Wall Street is being hunted by futures cops for government leaks

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379380?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Wall Street is being hunted by futures cops for government leaks

Dec 13. 2019
A Wall Street street sign hangs in front of the New York Stock Exchange in New York on May 25, 2018. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Michael Nagle.

A Wall Street street sign hangs in front of the New York Stock Exchange in New York on May 25, 2018. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Michael Nagle.
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg ·Matt Robinson, Ben Bain 

742 Viewed

U.S. regulators are digging into a topic that has been the talk of Wall Street and Washington ever since a controversial Vanity Fair article suggested investors made billions of dollars trading ahead of market-moving news: Are government leaks fueling big profits in the futures market?

For months, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has been quietly ramping up efforts to hunt for suspicious transactions by using technology to pore through reams of market data, said three people familiar with the matter who asked not to be named because the examination isn’t public. The goal is to assess whether some traders are getting a heads up before the release of key economic statistics or federal agencies’ policy announcements.

The CFTC began the push well before the Vanity Fair story ran in October. Upon reviewing the trades highlighted in the piece, the agency was unconvinced and couldn’t substantiate its insinuations of wrongdoing, said two of the people. The Securities and Exchange Commission reached a similar conclusion, one of the people said.

Still, watchdogs acknowledge that the article spotlighted an issue that risks undermining investor confidence: The futures market hasn’t been policed for insider trading nearly as much as the stock market has.

In theory, that could make the derivatives ideal for traders to take advantage of illicit tips that precede big moves for currencies, oil prices or even broad equity indexes. And news out of Washington, including reports on monthly job growth and President Donald Trump’s tweets, is known to trigger some of the wildest swings in futures markets.

CFTC and SEC officials declined to comment on the Vanity Fair article. But CFTC Enforcement Director Jamie McDonald was adamant that regulators have stepped up their data-crunching to boost market surveillance.

“The early returns on our investments in data analytics have been positive,” he said in a statement. “We expect the longer-term impact of our efforts to be even more substantial, as we continue to prioritize detecting and prosecuting misconduct that can undermine the integrity of our markets, like the various forms of insider trading prohibited in the derivatives and commodities markets.”

Concern that futures traders might be profiting from inside information prompted lawmakers to include a provision known as the Eddie Murphy rule in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. The regulation for the first time made it illegal for investors to engage in the type of scheme depicted in the famed 1980s movie “Trading Places,” in which characters played by Murphy and Dan Aykroyd used a leaked government crop report to make millions betting on orange juice futures.

“There’s much more behavior that is prohibited under the new law,” said Geoffrey Aronow, a law partner at Sidley Austin and former head of enforcement at the CFTC. “The new law is a bigger hammer for the CFTC to bring insider trading cases. It’s an incredibly broad provision.”

Yet in the decade since Congress approved Dodd-Frank, there’s little evidence that the CFTC has made much use of the Eddie Murphy rule beyond a smattering of cases. For example, the CFTC accused a broker last year of sharing customers’ confidential investments in energy contracts with a friend and using the friend’s account to make trades.

McDonald, a former federal prosecutor who joined the CFTC in 2017, has made an effort to prioritize insider trading, announcing last year that the agency had formed a specialized task force.

The CFTC now faces more pressure to show results, particularly in ensuring that government leaks aren’t giving some traders an edge. After Vanity Fair published its story, a dozen Democratic lawmakers demanded that the agency, the SEC and criminal authorities investigate the “disturbing reports of suspicious trading in our futures and equities markets” described in the article.

The Oct. 16 piece dubbed the transactions “Trump Chaos Trades” because they were all made shortly before market-moving news — some of which involved public statements by the U.S. president. The story cited unnamed traders speculating that inside information played a role in five perfectly-timed transactions involving S&P 500 e-mini futures that netted gains of as much as $1.8 billion.

Wall Street widely panned the article. The piece attributed billions of dollars worth of transactions to a single bad actor or group of cheaters, a premise that industry insiders said was an implausible reading of trading data.

