investment fund with business spanning telecoms, finance, biotechnology, mining and real estate. The company has assets exceeding $50 billion, according to its website.
“His professional life was known for his incredible work ethic and creativity, but his private life belonged to his family,” the company said in a statement, adding the funeral would be for close family members only.
Born in North Bohemia in what was then Czechoslovakia, Kellner started his career selling photocopiers after the fall of communism in 1989, Czech media reported. He built his business empire by acquiring stakes in formerly state-owned enterprises as the country made its transition to capitalism. Most notable was a holding in what had been the state-run insurer.
Last year, PPF acquired CME, a media and entertainment company that broadcasts more than 30 television channels in Europe, from AT&T. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., was among those who raised concerns about the sale, alleging that Kellner and his company worked as a “proxies” for China.
The company has dismissed such allegations against it as “unfounded” and said that it is committed to freedom, democracy, entrepreneurship, professionalism, and a plurality of opinions. Kellner was also a former co-owner of the Czech soccer team Slavia Prague, which said it had received the news with “great sadness.”
“Slavia would like to offer its deepest and most sincere condolences to the family and friends of Mr. Kellner,” the club tweeted.
Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis also wrote his condolences on Twitter, calling Kellner’s death “an incredible tragedy.”
Kellner’s hobbies included snowboarding and kitesurfing. Larochaix, who also died in the crash, was a freestyle snowboarding coach, according to media reports.
Heli-skiing, in which a helicopter shuttles athletes to untouched patches of powdery snow, has developed a reputation as a pricey, sought-after goal for many skiers. It is banned for environmental reasons in some European countries, according to the BBC.
McManamy had worked as a heli-ski guide for over a decade, including the past five years at Tordrillo, Pruitt said. He was also an avalanche instructor and an experienced mountain guide at Denali, the tallest peak in North America.
Relatives said McManamy developed an early love for skiing and the outdoors while growing up in New England, a passion that eventually took him to wilderness training school in Colorado. He split his time between Girdwood, Alaska, and California, where he and his wife, Caitlin, had recently purchased an apartment.
“He was a great person. He was adventurous and dedicated but devoted to family as well,” his uncle, Rob McManamy, told The Washington Post. “We all admired him because he was doing things most of us can only dream about.”
Harms, who had worked at Tordrillo for 15 years, was “one of the most experienced guides in the business” and a pioneer in Alaskan heli-skiing, Pruitt said. Through his own company, Third Edge Heli, he led excursions to mountain ranges in Chile.
In Alaska, meanwhile, the Coloradan had recently set a world record for making 101 runs over a 24-hour period, according to the lodge’s website.
Russell, of Anchorage, was employed by Soloy Helicopters, the company confirmed to The Post. The Wasilla-based outfit owns and operates a fleet of 17 helicopters for a range of industries, including firefighting and diamond and seismic drill exploration, its website said.
Rescuers found wreckage from the helicopter about 21 miles from the town of Palmer, the National Transportation Safety Board’s local office told the Anchorage Daily News. Crews were working to recover the debris before a forecast snowstorm moved in.
“It’s in an area of very steep terrain, snow-covered terrain, right around 5,000 to 6,000 feet . . . on the north side of Knik River,” Clint Johnson, Alaska chief of the NTSB, told the Daily News.
In a statement, the Tordrillo Mountain Lodge said it was the first time it has faced “an event of this measure” in its 17 years in business.
A joint World Health Organization-China report on the origins of the coronavirus says it most probably jumped from animals to humans via an intermediate animal host, downplays the possibility it leaked from a lab and suggests next steps in a complex search mired in controversy, according to a copy obtained by The Washington Post.
The report, set to be released Tuesday, offers the most detailed look yet at what happened in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and early 2020. However, the findings are far from conclusive and will be overshadowed by questions about China’s lack of transparency – and the WHO’s apparent inability to press for more.
The team recommends further study of the possible path of transmission between animals and humans and on transmission through frozen food – a once-fringe theory favored by the Chinese government. It does not recommend additional research on the lab leak hypothesis.
But WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who was not part of the Wuhan mission, offered somewhat contradictory messaging at a news conference on Monday, saying “all hypotheses are open” and warrant future study.
Given China’s coverup of the outbreak in Wuhan, the WHO’s early praise for the country’s response, and the fact that it took a full year to get a joint Chinese-international team on the ground for a brief visit, the critical but challenging search for clues faced skepticism from the start.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken told CNN last week he had concerns about “the methodology and the process,” including “the fact that the government in Beijing apparently helped to write it.”
“I don’t think the global community can have confidence in this report, because of China’s lack of transparency on necessary data sources, as well as the close relationship the team had to have with China,” said Larry Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University.
“This was an expert panel who worked diligently but were blocked from finding all that it could,” he continued. “As a result, we may never know the origins of the pandemic.”
Questions about Chinese interference will be hard to shake. The terms of reference set out by WHO member states called for a collaboration between Chinese and foreign scientists, not an independent investigation or audit. Much of the data was collected by Chinese scientists ahead of the visit and then analyzed by the joint team.
Among the report’s findings is that the market linked to early cases was not necessarily the source of the virus, as some once believed, but may have been the site of an early outbreak or an accelerator, as a virus that was circulating in December 2019 spread between close-packed stalls. It does not draw a firm conclusion and calls for additional research on the role of this and other markets.
According to the report, 233 Chinese health institutions reviewed 76,253 records of cases of respiratory conditions from October and November 2019, found 92 cases compatible with SARS-Co-V2, but later ruled out each case, concluding that significant transmission before December was unlikely.
But the report questions whether the clinical criteria used to select those cases was sufficiently broad and notes that the results were based on serological testing conducted about a year later. It says the possibility of transmission before December 2019 cannot be excluded and recommends a review of methods and additional studies on Chinese blood samples.
The report reiterates the team’s belief that the virus most probably jumped from an animal, potentially a bat or pangolin, to an unknown intermediate animal host, then to humans, but the path of transmission remains a mystery. It recommends additional studies on livestock and farmed wildlife that may be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, such as cats and mink.
The mission concludes it is extremely unlikely that the virus accidentally leaked from a lab in Wuhan – a theory many scientists downplay for lack of evidence, but that others are not ready to dismiss after a single visit.
The visit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lasted a few hours, according to scientists on the trip. They got a tour of the facility, heard about the lab’s rigorous safety protocols and were told the lab was not working with viruses close to SARS-CoV-2.
One member of the team said in a post-trip television interview that researchers at the lab were sick in the fall of 2019 – a potentially interesting finding that had been raised by the Trump administration – but then dismissed its relevance and offered little else.
The final report states that there was no direct infection of workers, but does not go into detail or recommend further research on the topic.
It also notes that three laboratories in Wuhan were working with either coronavirus diagnostics or on isolation and vaccine development. All were “high quality” and “well managed,” it said, but it did not specify if the joint mission saw additional evidence, such as audits, to substantiate the claims.
The report also notes that a Wuhan Center for Disease Control lab moved on Dec. 2, 2019 – a new detail – but that it “reported no disruptions or incidents caused by the move.”
The search for the origin of any virus is challenging, but the circumstances surrounding the first known cases of this one made launching a credible investigation particularly tough.
When a novel coronavirus hit Wuhan in late 2019, Chinese officials downplayed the risk, undercounted cases and silenced would-be whistleblowers. Then, through the early weeks of the crisis, the WHO amplified some of the official Chinese line, giving a false sense of reassurance and eroding public trust.
Foreign scientists on the trip generally agree the timing and level of access was suboptimal, but stressed that they were able to obtain information the world did not have before.
Even though the Huanan market had been shut for a year and its contents removed, for instance, seeing the proximity of the stalls and the layout helped, said WHO team member Hung Nguyen-Viet, a Vietnamese expert on livestock and human health.
In interviews, Hung and another expert on the trip, Keith Hamilton of the World Organization for Animal Health, said research on the market pointed to the need for additional investigation in southern China. It is unclear if China will allow foreign scientists to return.
