Putting words in his mouth

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/life/Putting-words-in-his-mouth-30291599.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

2

The ranking of a Thai in third place in the World Scrabble Championships comes as a surprise to everyone except the champ himself

It’s rare that the World Scrabble Calendar makes it to the newspapers, never mind the front page, but the recent release of the World’s English-Language Scrabble Players Association’s rankings made the headlines after Komol Panyasophonlert – a “Thai with no English” – was crowned the world’s number three player.

After completing 1,058 games across the globe throughout the course of eight years, the 31 year-old programmer from Bangkok gained the average score of 434.68 and took the number three spot on the list. Foreign news agencies were quick to pick up on the story, writing features about the Thai wordsmith and portraying him as a winner who “speaks no English”.

Our interest was piqued so we sat down for a chat with Komol to learn more about his latest achievement.

//

How did you get to become the number three in the Wespa World Scrabble Championship?

Actually it’s a rating system and not a one-off world final like most people think. You go to several competitions and your scores are accumulated along the way then calculated and ranked. They have to be big international events with awards up to US$2,500 (Bt87,500) or more for the scores to be eligible for the ranking. I did well at my last competition in Cape Town in February, and that got me to number three. I’ve been collecting my scores for eight years now, and I’ve been to many international events. My next event might cost me my title and send me to a lower position. You never know. Positions change all the time in this kind of competition.

Is this your highest ranking?

No. I was the world’s number two in 2013. And two Thai players have made it to the number one position – Panupol Sujjayakorn in 2003 and Pakorn Nemitrmansuk in 2009. Thailand is no stranger to international Scrabble matches and there are many more avid Thai players than most people realise.

How come we didn’t hear about you in 2013?

I don’t really know [laughs]. I didn’t do it for fame or anything. It’s more like a personal challenge and the constant battle to get better and better. This year I drew the attention of the press with several international news articles describing me as a Scrabble winner who speaks no English, and that’s how the sensationalism started.

Would you say you speak no English at all?

I speak English. I can communicate in English well enough, but my spoken English is not all that fluent because I don’t really use it much in daily life. The speculation started when an English media outlet sent me a Facebook message asking for an interview after the rating result. I told him I would prefer to converse via Facebook messenger because it felt more comfortable. After I sent him the answers, he assumed I had used Google Translate and broke the news to the entire world, because he thought I’d avoided talking to him and chose to write instead. My writing is not flawless, but it’s not that bad and it definitely not something that has been through Google Translate. Soon everyone wanted to talk to me and to ask how I had managed to win without knowing any English.

Were you upset?

I was. Now everyone, including friends at work and people I know, think I know zero English. It’s not that I’m very eloquent, but saying I know no English at all is an exaggeration. I earned a degree in communication arts from Chulalongkorn University and I’ve worked as copywriter for DTAC for four years, which required me to use written English extensively.

Would it be possible to be very good at Scrabble with no knowledge of the language at all?

It would be very, very difficult, but yes, I guess it’s possible. Scrabble is all about memory and strategy. You don’t need to be a great linguist to excel in the game, but knowing the language helps at lot. You can remember one word, but if you know how the language works, you can extend that same word to make several others. For example, make it into an adjective or an adverb and know if it’s correct or not to put “ing” behind it. It’s like some words take an “s” for the plural while others take “es” so it’s important to know those two. These are tricks that can complement your memorisation skills and expand your vocabulary vault without having to remember every single word at random.

How do you train? One feature said you read the dictionary for six hours every day.

I don’t have six hours to read a dictionary every day [laughs]. I have to work like everyone else! Nobody reads a dictionary to play Scrabble – it’s a waste of time. I use computer software like Lexpert, Collins Zyzzyva and several others to suggest frequently used words in Scrabble. There are two-letter words up to 20-letter words in English, and ones you normally need are between two to eight letters. That’s quite a lot, but it’s still not the whole dictionary. The grid is only 15 by 15, so you don’t really need words that are longer than 15 letters. And like I said, you can always build long words from what you already have.

Also, I practice with an anagram tool on computer. The software randomly gives me a set of letters and I need to construct as many words as I can from these letters in the shortest time possible. I play Scrabble a lot with computer software and it’s a good way to practise because the computer always wins. You can play online with other players, too. I normally train one hour every day, maybe up to three if I am preparing for a competition.

Do you know the meanings of all the words in your head?

To be honest, no. There are words that you know the meaning of and others that nobody uses in real life – words that are mentioned mainly in Scrabble games. And I don’t know the meanings of those.

Does training for Scrabble help with your English at all?

Not directly. You don’t learn the language by knowing just words, but it does help me to be more familiar with the English language and makes it less foreign or scary. It pushes me to learn more about how words are used and what meanings and connotations they have that I may not know. I read a lot of pocket books in English.

It seems you were not a fan of English classes.

No, not at all. I did okay in school and my grades in English language were okay but I wasn’t top of the English class. I was more into maths, and a bit of a nerd. When I was in Matthayom 1, I was in a game club and did very well at the 24 maths game, where you had to manipulate four numbers to get 24 as the result. Then I moved on to A-math, which was also a math game but with a similar grid layout to Scrabble. I saw the similarity and thought, “why not?” I started playing Scrabble in Matthayom 2 and haven’t stopped.

What it is about Scrabble that appeals to you so much?

It’s fun! I can’t describe it but it suits me very well. I’m a nerd, I admit it, and I like spending time on my own, doing my own thing. Scrabble is a perfect game for me. Also, the prize money from big competitions is quite attractive – I’m not going to lie. So it’s a win-win hobby for me.

What’s your strength as a Scrabble player?

I don’t have the biggest word bank in my head, and clearly my English is not excellent. But I am good at balancing every aspect of the game to secure a high score. Scrabble is mainly about strategy, so you have to plan and execute it well within your 25-minute time slot. I don’t just think about how to construct words, but also how to get more points from what I have, how to block the opponent from gaining more points, how to increase my opportunity and so forth. Everything has to go together.

What advice do you have for beginners?

Start small. Go for two to three letter words first, and then build up. Use the computer software to help you find words that you need to know, or just Google for most found Scrabble words and start from there. And like most things, practise makes perfect.

 

THE OGRE with a heart of gold

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/life/THE-OGRE-with-a-heart-of-gold-30288317.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Looking for new kingdoms to conquer, Shrek will be surveying Thailand next month.

YOU HAVEN’T QUITE had the full theatre experience until you’ve seem a giant green ogre stomping across the stage. Well, get the kids ready, because “Shrek the Musical” is coming to Bangkok next month.

The stage show’s first international tour will be pulling into the Muangthai Rachadalai Theatre for eight performances, daytime and evenings, from July 1 to 5.

Drawn from the blockbuster 2001 DreamWorks animated film “Shrek” and the franchise it spawned, the musical debuted on Broadway in 2008 and turned into a globetrotting production last year.