CME Group Chief Executive Officer Terry Duffy, who runs the exchange where the trades purportedly took place, called the story “nonsensical.” Other critics said comments by public figures such as Trump frequently move markets so someone looking for suspicious timing is almost guaranteed to find it.

The story’s author, William D. Cohan, said his article was based on traders with decades of experience alerting him to suspicious transactions.

“I reported what traders were telling me,” he said in an email. “I am pleased the regulators looked into it and I am ecstatic they didn’t find anything.”

Democrats have previously expressed concern that Trump or his aides might be inappropriately sharing market-moving information.

Last year, three senators including Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren asked the SEC and CFTC to investigate whether there were unusual transactions tied to a June 2018 incident when Trump drove markets higher by tweeting that he was “looking forward” to the jobs report about an hour before its release. At lawmakers’ behest, regulators looked into the matter and didn’t bring a case, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Merkel faces revolt over Huawei as lawmakers seek full ban

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379377?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Merkel faces revolt over Huawei as lawmakers seek full ban

Dec 13. 2019
German Chancellor Angela Merkel is facing a potential revolt in parliament.(File Photo)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel is facing a potential revolt in parliament.(File Photo)
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Patrick Donahue 

680 Viewed

German Chancellor Angela Merkel is facing a potential revolt in parliament by lawmakers seeking to override her China policy and effectively ban equipment supplier Huawei Technologies Co. from the country’s fifth-generation wireless network.

A bill drafted by lawmakers in Merkel’s ruling coalition stipulates that German authorities should be able to exclude “untrustworthy” 5G equipment vendors from “core as well as peripheral networks.” That goes beyond previous calls that sought to ban the Chinese firm from the more sensitive core network alone.

The effort in the Bundestag, Germany’s lower house of parliament, is a major challenge to Merkel’s attempts at balancing security considerations over 5G with Germany’s delicate economic ties with China. Hawks in her government, including German intelligence agencies and the Interior Ministry, have warned that Huawei’s ties to the government in Beijing pose a security risk.

While the draft doesn’t explicitly name Huawei, it’s tailored to the Chinese company and comes after months of debate about 5G security. Huawei has repeatedly denied allegations over potential espionage and sabotage.

The draft legislation obtained by Bloomberg News says that security guidelines set out by Merkel’s government, which include a certification process and a declaration of trustworthiness, don’t go far enough. The political and legal systems in a vendor’s country of origin must also be taken into account, the draft says in a direct allusion to China.

While negotiators haggle over a final draft, the stringent security standards set by lawmakers in Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union-led bloc and in the Social Democratic party illustrate the momentum building against the Shenzhen-based technology giant. CDU lawmakers approved a motion at a party convention last month calling for further restrictions.

Calling 5G technology Germany’s “digital nervous system,” lawmakers said that Europe already possessed two companies that represent an alternative to “state subsidized” competitors posing a threat — a reference to Finland’s Nokia Oyj and Sweden’s Ericsson AB.

“It is thus in Germany’s own interest to rely on European solutions with respect to the 5G network expansion and to cultivate European champions,” the draft said.

Excluding Huawei from the peripheral network — and not just the more sensitive core — would create headaches for Germany’s telecom companies, who have warned that banning the vendor would delay the county’s 5G build-out and make it more expensive.

Telefonica’s German unit, which operates the country’s second-largest wireless network, earlier this week said Wednesday it picked Huawei and Nokia to take an equal role in supplying its 5G network upgrade.

The Merkel government had proposed a compromise that imposes partial restrictions that Telecom executives were prepared to accept as long as the Chinese vendor had access to less sensitive parts.

But the lawmakers’ proposal would even go beyond a recommendation by Merkel’s spy chief, Bruno Kahl, the head of the Federal Intelligence Service. While Huawei is too dependent on the Chinese Communist Party and “can’t be fully trusted,” Kahl said in October, “there may be areas where a participation doesn’t have to be excluded.”

Lagarde marks ECB policy debut with optimistic note for economy

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379376?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Lagarde marks ECB policy debut with optimistic note for economy

Dec 13. 2019
Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, speaks during the central bank's rate decision news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, on Dec. 12, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Alex Kraus.

Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, speaks during the central bank’s rate decision news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, on Dec. 12, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Alex Kraus.
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Paul Gordon, Piotr Skolimowski

611 Viewed

Christine Lagarde said the euro zone’s economic slowdown is showing tentative signs of bottoming out after her first policy meeting as president of the European Central Bank, in comments that suggested further interest-rate cuts are unlikely any time soon.

 

“There are some initial signs of stabilization in the growth slowdown and of a mild increase in underlying inflation,” she told reporters on Thursday. “The risks surrounding the euro-area growth outlook, related to geopolitical factors, rising protectionism and vulnerabilities in emerging markets, remain tilted to the downside, but have become somewhat less pronounced.”

The euro jumped as high as $1.1154 before paring gains to trade up 0.1% at $1.1141 at 3:21 p.m. Frankfurt time.

Still, Lagarde unveiled updated economic forecasts that show the outlook remains muted for now. Growth will be 1.1% next year — a slight revision lower — and 1.4% in 2021, the bank predicted. The first outlook for 2022 showed an expansion of 1.4% that year. Inflation is seen at 1.6% in 2022 — still below the goal of just under 2%.

The Governing Council earlier held its deposit rate at a record-low minus 0.5%, and bond purchases at 20 billion euros ($22 billion) a month, sticking to a controversial package unveiled in September.

Yet pressed on whether the ECB needs to take further action, Lagarde said that “we are very aware of the side effects” of negative rates and called on governments to help out with fiscal stimulus and structural reforms. “It would be very welcome to have other policies join the monetary policy in order to support the reduction of slack.”

The president also pledged the central bank’s first strategic review since 2003, giving it an opportunity to assess whether the inflation goal needs to be adjusted. On Thursday, she said such a review is “overdue” and she aims to start it in January, completing it before the end of the year.

It needs to be “comprehensive” and include consultation with members of the European Parliament, the academic community and representatives of civil society, she said. She added that there is no “preconceived landing zone” but it will address challenges including climate change, technology, and rising inequality.

She expressed disappointment that the European Union was unable to agree this week on a set of standards for defining green investments, which would have been “extremely helpful” for the ECB in her ambition to contribute to combating global warming. That’s a “call to find an agreement,” she said.

Lagarde’s broad plans have worried some officials, who fear being diverted from their primary mandate of restoring price stability. Inflation has averaged just 1.2% so far in 2019, despite years of unprecedented and often contentious stimulus.

While some economic indicators have suggested lately that the bloc’s slowdown might be easing, Germany remains embroiled in its worst manufacturing slump in a decade, and the U.S.-China trade war and Brexit have continued to weigh on growth. Lagarde said the latest signs are that U.S.-China talks are “heading in a better direction.”

She also signaled that she’ll take a far broader view of the ECB’s mission, saying she wants to “explore each and every corner” of the institution’s operations to “better respond to serving euro-area citizens” as well as delivering on the price-stability mandate.

Aramco closes just below $2 trillion goal in second-day gain

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379373?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Aramco closes just below $2 trillion goal in second-day gain

Dec 13. 2019
Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia's deputy crown prince, during a bilateral meeting with then-U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on April 4, 2017. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Simon Dawson.

Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s deputy crown prince, during a bilateral meeting with then-U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on April 4, 2017. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Simon Dawson.
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Filipe Pacheco

557 Viewed

Saudi Aramco shares rose for a second day, but the oil giant failed to hold on to the $2 trillion valuation that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had long targeted.

The stock climbed 4.6% to close at 36.80 riyals in Riyadh, finishing at $1.96 trillion. Aramco earlier rose as much as 10%, the daily limit, in trading of 418 million shares, up from 31.6 million Wednesday.

The gain, which follows a 10% surge on Wednesday, reflects the kingdom’s efforts to engineer a successful start to trading after international investors balked at the price in the initial public offering. Saudi Arabia encouraged local individuals to purchase and hold the stock through cheap loans and a bonus-share plan, while pushing wealthy families and regional allies to buy as well.

The offering consisted of only 1.5% of Aramco’s stock, so that investors who didn’t get allocated shares in the IPO had to buy in the secondary market.

