Yingluck testifies on rice scandal

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Yingluck-testifies-on-rice-scandal-30282368.html

COURT

At a Supreme Court hearing about the rice-pledging scheme of former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra’s government, a former deputy chief of the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO) said the scheme’s outstanding debt stood at Bt409.15 billion as of May 22, 2014.

Sirasa Kanpitaya, who was transferred from her post at the PDMO on February 20, 2014, also pointed out that the debt did not include the Bt90-billion loan from the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperative.

Yingluck’s government spent close to Bt1 trillion purchasing rice from farmers at a price higher than the prevailing market price, resulting in losses of more than Bt500 billion, public prosecutors have said.

Under the scheme, the government was supposed to sell some of the stored rice to help to reduce the public debt, but most of the government-to-government deals were later discovered to be fake, other witnesses said.

Asked if she had been transferred from her PDMO post due to her refusal to increase state loans for this scheme, Sirasa said it had not been legally possible to borrow more money due to a House resolution.

//

Yingluck was also present in court yesterday to hear the testimony of state witnesses.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has issued an order barring the media from “misleading” the public by wrongly interpreting court hearings after Yingluck’s legal team complained that two newspapers and a TV station reported on the case inaccurately.

 

Sorrayuth guilty in bribery scandal

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Sorrayuth-guilty-in-bribery-scandal-30280500.html

COURT

Pressure mounts on channel 3 to drop news host after 13-year jail term.

THE CRIMINAL Court yesterday handed down guilty verdicts to all defendants in the Rai-Som bribery and embezzlement scandal, including famous TV news host Sorrayuth Suthassanachinda, who was given 13 years and four months in prison.

After the verdict, pressure is growing on Channel 3 television station, as media watchdogs have said Sorrayuth should not continue in his role as a news host.

The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC)’s subpanel regulating TV programming and scheduling will today discuss Sorrayuth’s case to determine if he should be allowed on screen, a source said. Although Rai-Som was not directly governed by the NBTC, Channel 3 operator Bangkok Entertainment Co Ltd needed to show its responsibility in this regard, as the TV station was now under the authority’s licence-based regime.

Thepchai Yong said yesterday in his capacity as president of the Thai Broadcast Journalists Association: “If we want government agencies, civil servants and politicians to have good standards, media should demonstrate good standards too.” He said Sorrayuth should take responsibility for the offences and step down.

//

Sorrayuth, the founder of Rai-Som Co Ltd, has long been a popular host of the morning news show “Rueang Lao Chao Nee”. He has also appeared in two other news programmes; all of them are broadcast on Channel 3.

Rai-Som, Sorrayuth and one of his former staffers, Montha Thiradet, were convicted of wrongdoing related to the payment of more than Bt600,000 to Pitchapa Iamsa-ard, who was then an employee of MCOT, between 2005 and 2006.

Pitchapa, a defendant in the same case, did not report to MCOT additional TV commercials that Rai-Som aired during its popular TV programme “Kui Khui Khao” on Channel 9. As a result, Rai-Som received additional advertising revenue that was not shared with MCOT, resulting in damages of more than Bt138 million.

The Criminal Court gave Pitchapa a 20-year jail term in addition to sentencing Sorrayuth and Montha to 13 years and four months each. Rai-Som was ordered to pay an Bt80,000 fine.

All defendants denied wrongdoing and are now free on bail of Bt2 million each. The court granted the bail on condition that the defendants report themselves to the court every 30 days and cannot leave the country without permission.

Secretary-general of the Anti-Corruption Organisation of Thailand, Mana Mitmongkhon, said that if an actor or singer engaged in scandalous behaviour, he or she should be suspended from duty.

“Suspension is also imminent as soon as holders of political office are convicted by the courts,” he said.

He said society would soon find out if further action would be taken against Sorrayuth. “It’s a matter of conscience and social responsibility.”

Manop Thip-osod, vice president of the Thai Journalists Association, said Sorrayuth should review his role in the wake of the guilty verdict.

“Media are expected to fight against injustices,” he said.

Sorrayuth did not appear on Channel 3’s evening news show yesterday. Station executives convened an urgent meeting at 3pm to discuss how to proceed in the wake of the much-publicised case. They were expected to make a statement soon.

Pakdee Pothisiri, a former member of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), said the verdict in the Rai-Som case set a good precedent for other cases. “It reflects that if a case involves corruption, the punishment will be harsh,” he said.

Born in 1966, Sorrayuth graduated from Bangkok University’s faculty of communication arts with first-class honours. He started his career as a reporter at The Nation. In 1997, he was promoted to the post of news editor and assigned to host news-commentary TV programmes produced by the Nation Multimedia Group (NMG).

At the time he decided to leave the NMG, he was The Nation’s deputy managing editor. At the peak of his career, he won awards including a Golden Television Award in 2012.

 

Rice scheme accounting questioned

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Rice-scheme-accounting-questioned-30279555.html

COURT

Former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra greets supporters as she arrives at the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions in Bangkok yesterday for a hearing in her trial on criminal charges stemming from her government’s rice

Former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra greets supporters as she arrives at the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions in Bangkok yesterday for a hearing in her trial on criminal charges stemming from her government’s rice

Yingluck cheered by supporters; Democrat Warong points to ‘fake govt-to-govt deals’

THE PREVIOUS government’s rice-pledging scheme did not have a proper accounting system, resulting in loopholes on disbursements of the state budget and a lack of the project’s clear financial status, according to a certified public accountant testifying before the Supreme Court against former premier Yingluck Shinawatra.

Yingluck also attended yesterday’s testimony by state witnesses at the Supreme Court, which held a second hearing on alleged wrongdoing by the ex-premier. Public prosecutors have accused Yingluck of negligence in implementing the rice-pledging scheme, resulting in a loss of more than Bt500 billion, even though many farmers benefited from the scheme.

Yingluck had earlier said she would fight the case in court and denied any wrongdoing. The former premier was cheered by a large number of supporters and former Cabinet members who gathered at the court building.

Warong Dejkitvikom, a former opposition Democrat MP, said Yingluck’s Pheu Thai party has tried to convince the public that if the rice-pledging scheme was a good policy, then how could the ex-premier be guilty in executing such a policy.

According to Warong, there were fake government-to-government rice deals under the scheme, as the Yingluck government was unsuccessful in trying to sell a large quantity of rice purchased from farmers. The Yingluck government spent as much as Bt990 billion on the scheme, buying rice from farmers nationwide at a price of Bt15,000 per tonne compared to the prevailing market price of only Bt9,000, resulting in a huge loss of more than Bt500 billion.

According to Nangnoi Charerntaweesub, an accounting expert, who served as a state witness, the rice-pledging scheme should have had a proper accounting system to keep financial records on the disbursement of taxpayers’ money. In general, there should be periodical accounting of the scheme, be it every three months or six months or at the very least on a yearly basis.

This will allow auditors to have a clear picture of the project’s financial status at a given time. She said there were only accounts prepared separately by some state agencies concerned with the scheme such as the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives or Public Warehouse Organisation so the big picture was not available, resulting in loopholes on budget disbursement.

Nangnoi also told the court that those who were responsible for this project should have ordered an audit of all accounts on rice pledging, payment and other financial information to show the scheme’s financial status. In addition, it was wrong to argue that the scheme was still running at that time so the accounts could not be audited.