If you’ve seen the movies, you know what kind of bizarre things can happen in a faraway kingdom when a beast rescues a beauty with the help of a loudmouthed donkey. The Shrek fantasy also has a villain with a short temper – common enough – but it’s otherwise packed with fairytale misfits, the better to find out what really makes a hero.

//

Offering some delightful hints at what’s in store are American actors Kyle Timson, who plays Shrek, and Lindsay Estelle Dunn, who has the role of Princess Fiona.

HOW DID YOU GET INVOLVED IN THIS PRODUCTION?

Dunn: When I saw it on Broadway I thought it was a role I could definitely play. And I’ve loved “Shrek” ever since the first movie came out. I was eight years old and obsessed with the story! So when I found out they were making a musical, I was really excited.

Timson: Being part of the international production is truly one of the greatest moments of my life, an opportunity to play a dream role, to see the world, to bring the musical theatre art form to countries where there isn’t any.

HAVE YOU ALWAYS DONE THEATRE?

Dunn: I’ve been doing theatre my whole life. I could sing before I could talk and dance before I could walk! I got a BA in musical-theatre performance.

Timson: I’ve been performing since I was in kindergarten. I just recently earned my degree in musical theatre and then did a musical production of “The Wedding Singer” in Virginia for four months.

HOW ARE THE BROADWAY AND TOURING VERSIONS OF “SHREK” DIFFERENT?

Timson: We have a slightly revamped set for the road, with a 10-by-six-metre video wall to project the backdrops instead of the painted drops used on Broadway. The video wall is cool because the scenery moves – the clouds move and the sun sets while we’re performing. And there are a lot of sunrises and sunsets in the show because Fiona turns back into an ogre at night, so it’s a really cool and realistic element.

Dunn: The script has also been improved a little. Everything is completely up to date and brand new, including the costumes.

WEARING SHREK’S COSTUME LOOKS LIKE A LOT OF WORK.

Timson: Physically it’s very rigorous. It’s a fat suit and the boots have four-inch lifts to give me the ogre size. Underneath Shrek’s shirt and pants I’m wearing a padded jumpsuit. The whole costume weighs about 15 kilograms.

I also wear makeup that combines prosthetics and a helmet that and gives me the Shrek ears. The prosthetic is glued to my face and all over the helmet to create the whole Shrek head. I also wear green gloves. So when the whole thing is done only my eyeballs and teeth show!

IT MUST BE DIFFICULT MOVING AROUND?

Timson: I can actually move all right. I only do a tiny bit of dancing because my movement is restricted, but I do walk a lot. The most restricting thing is the head. I can’t really turn my head, so I have to turn my whole body. It just becomes the physicality of the show – you get used to it.

WHAT ABOUT PRINCESS FIONA’S COSTUME?

Dunn: I change into the ogre twice during the show. I have about three minutes to go from princess to ogre, when I also have to wear a fat suit and the helmet like Kyle does, plus a wig and an ogre nose. At the end of the show I do a fast transformation – everything has to be done in 45 seconds. It’s crazy!

IS THERE ANYTHING EVEN MORE CHALLENGING?

Dunn: For me it’s this one scene at the beginning of Act 2. I come onstage by myself and sing a solo and then the ensemble joins me for another five-minute scene where I sing and dance. It’s very taxing physically. And of course sometimes the costume malfunctions!

WHAT DO YOU LIKE MOST ABOUT YOUR CHARACTERS?

Dunn: Fiona isn’t your typical princess. She’s a bit of a tomboy, feisty and down to earth. She’s not afraid to say no.

Timson: Growing up as a theatre kid in middle school and high school isn’t the most popular choice. And I was also a bigger kid, so I was always bullied a bit by the “cool” kids. So I definitely connect with Shrek.

Shrek has a different set of problems, but they’re cartoon versions of problems that everyone has. Everyone has something about themselves they think isn’t cool. The real beauty in Shrek is that he goes out on this adventure and realises that, somewhere out there, you’ll find someone who accepts you and loves you.

Here with the company it feels like that to me – to be surrounded by 51 people who are like me and have great passion for musical theatre.

DO YOU THINK THIS IS A SHOW EVERYONE WOULD ENJOY?

Dunn: It’s honestly for everyone. Kids love it, of course, but there are also some adult elements and jokes that would fly over a lot of the kids’ heads.

FAIRYTALE FOLLIES

“Shrek the Musical” runs from July 1 to 15 at the Muangthai Rachadalai Theatre. It’s in English with Thai surtitles.

Seats cost Bt1,500 to Bt4,500. For details, check http://www.ThaiTicketMajor.com and http://www.BECTero.com.

 

Tawan, the bashful beauty

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/life/Tawan-the-bashful-beauty-30287745.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

pic

Asia’s new top model Jiratchaya Kedkong talks about competing in the television reality show and her hopes for the future

Jiratchaya “Tawan” Kedkong certainly didn’t have it easy as she competed against 13 other supermodels from around the region, all of them determined to be crowned Asia’s Next Top Model. Indeed, she found herself in the bottom two twice and was almost eliminated but somehow struggled through the hard times to become the least expected winner.

Tawan walks away from the fourth season of the show with a brand new Subaru and a contract with Storm Agency in London, one of the world’s most prestigious modelling agencies with whom she will begin her career in earnest.

Born and raised in Lop Buri, 20-year-old Tawan is 177 centimetres tall and armed with a gentle disposition but a surprisingly strong will. She also has that spcial “something”, an indefinable quality that won over the supermodels Kelly Tandiono from Indonesia and Cindy Bishop from Thailand as well as globally renowned Taiwanese-born photographer Yu Tsai to become the second Thai model to snatch the crown, after Jessica Amornkuldilok, who was crowned at the end of cycle one.

We had a chat with the top model.

How did you start modelling?

I started when I was about 18, which is only two years ago. I’ve always been tall, which I inherit from my dad’s side of the family, and I’ve always liked fashion, though being a professional model never crossed my mind until after I graduated from high school. My family had quite a serious financial problem at the time and I decided to skip college and work. That’s when I came to Bangkok and tried my luck at modelling.

Was it hard to find modelling jobs?

Yes it was, at least at first because I was starting from zero and knew no one. I entered a few modelling contests and although I didn’t won any titles, I made connections on the modelling circuit. One thing led to another and before I knew it, I was modelling in Hong Kong for six months. I then went on to Singapore when I heard about Asia’s Next Top Model, which is based in there, and decided to enter the competition just for fun. Looking back, things worked out really well for me and I feel really fortunate. I’m also very lucky to have the full support of my parents in pursuing a career in modelling.

I was shocked but of course thrilled when I was picked for the show where I would be competing with 13 other girls. I didn’t have a lot of experience as a model, my English was not very good and I have very little confidence. But then, what did I have to lose? I didn’t expect to win at all. I just wanted to get out there and be seen as I thought it would benefit my modelling career.

Was the drama in the show scripted?

No. I was surprised to find that, too. You have to understand when you have a dozen girls who don’t know each other, come from different backgrounds and different cultures, nasty things are bound to happen. The show captured the little moments, and built up the drama for effect. It’s not really my thing, or my strategy, so I tried to stay clear of all the messiness and focus on doing better in the challenges.