“We were expecting this IPO to be a blockbuster, and the performance in the past two days shows that was the case,” said Vijay Valecha, chief investment officer at Century Financial Consultancy in Dubai, who has high-net-worth individuals from the Gulf among his clients. “From the appetite we see for the stock, there is room for it to climb another 10% to 18% next week.”

Aramco raised $25.6 billion in the deal, selling shares at 32 riyals each and overtaking Microsoft and Apple as the most valuable listed company.

The IPO has become synonymous with the crown prince and his efforts to reshape the economy of the world’s biggest oil exporter. But his insistence on the $2 trillion valuation deterred international investors, many of whom said the stock was too expensive given governance and geopolitical concerns.

Analysts at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. said after the first trading day that it’s already time to cash out. In a Bloomberg survey last month, global money managers put Aramco’s fair value at between $1.2 trillion and $1.5 trillion.

While hitting the target may vindicate Saudi officials, it could complicate any plans to sell part of Aramco’s shares abroad as originally envisaged by Prince Mohammed in 2016, when he said a dual listing could raise as much as $100 billion. Saudi officials met in recent weeks with international investors to sound them out on a possible listing of Aramco’s shares in Asia, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

Still, the IPO — touted as part of a blueprint for life after oil for the kingdom — is a watershed moment for a business that’s bankrolled Saudi Arabia and its rulers for decades.

The debut was cheered by Saudi and Gulf investors, who see the stock price supported by Aramco’s guaranteed dividends, buying by index-tracking funds and the fact that the region doesn’t have any other listed major oil companies.

Aramco’s “$2 trillion valuation is justified due to secured dividend streams,” Arqaam Capital analysts including Rita Guindy and Jaap Meijer wrote in a report on Wednesday in which they initiated coverage with a buy recommendation and price target of 39.20 riyals.

Arqaam expects a gradual increase of 2% annually in the dividend, potentially being topped up by a special payout of $20 billion in the next three years.

Federal Reserve predicts no interest rate cuts in 2020, ignoring Trump’s calls to boost the economy

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379340?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Federal Reserve predicts no interest rate cuts in 2020, ignoring Trump’s calls to boost the economy

Dec 12. 2019
The Federal Reserve's chairman, Jerome Powell

The Federal Reserve’s chairman, Jerome Powell
By The Washington Post · Heather Long

1,344 Viewed

WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve hit the pause button Wednesday, deciding to leave interest rates unchanged for now and signaling no plans to cut in 2020. President Donald Trump has repeatedly urged the Fed to slash rates, but the central banks says the U.S. economy is in a good place and does not need an extra boost.

The Fed lowered the interest rate in July, September and October in an effort to calm recession fears on Wall Street and counter the negative impact of Trump’s trade war. The benchmark U.S. interest rate is just shy of 1.75 percent, down from nearly 2.5 percent a year ago.

A lower interest rate makes it cheaper to borrow money to buy a home and car or to start a business. It also means savers get less in monthly interest on the money they keep in savings accounts at banks. Many retirees have complained the Fed is hurting them by keeping rates down, but Fed Chair Jerome Powell has said his top goal is ensuring that the recovery, which is now in its 11th year, keeps going.

“We expect moderate growth to continue,” Powell said in a news conference Wednesday. “We reduced [interest rates] by three-quarters of a percentage point. This shift has helped support the economy and has kept the economy on track.”

Fed leaders predict the economy will grow 2 percent next year, a downgrade from 2.2 percent growth this year and 2.9 percent in 2018.

For months, the Fed has stressed there were many “head winds” and “uncertainties” about the economic outlook, but there is no longer any mention of that in the official statement, an indication that the central bank thinks the economy is stronger now than it was over the summer.

“Do-nothing Congress, and now do-nothing Federal Reserve,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Bank. “Looks like policy is stuck in neutral here at 1.75 percent without a recession or inflation, neither of which are very likely anytime soon.”