Dominic Dwyer, an Australian microbiologist and infectious-disease expert on the mission, stressed that the team did not have the mandate, personnel or time to conduct a formal audit on labs.
“You could do, if so desired, a more detailed forensic examination,” he said. “But that is another whole negotiation and discussion.”
“What stands out starkly is that this is the kind of situation where member states are expecting results from WHO that they have not empowered it to produce,” said Mara Pillinger, a senior associate in global health policy and governance at Georgetown’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. “They needed permission to go in, to conduct research, and on the report.”
In general, the foreign scientists on the trip took pains to praise their Chinese counterparts, noting their technical expertise and professionalism. They also acknowledged the limits of working with data collected before they arrived that may or may not be complete.
“At the end of the day,” said Hung, “They show us what they show.”
Face down and with her hands behind her, a woman cries out. She is surrounded by four police officers. One pins her to the ground, kneeling on her back.
Moments later, she lies handcuffed and silent, barefoot and motionless, as onlookers record the incident, which unfolded Saturday in the Mexican beach resort city of Tulum.
In videos published on Mexican news sites, officers can be seen picking up her limp body and carrying her toward a patrol vehicle. In the clips, they load her onto the back of the truck and appear to roll her over before driving away from the scene.
On Sunday, police confirmed that the woman had died, and opened a homicide investigation.
Later in the day, the four officers were jailed. Prosecutors said they were being charged with femicide.
The Salvadoran government and local media identified her as Victoria Salazar Arriaza, a 36-year-old Salvadoran mother of two who was living in Mexico on a humanitarian visa.
She died of broken vertebrae, according to a statement Monday from the Quintana Roo state prosecutor’s office. It accused police of using “disproportionate” force and said that the four officers would be taken into custody on suspicion of committing femicide.
“The law will be applied rigorously so this crime doesn’t go unpunished,” the statement said.
Mexican media quoted local officials as saying police detained the woman after getting a call that she was acting aggressively toward employees of a convenience store.
The videos have been viewed millions of times on Twitter, sparking widespread anger and calls for justice.
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador denounced the “brutal killing.”
On social media, users expressed horror at the incident and used the hashtag #JusticiaParaVictoria denounce police brutality. The hashtag soon gained traction, becoming one of the top trends in the country on Twitter.
Police brutality is hardly uncommon in Mexico, but it has received new attention since the death of George Floyd, a Black man who died while being detained by a White Minneapolis police officer during an arrest in the United States in May last year. During his arrest, Floyd told officers he was unable to breathe, uttering the phrase at least 25 times while he was restrained.
In video taken by onlookers, then-Officer Derek Chauvin placed his knee on Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes – a widely criticized restraint method.
Chauvin has been charged with second- and third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. His trial begins Monday. The other three officers at the scene of Floyd’s death – J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane and Tou Thao – were fired and charged with aiding and abetting and will be tried separately in August.
Floyd’s death triggered a global outcry, with thousands denouncing police brutality from the streets of London, Paris and other cities around the world.
On Sunday, demonstrators marched in the streets to demand justice for Salazar Arriaza. Some carried signs that read “Tulum Corrupto.” They chanted “justice for Victoria” and “no more corrupt killer police.”
Salvadorans also demanded justice for the victim.
The Salvadoran Foreign Ministry condemned the incident Monday and said it would continue to work closely with the Mexican government so that “the full force of the law can be applied.”
Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador, in a tweet Monday, promsied that his government would take care of Salazar Arriaga’s two children. “We only ask for justice,” he tweeted. “That those who did this face all the weight of the law.”
Tulum’s mayor, Victor Mas Tah, described the behavior of the officers as “deplorable” and offered his condolences to the victim’s family. Mash Tah, who is seeking reelection, demanded a thorough investigation into the incident.
“As a government authority, we join in with the calls from civil society, collectives, and associations. We will not allow these situations in Tulum,” he said Sunday, adding that the situation was “unacceptable.”