Do you find it really stressful in that top model apartment?

Oh yes, very! I missed speaking Thai. We were not allowed to use the phone, Internet, watch TV or read newspapers and the challenges were on every other day. There was always a lot to do, many challenges to tackle and too little time to prepare. I made some friends that I still keep in touch with. But just as I thought I had found solace in these new friends, they were eliminated, which made it even more stressful for me. I just wanted to run off to the forest and scream my head off. It was a really intense but rewarding experience.

The judges often criticised you for being too shy and reserved. Was that one of the major challenges for you to overcome?

Yes. I’ve always been easy-going and goofy, unlike many of the girls who have more of a Western attitude, you know, fierce, strong and insanely confident. I’m not like that, and I don’t think I need to be like them. I did the best I could, though, to speak up and speak out about how I feel and what I want. That is probably the biggest thing I have taken away from the show.

So how did a shy girl win the fierce competition?

I did my best and delivered what was required of me in each challenge. When I’m in a shoot, I’m always serious and try my best to give them what they want, whether it’s the customers or the judges. I may not be a fierce, super-confident supermodel but I’m versatile in my modelling style. I can be pretty, I can be chic, I can be cool – anything you want me to be. Also, I didn’t give up. I proved to the judges that I took note of their comments and seriously tried to do better. I’m shy but I’m not a quitter.

What are you planning next?

I hope to secure some good modelling deals that really fulfil my dream, and go as far as I can in this industry. Maybe I will go back to school and earn a degree, but right now I would like to savour my title, make the best of it and focus on my career.

Paiboon promises to resolve political deadlock with new ‘Smart’ party

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Paiboon-promises-to-resolve-political-deadlock-wit-30292950.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Paiboon

Paiboon

FORESEEING parliamentary turmoil after the next general election, a pro-military figure has positioned himself as a “white knight” to help to unwind the political deadlock with a new political party.

Former charter drafter Paiboon Nititawan recently made headlines after his decision to create the People’s Reform Party, which would pave the way for Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha to become premier again.

Paiboon, also a former member of the now-defunct National Reform Council (NRC), said the party would promote “a good guy” rather than “a dirty politician”, and the best man in his judgement wasPrayut.

“With his great contributions, Prayut is a super-giant star who is embraced by the people and no one is comparable to him,” he said.

The new party was announced after Paiboon said he realised that a large number of people favoured the general, judging from the charter referendum results. More than 61.35 per cent voted for the draft charter and 58.07 per cent approved the additional question about allowing senators to join MPs in choosing a prime minister.

“Over 16 million people found the draft charter acceptable, and for the second question, 15 million agreed to have the 250 senators join MPs in selecting a prime minister. This means that people want to see national reform in line with Prayut‘s plan and that they support the general.”

The voters who accepted both questions would be the party’s core constituency, Paiboon said, adding that in late 2014, while he was an NRC member, he had proposed that the Senate should join MPs in picking a premier.

In mid-2015, while working on a draft charter as part of a committee led by Borwornsak Uwanno, Paiboon proposed an extra question – asking if people wanted a two-year national reform period before the next election – to be included in the charter referendum.

With the “Yes” result of the recent referendum, Paiboon said he was sure that millions of people shared his ideology, wishing to see the country move forward under the new charter and have an unelected prime minister.

Under the approved draft, each party is expected to submit the names of three candidates for the premier’s post to the Election Commission (EC) before the election. If no candidate on the lists gains a majority vote in the 500-seat House of Representatives, then half of the House can call on the Parliament president to convene a Senate-House meeting to drop the candidate lists.

Then, Paiboon said, the House and the Senate would jointly select a suitable outsider to be premier as specified by the additional question approved in the referendum.

Paiboon said he did not expect any of the listed candidates would win a majority vote in the Lower House, and in the resulting deadlock his party would push for Prayut to serve a second term as premier.

He said that there were two possible scenarios if there is deadlock. First, he said, a major party likePheu Thai or the Democrat Party could cooperate with small and medium-sized parties to choosePrayut as prime minister. Second, the two major parties and a medium party could join forces to either select Prayut or another suitable outsider.

Paiboon said his party would not submit a list of candidates because he wanted to show that the party only supports Prayut.

He also insisted that it would not be a military party set up specifically to promote the general, but instead it would be a political tool for people who wanted to fight corruption.

“Previously, people who were disgusted by graft and disliked irresponsible politicians had no choices, so they selected those who were ‘least evil’. But now people will have this alternative party, which will use people’s power in Parliament to counterbalance bad politicians,” he said.

He added that the party would welcome people who shared the same ideology, and those who wanted to join should have accepted the draft and the additional question in last Sunday’s referendum. Also, he said, members should accept three key missions: reforming “dirty” politics and politicians by pushing for “a good” leader, or Prayut, to hold the top post; reforming religion; and promoting an inclusive checks-and-balances mechanism.

He said the party would send candidates to all 350 constituencies in the next election including some new faces. Admitting that there was a possibility that retired military officers would join the party, he said veteran politicians and retired officers were qualified people.

Paiboon said the party would not offer “populist” policies, adding that the charter and the 20-year national strategic plan would ease the next government’s work rather than obstructing it as many politicians fear.

“The powers-that-be will not write a plan that will bar them, because one day they could be the ones who run the country under that plan,” he said.

Paiboon said he was not the party leader, as the post had not been filled because the party had not yet been officially registered due to the junta’s ban on political activities. He added that the party would be a sort of association, in which members would be volunteers. Funds would come from activities and donations once the party is registered, he said. “We do not need financiers because the party is not an enterprise. We don’t need a large sum of money like other political parties.”

With the slogan of “Smart Party”, Paiboon said the organisation would communicate and campaign via social media, adding that all members would have to be “trendy” and come from the middle-class.

Battle to preserve country’s natural resources for better equality

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Battle-to-preserve-countrys-natural-resources-for–30292890.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

pic

Natural Resources and Environment Minister General Surasak Kanchanarat has transformed the government’s intention into an ambitious plan to steer reform of the country’s management of natural resources, which includes the forest sector. He talked to The Nation’s Piyaporn Wongruang about his reform policy and plan, and what would be achieved if they were successfully implemented.

IT SEEMS NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IS ALSO GOING THROUGH MAJOR REFORM LIKE OTHER SECTORS AS YOU ARE WORKING ON THE STRATEGIC-REFORM STEERING PLAN FOR NATURAL RESOURCES. IS THIS THE RESULT OF YOUR CONCLUSION BASED ON YOUR LENGTHY EXPERIENCE IN REFORM WORK?

When we, the NCPO [National Council for Peace and Order], first arrived in politics, our work was divided and, yes, I helped take care of the reform work. This is partly because I had worked extensively with the civil sector and thus had experience in dealing with politics while I was at the Defence Ministry.