Trump has blasted the Fed for allegedly keeping interest rates too high, calling central bank officials “boneheads.” He has urged them to cut rates to zero, effectively allowing people and businesses to borrow money free. But Wall Street investors and most economists think the Fed will stay on hold for months to come. Investors are penciling in one more rate cut before the election, probably in July or September.

Powell left the door open to changing interest rates in 2020, but he stressed there is a high bar for moving rates up or down.

“We’re going to do what we think is the right thing for the economy,” Powell said. If there is a “material reassessment of our outlook, we would respond accordingly.”

Economists say the Fed’s actions kept the economy on track despite head winds from weak global growth and Trump’s trade war.

Recession fears peaked in August when the “yield curve” inverted – a warning sign that typically occurs a year or two before a recession takes hold. But the yield curve has returned to normal, and the chance of recession has fallen from about 50 percent in August to below 25 percent now, according to most analysts.

Stocks are now back at record highs. Unemployment is at a half-century low, inflation remains tame, and the economy continues to grow at a healthy pace around 2 percent, with little chance of a recession. Wall Street is also hopeful that Trump will not enact any more tariffs.

As the economic outlook has improved for 2020, Trump has lessened his attacks on the Fed. He tweeted (or retweeted) 43 times about the Fed ahead of the central bank’s September meeting. He reduced that to five times ahead of the Fed’s October meeting and nine times ahead of Wednesday’s meeting.

The Fed’s policy-setting committee will holds its next meeting Jan. 28-29, less than a week before the Iowa caucuses begin the primary process to select the Democratic presidential nominee.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is the only candidate seeking the Democratic nomination who agrees with Trump that interest rates are too high. Most Democrats do not think it is appropriate for the president to weigh in on monetary policy, which is supposed to be independent of politics.

“The big news was that the vote was unanimous for the first time in five meetings. This signals a higher level of comfort with the state of the economy,” said Tendayi Kapfidze, chief economist at LendingTree.

Stocks rise, dollar falls on ‘accommodative’ Fed

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379338?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Stocks rise, dollar falls on ‘accommodative’ Fed

Dec 12. 2019
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Sarah Ponczek, Vildana Hajric

1,131 Viewed

U.S. stocks rose with Treasuries, while the dollar fell after the Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged and its chairman signaled it would keep policy “somewhat accommodative.”

The S&P 500 halted a two-day slide as the central bank’s decision fueled bets that the bar for an increase in rates remains high even as economic growth is steady. The 10-year Treasury rate fell below 1.8%.

The Fed, in its first unanimous vote since May, said it will continue to monitor the implications of data for the economic outlook “including global developments and muted inflation pressures.” Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank will keep rates where they are unless there’s a meaningful change in the outlook.

“It’s ‘steady as she goes’ from the Fed today,” said Jason Pride, chief investment officer of private wealth at Glenmede Trust. “This accommodative stance should provide a measure of support for risk assets heading into the new year.”

Equity gains had been muted throughout the session as investors kept an eye out for trade headlines. The Dow Jones industrial average was little changed amid more trouble for Boeing’s Max plane and Home Depot’s weak forecast. Crude slipped after U.S. inventory data was released.

With the world’s top two economies still wrangling over an interim deal, Thursday may bring news as President Donald Trump is expected to talk to his trade team about china, according to people familiar with the talks.

– – –

Here are some other key events to watch:

– Brazil’s central bank also decides on interest rate.

– The next European Central Bank policy meeting is on Thursday.

– The U.K. holds a general election Thursday.

– – –

And these are the main market moves:

Stocks

The S&P 500 index gained 0.3% at 4 p.m. New York time.

The Nasdaq composite index advanced 0.6%.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.1%.

The MSCI All-Country World Index climbed 0.4%.

Currencies

The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fell 0.4%.

The Japanese yen rose 0.2% to 108.55 per dollar.

The euro added 0.3% to $1.1131.

Bonds

The yield on two-year Treasuries lost three basis points to 1.62%.

The yield on 10-year Treasuries fell five basis points to 1.79%.

Germany’s 10-year yield declined two basis points to -0.32%.

Commodities

West Texas Intermediate crude fell 0.7% to $58.84 a barrel.

Gold futures advanced 0.8% to $1,479.50 an ounce.