If you remember, the 11 prime reform agendas were from us, the Defence Ministry. We had invited people as well as politicians to talk with us to see what areas they wanted to reform before developing the proposals, which were then forwarded to the NRC (National Reform Council).

Following our meetings, we came up with the conclusion that we wished to see corruption, bureaucratic administration, and in particular politics reformed the most. However, this had something to do with the fundamental problem that we had, which was inequity – where decentralisation of power and access to resources was needed.

It was impossible for the country to move on with wealth being in the hands of a few like this. We needed redistribution of wealth so that we can get out of this trap. That’s the reason why reforming natural resources management was one of its [the junta’s] top agendas.

SO, IT [NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT REFORM) HAS BEEN PART OF THE GOVERNMENT’S AGENDA FROM THE BEGINNING. HOW DID YOU TRANSLATE THIS INTO POLICY?

To help reduce inequity via natural resources management, we have a critical challenge, which is how we can access the resources equally while using them in a sustainable manner so that we will not cause any impact on the resources that are actually part of the public domain.

So, I looked at this challenge two dimensionally and transformed them into my key policies or missions to accomplish at the ministry and to respond to the government’s intention. First, it’s about conservation as fundamentally natural resources are part of the public domain. And second, it’s about how to use it in a sustainable manner to strike a balance between conservation, sustainable uses, and last but not least, equal access to these resources or equity.

That was where I started before rearranging the work at the ministry and dividing it into four main sub-groups, ranging from natural resources, under which forests and land are under, to water resources, environmental management, and administration.

IT SEEMS THE NCPO AND GOVERNMENT GAVE IMPORTANCE TO FOREST AND LAND PROBLEMS, AS IT IMMEDIATELY ISSUED AT LEAST TWO ORDERS TO TACKLE IT. ON YOUR SIDE, HOW HAVE YOU BEEN WORKING ON THIS?

To come up with a solution, we had to learn the situation first. You may know that our forests have long and extensively been encroached upon, but I can say that after the NCPO took office the recent results of satellite data have shown that the rate of encroachment has ceased.

People with selfishness are definitely part of the problem but we cannot blame them alone. There are actually some other factors, which have contributed to the problem. These are flaws in our regulations and concerned agencies, as well as a degree of public awareness and cooperation.

So, it needs quite a holistic approach and that’s the reason why we are developing that strategic plan under which our forests will be re-managed with clear goals set in line with the government’s strategic 20-year plan.

WHAT IS THE PLAN ABOUT?

The plan lined up strategies and measures for all natural resources plus the goals for every five years until 2035. In the past, we didn’t have such a long-term plan to guide our work direction. It’s largely about politics and cronyism. With such a framework, although it was still corrupted, we trust that they will not be able to do that much. But more importantly, they must follow it [the plan] and accomplish it as this comes with the goals they must be accountable for.

For our forests, we need to review what we want to achieve and how to get there. Forest experts have agreed that the country needs forest areas up to 49 per cent [of the country] in the next 20 years. So we have set the target. To increase the pristine forest area at present, which is around 32 per cent [of the country], we need around 25 million rai [four million hectares] more.

The main obstacle is we still have unsettled conflicts with people living in the forests. So, we have decided to reinterpret the definition [of our approach to the issue] and introduce “green areas” by including more of other types of forests, including community forests, which will be more flexible for co-living to help reduce the conflicts, as well as introduce |green zones in big cities, and forest plantations. This will result in some regulations being amended or enacted to facilitate growth, as we believe that this can help reduce disturbances in pristine forest areas we want to protect.

WHAT IS YOUR POLICY OR DIRECTION ON THIS THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN TO CONCERNED AGENCIES?

Actually, if we look at our remaining forests, they are not to bad and still carry some hopes. But I have emphasised three main measures that I have assigned to concerned agencies. They are prevention and suppression, restoration, and public awareness encouragement. And all these three measures need to be done together.

However, you may be aware that there has been extensive work on forest suppression going on at the moment.

We have certain agencies, which are the Parks Department and the Royal Forestry Department, that are principally responsible for this. But as the work is quite tough and risky, often the authorities feel that they have wasted their time and energies. I would like to ask the public for some understanding. Imagine they arrested influential figures. Their lives could be at risk. On the other hand, if they arrested the poor, they face public denouncement. Either way is painful.

We have tried to step up measures so they can deal with the issues better. I have given a clear directive for law enforcement. The authorities from now on cannot only just enforce laws but they need to apply a sort of political science approach when dealing with the issues. The new Pracharat Pitak Pa ( People’s State for Forest Protection) has been set up to train them about this. They don’t have to arrest every one, but negotiations first can be carried out to reduce confrontations and pressure.

However, we have realised that there are influential figures out there and we have focused our law enforcement on this group. To deal with them better, we have set up sort of central suppression units, be they the Phayak Prai of the RFD, the Phaya Sua of the Parks Department, and the White Sharks of the Marine Resources Department, to step up our forest suppression efforts. They are assigned to target big fish nationwide.

But I have instructed them not to forget that we want to take our encroached forests back via legal means, not engaging in a war against any one. Some sort of combat is not necessary if negotiations help.

WHAT ABOUT STRUCTURAL REFORM FOR THE WORK – IS IT STILL NEEDED?

Some existing laws may need some amendment and we have done so to some extent. For instance, the Forestry Act that we have just amended will not let department chiefs authorise use of forest reserves any more, as we don’ believe in such a sole consideration. It will from now on fall under a committee’s authority instead. Other acts are also in the pipeline including the Wildlife Act, the National Park Acts, and so on.

Meanwhile, organisations’ work structures are also under consideration to improve performances. Some of their units may be merged to reduce work overlapping, but I cannot reveal which ones at this point as it’s quite sensitive

However, the operations and implementations in several areas have been overhauled for more effectiveness and transparency with the ultimate goal to strike a balance. For instance, we have overhauled the fee collection in several marine parks in the South, resulting in a jump in state income while we will not hesitate closing some other areas when experts tell us that they are under risk of heavy tourism

AS YOU HAVE DONE ALL THIS, ESPECIALLY YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN, HOW CAN YOU ENSURE THAT IT WILL BE CONTINUOUSLY CARRIED OUT BY THE NEXT GOVERNMENT WHEN YOU ARE GONE?

I myself have been trying to boost morale and courage my men first because if they are aware of their work and duty, I believe that they will help carry it on.

But at the end, it’s about law enactment that will result in real effect and commitment to anyone that follows, as well as public awareness so people realise that their natural resources are precious and should be preserved.

Thai Union banks on its innovation initiative

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/business/Thai-Union-banks-on-its-innovation-initiative-30288564.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Thiraphong Chansiri

Thiraphong Chansiri

THAI UNION GROUP, one of the world’s largest seafood companies, targets its global innovation initiative contributing 10 per cent or US$800 million (Bt28.2 billion) of its sales by 2020, said its chief executive, Thiraphong Chansiri.

Thai Union’s boss said that growing innovation revenue from virtually zero at present to $800 million in the next four and a half years was achievable, as the group could leverage its strong brands in every region to introduce new products developed from its Global Innovation Incubator (Gii).

“What makes us different from others is that we have our own leading brands in all regions. We can leverage our strengths in most countries to bring innovations to the markets,” Thiraphong said during an interview with The Nation last week.

Thanks partly to the mergers and acquisitions (M&As) that the company had pursued during the past several years, it currently owns a portfolio of canned seafood brands that are in the top three of their respective markets, such as Chicken of the Sea in the US, John West in the UK, Petit Navire in France, Mareblu in Italy, and Sealect and Fisho in Thailand.

Thai Union expects to see significant results from its Gii from next year, although the first new product launch from the centre is due for the final quarter of this year.

//

“The years 2017 to 2018 are going to be critical to see whether it [Gii] delivers positive, solid results,” he said.

Thai Union is committed to its goal of achieving $8 billion in annual revenue by 2020, despite the recent aborted takeover of Bumble Bee Foods in the US, which had in effect shed $1 billion from the target.

The group now needs to grow by at least 15 per cent annually during the next four and a half years to achieve the 2020 sales target, the CEO said.

“Even after failing with Bumble Bee, we remain committed [to the $8-billion target] because we believe we still have upside potential. It’s not easy, but having an easy target is not our job,” he added.

To partly offset the revenue shortfall from the aborted Bumble Bee deal, Thiraphong explained that Thai Union had come up with three new initiatives that added to its original organic-growth plan plus innovation and M&A strategies, namely, the global food service channel; emerging markets; and marine ingredients business.

Moreover, the $8-billion top-line growth target is only part of Thai Union’s key financial goals for 2020, which also include a gross profit margin of more than 20 per cent and a net margin of 6 per cent or more, he said.

Gross margin is currently about 16-17 per cent, while net margin is 4.5 per cent.

“It’s not only about the top line. It’s also about margin improvement,” he said, adding that innovations will play a critical role in the group’s shift in direction toward high-value businesses. Despite heavy international attacks on the Thai fishing industry with regard to sustainability and labour issues over the last 12-18 months, Thai Union continued to show strong financial results last year and in the first quarter of 2016, and keeps winning a vote of confidence from investors, customers and suppliers, he said.

The group recently won five out of six awards – Best CEO, Best at Investor Relations, Best Managed Company, Most Committed to Corporate Governance, and Best Corporate Social Responsibility – that FinanceAsia magazine gave to large Thai companies in its 2016 poll. “These awards were rated by investors, so that is why we are quite pleased with all these awards, which demonstrate the confidence and trust that investors have in us. If you [just] looked at the news, we should not have been awarded. We have been in the wrong industry in the last 18 months,” the chief executive said.

“I will try to work with Greenpeace. It’s a challenge, but we are always open to all suggestions because we want to do the right things,” he added.

 

KITTIES in the doghouse

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/life/KITTIES-in-the-doghouse-30283483.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Animal Planet’s “Cat Daddy” Jackson Galaxy purrs about his love feisty felines

JACKSON GALAXY, aka “the Cat Daddy”, is back to save the day with the seventh season of Animal Planet’s hit show, “My Cat From Hell”.

Armed with more than 20 years’ experience and proven training techniques honed from his work with more than 25,000 animals, the New York native cat behaviourist travels across the US to assist cat owners in need of some intervention in dealing with their furry – and sometimes feisty – companions. The aim is to prevent owners from giving up their cats and contributing to already overcrowded shelters.

Galaxy took time out from a busy schedule during his recent promotion visit to Bangkok to sit down and chat with us.

//

HOW DID YOU START WORKING WITH CATS?

I didn’t have a lot of experiences with cats before I started working in animal shelter in 1993 to make ends meet besides playing rock music, and basically the cats and I got along. Back then we were putting down a lot of cats in that shelter and most of the time that was for very simple reasons. I found that I could help change that and saved a lot of cats. I did that for about 10 years and started going to people’s homes while I was also working in the shelter, and it just progressed from there.

HOW DID THE SHOW START? HOW DID YOU COME UP WITH THE NAME “MY CAT FROM HELL”?

That wasn’t me! I think the original name of the show was “Cat Daddy”, and they went with “Hell Cat” for a minute. The fear was that nobody was going watch the show about cats, so they felt they had to make it a little more dramatic, which worked. When they first came up with the name “My Cat From Hell”, I freaked because I come from an animal rescue world, and I thought all my friends would disown me. But everyone got it. It doesn’t take long to realise that it’s not the cat that is from hell; it’s either the people or the circumstances and that’s only thing I care about. Animal Planet has always been sensitive about my approach to cats, and they’re very supportive.

Weeks after I moved to Los Angeles in 2007, my friend who works in TV took me to an adoption event. And I was standing around with a bunch of cats. One person talked to another and the show was created just like that. Luckily I never had to shop for the show, it came to me and it happened very quickly.

HOW LONG DOES A CASE NORMALLY TAKE YOU?

About six weeks. I to a house, talk to the humans, try to spend some time with the cat, which is tough when you got a camera crew, try to get a handle on what’s going on, then I give them homework. That’s the most important. When I tell you to do something with your cat, it’s going to take you a few weeks to implement it for the cat to respond, and to know from that point where we’d go. I don’t think I can do it in three weeks, because cats don’t care about pleasing humans at all and you really have to get that work in to gain trust before you can get results.

HOW DO YOU CHOOSE THE CATS FOR THE SHOW?

There’s a combination of things that come into play, because I can’t go see them all. I tend to pick the ones that are challenging to me, or with circumstances that are really dire. My producers will tend to pick ones that are more humorous. And now for season seven, I want to show people who have cats solutions to things that we never addressed before.

A LOT OF THEM ARE SERIOUSLY AGGRESSIVE.

It always worries me that people will watch my show and assume that all cats are aggressive. Cats stay alive in the wild for thousands of years because they know how not to pick a fight. They know when to run and hide. They only attack when they feel threatened. The aggression you see on the show is a very small part of the cat population. A lot of the cats I work with have this sort of complex where they feel the sky is falling down, and they’re being attacked all the time, and so they act out. But I promise you that there is not a cat that I know that would just walk up to us in a strange room and lash out. They have to feel threatened to attack.

WHAT HAS BEEN YOUR MOST CHALLENGING CASE SO FAR?

There is one case in the fifth season where a couple in Portland had to call the police because the cat had trapped them in their bedroom. That cat by far is the most challenging, and he is also mentally sick. I met him and it was like a soul mate moment where I loved him from the beginning. But he was the most impossible cat. Every time we thought we had a happy ending, I would get a phone call that he had mauled somebody and fly back. After we’d finished filming the show, we found him a new home. A week later I received a phone call telling me that Lux had sent someone the hospital again. I still work with him and he taught me so much. Lux is much happier than he was, but he’s still troubled.

DO YOU THINK PEOPLE UNDERSTAND CATS MORE AND BECOME CAT OWNERS BECAUSE OF YOUR SHOW?