Brent crude gained lost 1.1% to $63.62 a barrel.

ExxonMobil just won a big climate court case in New York. But it’s not in the clear yet.

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379326?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

ExxonMobil just won a big climate court case in New York. But it’s not in the clear yet.

Dec 12. 2019
By The Washington Post · Dino Grandoni 909 Viewed

ExxonMobil just beat the state of New York in a closely-watched climate fraud case. But other state and local governments suing the oil and natural gas company say they remain confident they can still prevail in their own legal fights.

The nation’s largest energy company successfully fended off claims Tuesday by New York that it misled investors for years in how it calculated the financial risks of climate change. The high-profile trial marked the culmination of a four-year-old probe under three top prosecutors in New York.

But Exxon is not yet in the clear. Congress too gridlocked to pass major climate legislation, other left-leaning cities and states have also turned to the courts to hold oil companies accountable for their role in climate change – and are making their cases on arguments different than those brought in New York.

“The New York suit was based on one specific alleged violation of a statute that is peculiar to New York,” said Michael Gerrard, a professor of environmental law at Columbia Law School. “That theory didn’t fly. But it has little bearing on the wide variety of other legal theories that are being deployed in climate change cases.”

New York Supreme Court Judge Barry Ostrager ruled that the state failed to show that the oil giant broke state securities laws when describing to shareholders how it analyzed the effect of future greenhouse gas regulations on the company’s bottom line, Steven Mufson and I reported.

During a 12-day trial this fall, the state tried to wield a powerful anti-fraud state law, called the Martin Act, that does not require prosecutors to prove that a company intended to deceive investors. The office of New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, tried to show the company lied to investors by keeping two sets of books – one public, one private – for estimating the cost of complying with future climate regulations.

But even with that relatively low bar, Ostrager found New York’s allegations “to be without merit” and the use of the state’s securities law to be a stretch. Ostrager found that Exxon had been transparent about the two different ways it calculated those costs and that New York had failed to show that “any reasonable investor” would have been misled.

Taking heed of that ruling is Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat who brought a similar suit against Exxon in October. Her office, like New York, says Exxon misled with its use of so-called “proxy costs” for carbon.

But that is not the only claim Massachusetts is making. The state is also suing Exxon for misrepresenting the environmental benefits of some of its gasoline and motor oil products and for failing to disclose the risks of climate change caused by burning fossil fuels.

Chloe Gotsis, a spokeswoman for Healey’s office, said Massachusetts is not daunted by the ruling from New York since its claims relate to advertising, and not just cost estimates for complying with regulation.

“We will continue our work to hold the company accountable for its misrepresentations,” she said.

Andrew Logan, director of the oil and gas program at Ceres, a non-profit group of environmentalists and investors, said the emphasis on consumers and misinforming the general public in the Massachusetts case would avoid the need to find harm to a “reasonable investor.”

“These cases will get easier to prove unfortunately as climate change gets worse,” Logan said. “But if you wait long enough for damage to be obvious, you miss the opportunity to prevent it in the first place.”

Perhaps even more concerning to Exxon and other oil companies is the slew of other local governments seeking compensation from them for the damage rising temperatures have already wrought to drought-plagued farmers and beachfront businesses.

Prosecutors in Baltimore, Rhode Island, San Francisco and Oakland, as well as coalitions of communities in the mountains of Colorado and along the coast of California, have brought lawsuits in state court claiming various oil companies have created a “public nuisance” – a charge more typically brought against a noisy neighbor – for the heat-trapping pollution their products have put into the atmosphere.

Those cases are still winding their way through the court system, and there are still a number of hurdles litigants need to leap. Federal judges are still sorting out whether the claims should be heard at the state or federal level. Oil firms have sought to move the cases to the federal court system since the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of industry in a 2011 public nuisance suit.

But the ruling out of New York shouldn’t be one of those barriers, said David Bookbinder, chief counsel at the Niskanen Center, a think tank in Washington, since the public nuisance cases rely on a different set of laws.