The whole cat culture has grown or at least come out into the open. I mean, now you can put a video of your cat on YouTube and get 75 million views. There are a lot of cat lovers out there, and there are more cats in homes now than there are dogs. For so long, people, and especially men, were very quiet about their cats, but that’s not true anymore. I’ve told people to Instagram themselves and their cats, and get the message out that the felines are not the sole preserve of “crazy cat ladies” who live alone in the basement, covered in cat hair and never leave the house. You’d be surprised how hip and young cat people are now. We cast the show that way, too, to include young people and make sure that the stereotypes are gone. I’m very proud that we helped bring cats into the light a little bit, and opened up a perception of what a cat person is really like.

WHAT CAN WE EXPECT FROM THE SEVENTH SEASON?

We’ll have a lot of new angles. We have a new segment of the show called “My Cat From Heaven” where we highlight cats who perform functions or have survived certain odds. And you’ll get to see more of animal rescue and animal advocacy, which is pretty what I do all my life, other than going to people’s homes.

CAT VIDEOS

Season 7 of “My Cat From Hell” premieres at 8pm on April 20 on Animal Planet, TrueVisions channel 567.

Find out more at JacksonGalaxy.com.

 

Abhisit urges NCPO to ‘step back’ on vote

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Abhisit-urges-NCPO-to-step-back-on-vote-30289742.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva

Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva

As a politician, Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva keeps working despite restrictions placed by the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO).

Apart from sharing his views about the charter content, which could determine the country’s future after the upcoming referendum, Abhisit also voices concern on the referendum process, seen as a crucial factor for future peace and order.

He talked to The Nation’s Piyaporn Wongruang during a recent group interview with Nation Group’s news editors on the newspaper’s 45th anniversary.

AS THE REFERENDUM DRAWS NEAR, PEOPLE HAVE SAID THEY HAVE NOT YET SEEN A CLEAR STANCE FROM THE DEMOCRATS YET. HOW WOULD YOU EXPLAIN THIS?

To declare whether we will or will not accept the new charter is still an open question and it may be too early to do so. In my view, I still think the NCPO has a duty to inform people clearly what other options are there. We also believe the referendum process is not as democratic as it is supposed to be. At this point, people, even the media themselves, are still afraid of saying things.

On the other hand, state mechanisms are taking a leading role in disseminating information, which in my view is very different than international standards and principles of arranging a referendum.

What would happen is this: If the charter passes the referendum, the process will be used as an excuse to reject it later. If it does not pass, the NCPO itself will be pressured to take responsibility for the failure.

The Democrats do not want to see either of these two scenarios. We want to see a charter pass the referendum with a consensus, and avoid chaos afterwards.

So, I want Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha to step back from where he is a bit. First of all, he should demonstrate clearly that he will give people an alternative to the charter draft, and let the matter be determined by the people, without influencing them by other means.

Secondly, he should pull back all state mechanisms to let the referendum be truly free and fair.

My point is that British Prime Minister David Cameron had to resign after being defeated at the polls. Why? Because he had turned himself from an organiser of the referendum to become a campaigner. The NCPO should not put itself into the same position. If the charter passes, it will become a source of conflict itself as people will say it was passed because of the NCPO’s power. But if it does not, will Prayut resign?

Either way would create a new conflict in society, so the Democrats wish to see the NCPO adjust its position on the matter first.

THE NCPO HAS CHOSEN NOT TO REVEAL ANY ALTERNATIVES TO THE CHARTER FOR NOW,

POSSIBLY BECAUSE THIS IS A CARD TO BE PLAYED AFTER THE REFERENDUM?

The point is the NCPO is not playing a card – you cannot play a card because you are responsible for the country’s fate. In fact, it is people’s right to know what is at stake before making a crucial decision for their lives. Do you want people to accept the charter and move on? How could you still keep a card hidden? This is not fair to the country as a whole and it’s not healthy for the NCPO’s goal to maintain peace and order.

If you really win in the referendum, how long will people still keep arguing about the poll results and its legitimacy? If that becomes the case, I think it’s a total failure of the NCPO. The country should be past such a conflict by now. We have wasted a lot of time already.

IS THIS BECAUSE THE NCPO WISHES TO SEE THE CHARTER PASS THE REFERENDUM?

All I can say is that is what people have understood. People are feeling like that at the moment.

That’s why I suggest the NCPO step back a bit. The interim charter gives them power to take control, even if the charter is not passed. By taking sides like this, what will happen if people vote down the charter? The NCPO’s power will be challenged tremendously.

DO YOU THINK THAT IT’S THE NCPO’S INTENTION TO GET THE CHARTER PASSED?

Whether it intends to or not, one thing for sure is that the ongoing referendum process is very unnatural. The NCPO claims that the process is just disseminating information, but do you think that it will just be that when people are being informed? If it’s just that, the NCPO would only read the content to people, but I don’t believe that it will be like that. The government has to explain reasons for the charter to voters, and in doing so, will people really be informed about weaknesses in the charter? You would rather tell voters about all the good things, right? So how can this process be neutral?

IS THIS A CRITICAL POINT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY?

I think it is. When the NCPO first took office, we noticed that we did not have a referendum. I remember that I wrote to warn that without a referendum, the charter would not be legitimate. There would always be some groups opposing the charter, saying it was just a product of the coup. That’s the reason why we need a referendum, which must also be free and fair so that people will accept the result.

Actually, I think our vote is much easier than Brexit. The challenge that we have is that when the charter was first drafted, we did not have public participation, and that’s why the charter faces an additional legitimacy challenge.

I think we have wasted a lot of time already, with 84 or 85 years on the road to democracy and 20 different charters written.

In this atmosphere, do you think many people will think that we will use this charter for a long time without it being amended or torn up again? Nobody has been able to answer that question yet. That’s the reason why the upcoming referendum has become crucial for us all, and it must be proceed correctly.

DO YOU THINK THE PROCESS CAN BE ADJUSTED IN TIME, GIVEN THAT WE HAVE ONLY ABOUT ONE MONTH LEFT?

We really need strong adjustment, adjustment by the NCPO and adjustment of people’s attitudes, to make the referendum free and fair enough for people to accept it.

Considering the period of two years in the office, I think the NCPO listens to criticisms to some extent and has adjusted itself.

But personally, given PM Prayut‘s reaction, I think it may be a bit difficult to discuss this matter. It’s really up to the NCPO’s judgement and assessment, whether or not it will listen this time and adjust what it’s doing.

HOW DO YOU FORESEE POLITICS AFTER THE |REFERENDUM THEN?

If the charter passes the referendum, we would move forward to an election as planned in the roadmap. But I really believe that the knots of new problems being created now will generate new conflict in society. We have already had conflict that is still unresolved, and we would have another problem added to it.

WHAT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR PARTY? ARE YOU STILL ITS LEADER?

There are rumours here and there, and I cannot answer any specific one. But what I can say is theDemocrat Party is a political party that is based on democratic principles.

We have certain rules and regulations to follow for the best of the people and the country, and do not stick to a single particular figure. I am still in charge, and doing my best. We are preparing and ready.

Article 61 ruling ‘crucial to rights’

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Article-61-ruling-crucial-to-rights-30289186.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Jon Ungpakorn, director of the Internet Law Reform Dialogue, centre, submits a petition through the Ombudsman’s Office asking the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of Article 61(2) of the referendum law.

Jon Ungpakorn, director of the Internet Law Reform Dialogue, centre, submits a petition through the Ombudsman’s Office asking the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of Article 61(2) of the referendum law.

ilaw director explains what is at stake in Wednesday’s decision

THE government has been accused of applying a heavy hand in restricting freedom of expression ahead of the referendum on August 7.

In response, human rights advocates and scholars have petitioned the Constitutional Court via the Ombudsman for a ruling whether the referendum’s key legal mechanism, Article 61 of the new referendum law, violates people’s rights as guaranteed under the interim constitution.

The court will rule on the issue on Wednesday.

Jon Ungpakorn – director of the Internet Law Reform Dialogue (iLaw) and a former senator who advocated human rights – is leading the campaign.

He spoke to The Nation’s Piyaporn Wongruang about why the group decided to file the petition and how important freedom of expression is for the country’ future.

Could you share with us the reasons why you decided to file the petition?

Our point is this: We are going to have one of the biggest decision-making processes, which is the referendum, on one of the most important issues of our lives, which is the new charter. The passage of the new charter this time means a lot to our future because it has been written in a way that is difficult to be amended, meaning anything written in there would be with us for a long period of time.

To decide on such an important matter, the referendum must be free and fair the most, meaning it must open every opportunity for people to learn about what is being decided first so that they can make an informed and independent decision on it.

That’s why freedom of expression, especially during the period of time ahead of the event, is particularly important.

Actually, this is a fundamental principle applied all over the world. You must know the topic first before you make a decision.

What problem do you see with Article 61 under the referendum law?

We think that there is something peculiar in the process. We view that Clause 2 of Article 61 restricts people’s rights to expression. Not only is it written in a vague manner, which is open to arbitrary enforcement, it also carries a very harsh penalty, which is even harsher than a sedition offence.

On the surface, it seems to carry no problem at all, but when we look into it we will see that the clause is indeed critically problematic.

So, we studied the present charter to see what we can do about this. And the charter allows us to file a petition via the Ombudsman with the Constitutional Court to rule on it. Or the other way, we must become the law offenders first and then we will be able to file the case to the court directly, which we think is not a good option. That’s the reason why we have filed the petition through the Ombudsman.

iLaw had consulted on the issue with those who have worked on promoting human rights, and a number of scholars and human rights advocates agreed with us. So, they decided to show their support to our petition.

What have you filed with the court to rule on?

What we have requested the court to do is rule on whether the clause in the article is constitutional. The Interim Charter guarantees people’s rights and liberty, which is also protected by other international obligations [the country has]. So we view that the clause of the article does violate the constitution as well as those obligations including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

(Article 4 of the provisional charter states that “all human dignity, rights, liberties and equality of the people protected by the constitutional convention, and by international obligations bound by Thailand, shall be protected and upheld by this Constitution”).

We have heard complaints about the restrictions as a result of this clause a lot. So we started to study those, including from social media, and brought the issue to our meeting before resolving to file the petition as we are an independent organisation promoting people’s rights to expression as well.

Don’t you think that the government’s claim of wanting to keep peace and order by enacting such a law is valid?

To claim social instability has been here for a long while. For example, the National Council for Peace and Order has claimed that without the NCPO, there would be violence erupting. But in my view, I cannot really see any signs that people would come and fight against one another any more.

On a contrary, we seem to see people on the opposite camps joining hands and wishing to have the NCPO out of office as soon as possible. So, it’s really groundless to claim the existence [of simmering conflict] and the need to restrict people’s rights. Those in power must come up with a more rational justification to stay [in power], rather than keep claiming this reason.

In fact, if we look back to what happened before the May 22 coup, we would be able to see that there was actually not a great number of people coming out and killing one another as claimed. Of course, there was violence, but I would rather blame the state mechanisms for failing to prevent such violence erupting. They had failed to function properly in a time like that until the coup took place, unfortunately. At this point, I find no reasons for the state’s claims any more.

What do you expect to hear from this case the most?

We just want people not to be afraid to speak their minds. If you have noticed, we have been threatened by state authorities almost every day. That is the equivalent to shutting people’s mouths. It’s actually not only about this clause, there are several other regulations that follow.

They are written in a similarly vague manner. See a referendum campaign as an example. Up until now, is anyone clear whether we can run such a campaign? While the state is apparently able to do so by sending volunteers out to meet people and tell them about the charter and its benefits, other groups who tell people not to accept it are arrested. So, is this called fairness?

In fact, with or without Article 61’s Clause 2, it’s already not fair because we actually face a number of regulations. The clause just makes the mouth gagging worse.

What would you like to hear from the court?

It’s sort of a test. Legally speaking, if the court does rule that the clause violates the charter, the referendum will still continue. What we will get, as citizens, is a bigger opening of our freedom of expression. In any democratic environment, people must have the courage to speak their minds. It’s fundamental and at the heart of the democratic learning process.

If we can pass this process, under which people can speak their minds amid their differences without violence, I think we can still have a future, with democracy growing along with us. It’s a test for us people as well.

How do you see the future of politics here?

Actually, I don’t see that fights for people’s rights and liberty or fights for democracy are all about this Article 61’s clause 2. The fight on this article is just part of that, which would open the door to us for more freedom. In fact, we have a lot of things waiting for us to fight for and probably for a long period of time before we can see really true democracy.

The new charter matter is another thing to fight about. It’s a charter which is difficult to be amended. People actually want to see a much more democratic charter than it is. So, the fight will not end here easily because what we see now is an attempt to cling onto power for those in power. What is feared is that it [the power structure] will subtly transform into something else under this charter and after an election. For instance, there is a certain design to select a new prime minister, and this could pose a major obstacle to the progress of democracy in the country.

If things really go as planned, we would see a semi-democratic regime taking place, like what occurred during the 1980s, 30 years back to the past, despite the fact that we progressed almost 80 per cent to achieve a mature democracy, in my view. This would actually trigger a conflict because pressure will be built up as a result of the continued suppression. I don’t say this by just guessing it, but I am saying this because of what we see around us now.

My perspective about the politic’s future here is that it will be very hard for us indeed to get back to the point we were, which was almost a mature democracy. And it will take some time for us to fight together with fully democratic minds and in peace. But we should never forget, and bear in mind, that democracy will never be achieved via violence. With this ideology natured here somehow already, I am still hopeful.