“It has zero relevance to those cases,” said Bookbinder, who is representing the three local governments in Colorado in their suit against Exxon and Suncor Energy, a Canadian oil company.

Last year, Exxon gave $1 million to promote a plan to grant oil companies immunity from climate lawsuits in exchange for passing a tax on carbon emissions, though the group that came up with that plan, Americans for Carbon Dividends, recently backed away from the idea of shielding companies from court cases.

Chevron to take $11 billion writedown amid weak gas prices

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379325?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Chevron to take $11 billion writedown amid weak gas prices

Dec 12. 2019
A Chevron gas station in Dallas on July. 26, 2017. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Cooper Neill.
Photo by: Cooper Neill — Bloomberg

A Chevron gas station in Dallas on July. 26, 2017. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Cooper Neill. Photo by: Cooper Neill — Bloomberg
By Syndication Washington Post, Bloomberg · Kevin Crowley 

895 Viewed

Chevron Corp. expects to write down as much as $11 billion in the fourth quarter, more than half of it from its Appalachia natural gas assets after a slump in prices.

The U.S. oil major is considering the sale of its shale-gas holdings, along with its Kitimat liquefied natural gas project in Canada, according to a statement Tuesday. Chevron said it will keep its 2020 capital budget at $20 billion, the third consecutive year it hasn’t boosted spending.

The company’s actions come from a chief executive officer, Mike Wirth, whose mantra has been capital discipline. Wirth earlier this year earned $1 billion for the company by walking away from a bidding war for Anadarko Petroleum Corp. San Ramon, California-based Chevron is the best performer among the five Western oil majors this year, but it has faced mounting costs at its Tengiz project in Kazakhstan.

“The Appalachia writedown should be baked in, but the others are incrementally negative” for the stock, said Muhammed Ghulam, a Houston-based analyst at Raymond James & Associates. “I would expect most companies to have to write down gas assets this year.”

Chevron follows Schlumberger and Repsol in ascribing a lower value to their assets at a time when the growing adoption of cleaner energy stokes speculation that demand for fossil fuels may peak in a few years, while supplies keep rising. The oil-services giant posted a $12.7 billion writedown in October, while the Spanish producer took $5.3 billion off its balance sheet last week.

The gas glut is particularly pronounced in North America where shale production is flooding local markets. Wirth said his decision to walk away from certain gas assets illustrates the company’s discipline in protecting shareholder funds.

“The best use of our capital is investing in our most advantaged assets,” Wirth said in the statement. “With capital discipline and a conservative outlook comes the responsibility to make the tough choices necessary to deliver higher cash returns to our shareholders over the long term.”

Wirth has made crude production from the Permian Basin a centerpiece of his global strategy, with a budget of $4 billion for the shale play next year. The giant Tengiz joint venture in the Caspian Sea, whose total cost has surged to about $45 billion, will receive $3.75 billion from Chevron in 2020.

“Tengiz project overruns raised questions about Chevron’s commitment to capital discipline, but plans to shelve or divest Appalachia and Kitimat LNG show the company will target returns over resources,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Fernando Valle wrote in a note.

U.S. natural gas futures prices have slumped this year amid a supply glut, and are now averaging about $2.54 per million British thermal units. If it finishes the year at that level, it’ll be the lowest average price since 1999.

The move to write down Appalachian gas is likely to put pressure on other producers in the region to do the same. Newly built gas export terminals along the U.S. Gulf Coast have so far failed to absorb the excess supply.

Chevron held more than 750,000 net acres in the Marcellus and Utica shale formations, which stretch from West Virginia to Pennsylvania and Ohio, according to a 2017 fact sheet on its website. The writedown also encompasses the Big Foot oil platform in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which began producing last year.

Huawei wins Telefonica deal to help build German 5G network

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379323?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Huawei wins Telefonica deal to help build German 5G network

Dec 12. 2019
The Huawei logo at the IFA consumer electronics show in Berlin on Sept. 5, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Krisztian Bocsi.

The Huawei logo at the IFA consumer electronics show in Berlin on Sept. 5, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Krisztian Bocsi.
By Syndication Washington Post,  Bloomberg · Stefan Nicola

788 Viewed

China’s Huawei Technologies Co. just got a seal of approval from one of Germany’s biggest telecom companies.