Crazy, talented and Asian

ศาสตร์เกษตรดินปุ๋ย : ขอบคุณแหล่งข้อมูล : หนังสือพิมพ์ The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/life/Crazy-talented-and-Asian-30281367.html

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Singaporean-born novelist Kevin Kwan pens two best-selling novels – 'Crazy Rich Asians' and 'China Rich Girlfriend'. The Nation/Sukol Kerdnaimongkol

Singaporean-born novelist Kevin Kwan pens two best-selling novels – ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ and ‘China Rich Girlfriend’. The Nation/Sukol Kerdnaimongkol

Cover of 'Crazy Rich Asians' Photo courtesy of Asia Books

Cover of ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ Photo courtesy of Asia Books

Cover of 'China Rich Girlfriend' Photo courtesy of Asia Books

Cover of ‘China Rich Girlfriend’ Photo courtesy of Asia Books

Kevin Kwan is staying sane as he encounters fame and acclaim for his books “Crazy Rich Asians” and “China Rich Girlfriend”

With its huge publishing industry and a potential Asian-American readership well in excess of 10 million people, the US sounds like an ideal place for an Asian novelist to live off his laurels. But it’s also a path strewn with difficulties and even best-selling authors find it near impossible to enjoy financial freedom without a second career.

That said, the ride has so far been smooth for Singaporean-born novelist Kevin Kwan whose two novels – “Crazy Rich Asians” and “China Rich Girlfriend” – have become international best-sellers and are now slated for screen adaptations.

“I consider myself lucky as so many of my friends who are choreographers and content creators have a hard time. There’s so much content on the Internet these days that competition is fierce. Content creators are not being valued the way they used to be,” he says.

In Thailand recently to give a talk at the Bangkok Edge Festival, Kwan took time out to give interviews to the local press, conceding that international speaking engagements and chats with the press are just two of the ways his novels have changed his life.

//

Born and raised in Singapore, where he attended Anglo-Chinese School in the mornings and spent his afternoons chasing after neighbourhood dogs on his bike, Kwan was 11 when the family moved to the US.

“My father had always wanted to live in the West. He loved the lifestyle there, and he had no choice but to emigrate,” he says.

Dad was an engineer and mum a pianist. Neither were bookworms. “My dad didn’t read for pleasure. He read books for reference.”

Instead Kwan credits his aunt, a librarian in Singapore, for instilling a love of reading in him and giving him books to read from age seven. “I can recall the first book I read, cover to cover by myself. It was ‘The Wishing-Chair’ by Enid Blyton. It was like the early Harry Potter books, with a fantasy world, magic, fairies and special people. Looking back, I think my mother thought I was reading too much and would have preferred to see me outside playing football,” he says with a fond smile.

In the US, Kwan attended Clear Lake High School in Houston, Texas, home to Space Centre Houston, NASA Mission Control and International Space Station Mission Control. His school pals were the children of astronauts.

“I had this wonderful English teacher. She was the first to give me creative writing assignments. The first thing I wrote for her was an essay about Marilyn Monroe. She liked it so much that she tried to get it published. That’s when I realised I had a talent for writing.’

Kwan believes he benefitted from the US education which, unlike Singapore where the emphasis is on mathematics and science, encourages students to follow their interests.

“Life was interesting because for the first time, I was learning for the love of learning. The philosophy in the US is that education should be fun, which is very different from Singapore. In Singapore, teachers will say these are the things you have to learn, things to memorise, and these are the tests you have to pass. In the US, if you enjoy writing, you take writing classes,” he explains.

Kwan went to the University of Houston where he opted for a degree in creative writing. His confidence grew and he quickly became a regular contributor to the university’s paper.

“Personally I was much more interested in poetry. So I wrote a lot of experimental poetry. For me, poetry is like a jewel. You have to keep chipping away [at it] to find the perfection. My poetry teacher said a poem is never finished, only abandoned. And he was right.”

Kwan later moved to New York where he pursued a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree at Parsons School of Design. His early years in the city were spent working for Martha Stewart Living, Andy Warhol’s Interview magazine, and M&Co, the design firm founded by Tibor Kalman. In 2000, he set up his own creative studio, where he specialised in producing high profile visual projects for clients such as the New York Times, the Museum of Modern Art and Rockwell Group.

In his free time, he wrote poetry and attempted to complete the manuscript of his first novel, “a hobby,” he says of the tome.

“I wasn’t really doing it for money because I was making a good living as a consultant,” he says.

His debut novel, “Crazy Rich Asians”, published in 2013, tells the story of three super-rich, pedigreed Chinese families and scheming that occurs when Nick, the heir to one of the most massive fortunes in Asia, brings home his ABC (American-born Chinese) girlfriend, Rachel, to the dismay of the whole clan.

“I grew up in a privileged professional family. The characters in my book are the people with whom I came into contact. So I thought I would write about what I knew best. And people are fascinated by the very rich and powerful,” he says.

“But I don’t belong to that world. I’m just a visitor to that world occasionally. I was lucky in the sense that no one was writing about contemporary Asian wealth in fiction form,” Kwan says.

The book looks set to change the usual stereotypical image of Asians in the West, who are often seen as penny-pinching immigrants. The protagonist Nick is an Oxbridge-educated New York University history professor with a family home in Singapore that looks like a palace. Rachel, 29, is a professor of economics at NYU and was educated at two of the top U universities: Stanford and Northwestern. The other characters include cigar-puffing Asian tycoons who get around in private jets, male Hong Kong fashionistas, Chuppies (Chinese yuppies) and Henwees (high-net worth individuals).

“Of course there are Asian stereotypes in the US. There they tend to only see immigrants who came in poor but built business empires. They don’t see the world of old money and the sophistication that exists in Asia as depicted in the book.

“Asian wealth has had a profound effect on the luxury economy, so much so that the international high-end brands are now catering primarily to the Asian market.

While Kwan admits to being “comfortable”, he is quick to explain that he is nothing like the super-rich in his books. Writing is still a financially precarious career, he says, adding that he knows quite a few best-selling authors who need to supplement their incomes by holding down university teaching jobs.

“That’s the sad truth of creative life in the US. That’s the case in Asia too. They can’t make a living as a writer,” he said.

Being an Asian writer in the US is a struggle, too, in the sense that he has to contend with losing a big share of the market by writing a book about something that’s exotic. “It’s a struggle for any writers of

colour to get their work noticed, whether you are Asian, African-American or native American. You’re not going to sell as many books as Danielle Steel. If I wrote about crazy rich blondes, those privileged Park Avenue princesses, I think I would capture a larger audience,” he says.

But there are advantages to being a best-selling writer and Kwan admits that his books have changed his life profoundly. A film adaptation of “Crazy Rich Asians” is being made by Ivanhoe Pictures, and the author is executive producer.

“I also do a lot more travelling that I used to and am much more in the public eye. There’s a general perception that I must have made millions of dollars. That’s far from the truth given the economics of the publishing world,” he says with a grin.

On the shelf

“Crazy Rich Asians” has been translated into Thai by Sasi Pin under the title “Liam Botan” and is published by Gallery Publishing. It’s available at Asia Books, Hardcover, Candide, B2S, Kinokuniya, Nai-in and other leading bookshops and costs Bt495. The English versions of Kwan’s novels can be found at Asia Books and other leading bookstores.