Telefonica’s German unit, which operates the country’s second-largest wireless network, picked Huawei and Finland’s Nokia to take an equal role supplying its fifth-generation mobile phone network upgrade, the company said in a statement Wednesday. The deal is subject to the firms getting certified by German authorities, it said.

The announcement is a boon to Huawei after Deutsche Telekom AG said last week it has stopped ordering new 5G equipment because of political uncertainty over Chinese suppliers. Huawei has repeatedly denied allegations its equipment could be used for espionage.

There’s one caveat, though. The German government is currently drawing up security guidelines for the country’s 5G network expansion, in a move that’s expected to require certification of equipment, including antennas.

Hawks in the intelligence community would like to tighten the rules in a way that would block Huawei. Chancellor Angela Merkel has said in the past she doesn’t want to bar the Chinese firm as long as it abides by certain security standards. It isn’t yet clear what requirements will ultimately be put in place, so it may be too early for Huawei to declare victory in Germany.

The deal with both firms to supply the less-sensitive radio access network “will be subject to the successful safety certification of the technology and the companies,” Telefonica Deutschland Holding said in the statement. The company “is taking into account the ongoing political process of establishing these security guidelines without delaying the start of the 5G expansion.”

Telefonica Deutschland hasn’t yet selected a supplier to upgrade the more-sensitive core network — the ‘brain’ that houses control functions — and won’t do so until next year, Chief Executive Officer Markus Haas said on a call with reporters.

The company’s shares fell 2.1% at 11:24 a.m. in Frankfurt. Its strategy update, presented to investors in London this morning, indicated it would cut its 2019 dividend to 17 euro cents a share from 27 euro cents.

Telefonica Deutschland is targeting sales growth of at least 5% through 2022 and is seeking to improve its profit margin during that period. The company is confident it can win more customers in rural areas and add fixed-line clients as well as corporate customers that install 5G in their factories, Haas said on the call.

Saudi oil giant Aramco starts trading shares a week after historic IPO

#ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30379322?utm_source=category&utm_medium=internal_referral

Saudi oil giant Aramco starts trading shares a week after historic IPO

Dec 11. 2019
Employees monitor trading prices for Saudi Aramco stocks in the investment branch of the Arab National Bank in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on Dec. 11, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Faisal Al Nasser.

Employees monitor trading prices for Saudi Aramco stocks in the investment branch of the Arab National Bank in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on Dec. 11, 2019. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Faisal Al Nasser.
By The Washington Post · Sarah Dadouch 

658 Viewed

The Saudi Arabian Oil Company, the most profitable commercial enterprise in the world, started trading shares on Wednesday, a week after its long-awaited listing on the Saudi Arabian stock exchange broke the record as the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history.

 

The company, known as Aramco and frequently dubbed the “crown jewel” of Saudi Arabia, was partially privatized as part of a campaign by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to wean the kingdom off its dependence on oil.

Since becoming the heir to the crown in 2017, Mohammed has emphasized the importance of economic diversification in the conservative kingdom. Global fears regarding climate change and worries about the use of fossil fuels has played a part in Saudi Arabia selling a stake in Aramco, which was the world’s most profitable company last year, followed by Apple and Industrial & Commercial Bank of China.

Last week’s IPO stood at $1.7 trillion, making Aramco the most valuable listed company in the world, but fell short of the $2 trillion valuation aimed for by Mohammed. The company floated 1.5 percent of its stake on the Riyadh stock exchange, or Tadawul.

Initially priced at 32 riyals ($8.53), shares rose the maximum 10 percent to 35.2 riyals on Wednesday, giving Aramco a market value of around $1.88 trillion, Reuters reported, surpassing Apple who made history when it became the first $1 trillion publicly traded company.

More than 80 percent of the stake sale was bought by Saudi buyers, Reuters reported, following lukewarm interest from international investors. Saudi Arabia was shunned by some financial institutions for a brief period of time following the brutal murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, who was killed in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul as a result of his criticism of Mohammed.